(1980)1980 March 8 [TRIANTAFYLUDES, P.] IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST "DOREA NICOU AND DESPINAS PATTICHI IS TIN POLIN LEMESOU" and IN THE MATTER OF THE CHARITIES LAW, CAP. 41 BETWEEN: THE TRUSTEES OF "DOREA NICOU AND DESPINAS PATTICHI IS TIN POLIN LEMESOU ", Plaintiffs, and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Defendant. (Charity Application No. 1/79). r Charitable trusts—Objects of the Charity—Amendment—Sanction of the Court—Section 13(
- b)of the Charities Law, Cap. 41—No longer possible to apply property left by the donorsfor specified charitable objects due to changed circumstances—Court satisfied that it is necessary and expedient for the administration of the 5 Charity to sanction amendments appliedfor, subject to condition that sanction of the Court will have to be obtained in case of sale or other disposition of property—Cy-pres doctrine. The plaintiffs, who are the trustees of a charitable trust known as "Donation of Nicos and Despina Pattichi for the town of 10 Limassol" ("the Charity"), sought the sanction of the Court to alter the name of the Charity into "Charitable Institution of Nicos and Despina Pattichi for the town of Limassol" and to amend the trust deed by adding to the initial objects of the Charity, namely the grant of scholarships for university or 15 other of equivalent nature studies and the creation of a Municipal 220 \ I C.L.R. 5 10 15 20 25 30 \ Pattichi v.Attoraey-Geotral Nursery in Limassol, the further object of using the funds of theCharity for public utility projects in the town of Limassol or by the Limassol Municipality, as the plaintiffs, as trustees, may deem proper. The main reason for the decision to extend the ambit of the objects of theCharity was that,due to changed circumstances,therewasnot somuch scope,asbefore, for grants of scholarships for university studies and the funds of the Charity had, therefore, to be diverted elsewhere. The creators of theCharity were both alive andtheyagreed to the amendment of the objects as above. Therefore, this casewas not a usual instance necessitating the application of the cy-pres doctrine, which is normally resorted to when the creator of a charityisnolongeralive. Also,thedefendant Attorney-General has signified his consent. - - Held, that thisCourtis,byvirtueofsection 13(b)oftheCharitiesLaw,Cap.41,empoweredto sanction theapplied foFamendment; that,on the basis of the material before it,it is satisfied that it is necessary and expedient for the administration of the Charity in question to sanction all the amendments applied for by the plaintiffs, subject to the condition that in case of sale or other disposition of property of the charity the sanction of the Court will have to be obtained under section 13(
- c)of Cap. 41; and that, accordingly, the amendments applied for should be effected subject to the aforementioned condition. Application granted. Cases referred to: "The Orphanage and Training School,DemetrakisG. Dianellos of Larnaca" v. TheAttorney-General of theRepublic
(1977)1 C.L.R. 302; TheTrustees oftheCyprus OverseasReliefFundv. TheAttorneyGeneral of the Republic
(1978)1 C.L.R. 430; InreCampden Charities[1881] 18Ch. D. 310at p.323. Charity Application. Application by the Trustees of the Charity known as the 35 "Dorea Nicou and Despinas Pattichi is tin polin Lemesou" under section 13(b) of the Charities Law, Cap. 41,for an order sanctioning the alteration of the name of the Charity into "Philanthropikon Idrima Nicou and Despinas Pattichi is tin 221 Pattichi τ. Attorney-General
(1980)Polin Lemesou" and for an order amending the trust deed and the relevant Regulations. J. Potamitis, for the plaintiffs. Gl. HadjiPetrou, for the defendant. Cur. adv. vult. TRIANTAFYLLIDES P. read the following judgment. The plaintiffs are the trustees of a charitable trust known as "Dorea Nicou and Despinas Pattichi is tin polin Lemesou" ("Donation of Nicos and Despina Pattichi for the town of Limassol" ). This charitable trust (to be referred to hereinafter as the "Charity") was created by a trust deed dated June 6, 1974, which has been enrolled in the Supreme Court on August 5, 1974, under section 12 of the Charities Law, Cap.
- 10 Nicos Pattichis and his wife Despina Pattichi who,as donors, are the creators of the Charity, are alive, and Nicos Pattichis 15 is one of the plaintiffs—trustees in this case. In addition to the aforesaid trust deed there were, also, executed, on the same date as the deed, that is on June 6, 1974, the Regulations of the Charity. By means of the present application the sanction of this 20 Court is sought for altering the name of the Charity into "Philanthropikon Idrima Nicou and Despinas Pattichi is tin polin Lemesou" ( "Charitable Institution of Nicos and Despina Pattichi for the town of Limassol"), and, also, for amending the trust deed in so far as the second paragraph of the preamble 25 to such deed and clauses 4, 5, 6 and 7 thereof are concerned, as well as for amending paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the aforesaid Regulations. The plaintiffs adopted this course as a result of relevant deci sions reached at a meeting on April 26, 1979; and as it appears 30 from the minutes of such meeting themain purpose of the afore mentioned amendments is to add to the initial objects of the Charity, namely the grant of scholarships for university or other of equivalent nature studies and the creation of a Municipal Nursery in Limassol, the further object of using the funds of the 35 Charity for public utility projects in the town of Limassol or by the Limassol Municipality, as the plaintiffs, as trustees, may deem proper. 222 5 1 C.L.R. Pattichi v. Attorney-General Triantafyllldes P. It isexpressly stated in the said minutes that the amendments inquestion are beingmadeinaccordance with theexpress desire, in this lespect, of the creators of the Charity. This Court is asked to sanction the said amendments in the 5 exercise of its powers under section 13(b) of Cap. 41, which reads as follows:"
- The Supreme Court shall have power and jurisdiction(a) 10 (b) to give all such directions and make all such orders as may appear to it necessary or expedient for the administration of any trust created for a charitable purpose; (c) " In "The Orphanage and Training School, Demetrakis G. 15 Dianellosof Larnaca" v. The Attorney-General of the Republic,
(1977)1C.L.R. 302,and in The Trusteesof the CyprusOverseas Relief Fund v. The Attorney-General of the Republic,
(1978)I C.L.R. 430, I have dealt with the extent of the powers of this Court under section 13(b), above, of Cap. 41; and I think that 20 I am empowered to sanction the applied for amendments. As it is to be derived from the minutes of the meeting of the plaintiffs on April 26, 1979, the main reason for the decision to extend the ambit of the objects of the Charity is that, due to changed circumstances, there is not so much scope, as before, 25 for grants of scholarships for university studies and the funds of the Charity have, therefore, to be diverted elsewhere (see, in this respect, interalia, Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd ed., vol. 4, p. 418, para. 870). In the case of In re Campden Charities,[1881] 18 Ch. D. 310, 30 Jessel M.R. stated (at p. 323):- 35 "In the first place, the scheme ismade in pursuance of what is commonly known as the cy-pres doctrine, and, in cases like this, it is applied where, from lapse of time and change of circumstances, it is no longer possible beneficially to apply the property left by the founder or donor in the exact way in which he has directed it to be applied, but it can only be applied beneficially to similar purposes by different means." 223 TWantafyllides p. Pattichi τ. Attorney-Genetal
(1980)It has to be pointed out that the present case is not a usual instance necessitating the application of the cy-pros doctrine, which is normally resorted towhen thecreator of a charity isno longer alive; because thecreators of the Charity with which we are concerned in this case are both alive and they have, as 5 already stated earlier on in thisjudgment, agreed to the amend mentof theobjects oftheCharityinrespectofwhichthesanction of this Court is being sought. Also, the defendant AttorneyGeneral has signified his consent. Inthelight ofalltheforegoing, andonthebasisofthematerial 10 before me, I am satisfied that it is necessary and expedient for the administration of the Charityin question to sanctionall the amendments applied for by the plaintiffs, subject, however, to the conditionthatincase of saleor otherdisposition ofproperty of the CharitythesanctionoftheCourtwillhave tobe obtained 15 under section 13(c) of Cap.41. In theresult, it is hereby orderedthattheamendments applied for by the plaintiffs should be effected subject to the afore mentionedcondition. Ϊ am makingnoorderas tothecosts of theseproceedings,but 20 it is expected that the Limassol Municipality, which will benefit to a very large extentfrom thesaid amendments, will indemnify the plaintiffs in respect of thecosts which they incurred in this case. Application granted. 25 224