1965 Oct. 15 [VASSILIADES, TRIANTAFYLLIDES AND MUNIR, JJ.] COSTAS HJI COSTA, (No. 1), COSTAS Appellant, v. Respondent. {Criminal Appeal No. 2780) Criminal Procedure—Application to recall witness under section 25
(3)of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960 (Law 14 of 1960) must be properly made, in due time and be sufficiently supported. In the course of the hearing of the above appeal the appel lant applied to the Supreme Court for leave to have a prosecu tion witness recalled for further examination in the exercise of its powers under section 25
(3)of the Courts of Justice Law, I960 (Law 14 of I960). The Supreme Court dismissed the application on the ground that it was not properly made,in due course and sufficiently supported. The cases of: Kousoulides (No. I) v. The Republic 1962 C.L.R. 24, Pitsillos v. The Police (Criminal Appeal No. 2457, decided on the 30th March, 1962, unreported), and Kolias v. Police
(1963)1 C.L.R. 52, cited with approval. Application to recall witness under section 25
(3)oj the Courts of Justice Law, 1960, refused. Case adjourned to the 1 8//Ϊ November, 1965. for judgment. Cases referred to : Kousoulides (No. I) v. Republic 1962 C.L.R. 24 ; Pitsillos v. Police (Criminal Appeal No. 2457, decided on the 30th March, 1962, unreported) : Kolias v. Police
(1963)I C.L.R. 52. Ruling. Ruling on an application to recall a witness. for the appellant. S. Georghiades, counsel of respondent. 93 (No. 1) v. THE RKI*UBLIC THE REPUBLIC, G. Tornaritis, Hji COSTA the Republic, for the 1965 Oct. 15 COSTAL HJI COMA (N... i) v HK RptTHMc T h e following ruling was delivered by : VASSILIADES, J.: Dealing first with M r . Tornaritis' application to have witness 3 recalled for further examination, under the provisions of section 25
(3)of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960, we have to repeat what has already k e e n p 0 { n t e d o u t m o r e than once before ; that such an application will only be entertained if properly made, in due course, and if sufficientlv supported, as directed in Kousoulides (No. 1) v. The Republic 1962 C.L.R. 2 4 ; in Pitsillos v. The Police (Criminal Appeal No. 2457, decided on the 30th March, 1962 unreported) ; Pericles loannou Kolias v. The Police
(1963)1 C.L.R. 52 and in several other cases decided thereafter, to which we need not now refer. T h e application to recall witness Ritsa Georghiou (P.W. 3) is therefore, refused. As regards the merits of the appeal, we are inclined to agree with counsel for the appellant that this is a most serious case for his client, and we would like to have more time to consider our judgment. We wish to avoid reserving judgment sine die in a criminal appeal ; unfortunately, we have no dav available before the 18th November. T h e case will be adjourned to the 18th November, for judgment. T h e appellant is under his sentence-warrant. Application to recall witness under section 25
(3)of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960, refused. Case adjourned to the Wh November, 1965, for judgment. 94