{'item': '11Os67/75; 13Os115/75; 10Os2/77; 12Os196/77; 13Os58/80; 12Os129/81; 9Os40/85; 11Os75/85; 9Os154/85; 13Os157/85; 15Os79/88; 12Os105/88; 11Os2

RIS Dokument GerichtOGH RechtssatznummerRS0094279 Entscheidungsdatum18.02.2026 Geschäftszahl11Os67/75; 13Os115/75; 10Os2/77; 12Os196/77; 13Os58/80; 12Os129/81; 9Os40/85; 11Os75/85; 9Os154/85; 13Os157/85; 15Os79/88; 12Os105/88; 11Os22/89; 15Os72/89; 13Os71/89 (13Os72/89); 11Os115/89; 14Os181/89; 13Os11/90 (13Os12/90; 13Os13/90); 14Os46/90; 14Os9/91; 12Os66/91 (12Os67/91); 12Os109/91; 15Os99/91; 15Os52/91; 14Os103/91; 11Os132/91 (11Os133/91); 11Os44/92; 14Os72/92 (14Os73/92); 15Os56/92; 14Os116/92; 14Os131/92; 12Os60/93; 15Os102/93; 13Os27/94 (13Os28/94); 15Os20/94; 14Os88/94; 14Os106/94; 15Os48/95; 14Os189/95; 15Os146/96; 15Os111/96; 11Os28/98; 14Os69/00; 15Os59/03; 14Os88/03; 11Os62/03; 11Os140/04; 14Os63/06f; 14Os10/12w; 13Os6/13a; 12Os43/12k; 12Os94/15p; 12Os88/16g; 12Os116/16z; 12Os139/23t; 11Os114/25m; 12Os150/25p NormStGB §142 Abs2 G RechtssatzDie in § 142 Abs 2 StGB aufgezählten Voraussetzungen müssen kumulativ gegeben sein.Die in Paragraph 142, Absatz 2, StGB aufgezählten Voraussetzungen müssen kumulativ gegeben sein. EntscheidungstexteTE OGH 1975-09-04 11 Os 67/75 Veröff: EvBl 1976/98 S 186 TE OGH 1975-09-25 13 Os 115/75 Veröff: EvBl 1976/116 S 216 = ÖJZ-LSK 1975/188 TE OGH 1977-02-16 10 Os 2/77 TE OGH 1978-03-30 12 Os 196/77 Veröff: EvBl 1978/215 S 667 TE OGH 1980-06-12 13 Os 58/80 TE OGH 1981-09-17 12 Os 129/81 TE OGH 1985-04-17 9 Os 40/85 TE OGH 1985-06-04 11 Os 75/85 TE OGH 1985-11-06 9 Os 154/85 Veröff: JBl 1986,468 (dort irrig 9 Os 154/84) TE OGH 1985-11-28 13 Os 157/85 TE OGH 1988-08-02 15 Os 79/88 TE OGH 1988-09-29 12 Os 105/88 Veröff: SSt 59/70 TE OGH 1989-04-11 11 Os 22/89 TE OGH 1989-08-01 15 Os 72/89 Veröff: SSt 60/46 TE OGH 1989-09-14 13 Os 71/89 TE OGH 1989-11-14 11 Os 115/89 TE OGH 1990-03-06 14 Os 181/89 TE OGH 1990-04-19 13 Os 11/90 TE OGH 1990-06-12 14 Os 46/90 Veröff: JBl 1990,805 TE OGH 1991-03-12 14 Os 9/91 TE OGH 1991-07-04 12 Os 66/91 TE OGH 1991-10-03 12 Os 109/91 TE OGH 1991-09-26 15 Os 99/91 TE OGH 1991-08-29 15 Os 52/91 TE OGH 1991-11-05 14 Os 103/91 Vgl auch TE OGH 1991-12-17 11 Os 132/91 TE OGH 1992-06-02 11 Os 44/92 TE OGH 1992-06-30 14 Os 72/92 TE OGH 1992-08-20 15 Os 56/92 TE OGH 1992-10-20 14 Os 116/92 TE OGH 1992-11-24 14 Os 131/92 TE OGH 1993-06-24 12 Os 60/93 TE OGH 1993-08-26 15 Os 102/93 TE OGH 1994-04-20 13 Os 27/94 TE OGH 1994-04-07 15 Os 20/94 TE OGH 1994-07-26 14 Os 88/94 TE OGH 1994-08-18 14 Os 106/94 TE OGH 1995-06-01 15 Os 48/95 TE OGH 1996-01-30 14 Os 189/95 TE OGH 1996-10-24 15 Os 146/96 TE OGH 1996-09-05 15 Os 111/96 TE OGH 1998-06-23 11 Os 28/98 TE OGH 2000-06-27 14 Os 69/00 TE OGH 2003-06-12 15 Os 59/03 TE OGH 2003-08-05 14 Os 88/03 TE OGH 2003-08-05 11 Os 62/03 TE OGH 2005-04-12 11 Os 140/04 TE OGH 2006-07-11 14 Os 63/06f TE OGH 2012-04-03 14 Os 10/12w TE OGH 2013-02-14 13 Os 6/13a TE OGH 2013-06-20 12 Os 43/12k TE OGH 2015-08-27 12 Os 94/15p TE OGH 2016-08-18 12 Os 88/16g TE OGH 2016-12-15 12 Os 116/16z TE OGH 2024-01-11 12 Os 139/23t TE OGH 2025-10-07 11 Os 114/25m vgl TE OGH 2026-02-18 12 Os 150/25p vgl European Case Law IdentifierECLI:AT:OGH0002:1975:RS0094279