clr/1986/1986_3_2213.pdf

(1)The submission of counsel for the respondents cannot be upheld Such an approach, if upheld, will be calamitous for all those, who because of scarcity of jobs the\ .ire praiseworthily prepared to be employed even at posts below the level of their qualifications. 2213 Mavronichis v. Industrial Training Authority

(2)Applicant's higher qualifications, envisaged as an advantage in the scheme of service, rendered him strikingly superior to the interested party. It follows that the sub judice decision was not reasonably open to the respondent. 5 Sub judice decision annulled. No order as to costs. Recourse. Recourse against the decision of the respondent to ap­ point the interested party to the post of Head of Accounts Section. 10 E. Efstathiou with C. Anastassiades and N. Stylianidou (Miss), for the, applicant. M. Spanos, for the respondent. Cur adv. vult. TRIANTAFYLLIDES P. read the following judgment. By means of the present recourse the applicant is challenging the decision of the respondent, on the 2nd November 1981, to appoint Cleanthis Ioannou (to be referred to here­ inafter as the "interested party") to the post of "Head of Accounts Section." 15 20 After the filing of the present recourse the interested party, due to personal reasons, submitted his resignation from the post in question, which the respondent accepted on the 26th October

1. Then the said post which had, thus, become vacant 25 was abolished by a decision of the Council of Ministers, dated the 3rd November 1983, and a new post was created in its place, namely that of "Head of Financial Manage­ ment". "> Γ Counsel for the respondent submitted that as a result uf these developments the applicant was deprived of a legitimate interest entitling him to proceed further with his present recourse, but, by a decision which I gave on the 6th June 1984,* and the contents of which should be treated as being incorporated in the present judgment, this sub* See 11986) 3 CL.R.
2. 2214 30 35 3 C.L.R. Mavronichis v. Industrial Training Authority Triantafyllides P. mission was not sustained and, thus, this case was heard, and will now be determined, on its merits. In this respect counsel for the applicant had drawn my attention to paragraph (e) of the relevant scheme of service, 5 which, in relation to the required qualifications for the post concerned, provides that "A University diploma or degree or equivalent qualification in an appropriate subject, i.e. Economics, Commercial Subjects, Bus:ness Administration etc. or membership of a recognized body of professional 10 Accountants will be treated as an advantage"; and counsel for the applicant went on to submit that in view of the much higher, in comparison to those of the interested par­ ty, qualifications of the applicant, the appo:ntment of the interested party, instead of the applicant, was not reason15 ably open to the respondent. 20 25 30 35 As it appears from a comparative table showing the qualifications of the applicant and of the interested party, which was produced by counsel for the respondent, the applicant is an Assoc!ate Member of the Association of International Accountants, an Associate Member of the Institute of Administrative Accountants, an Associate Mem­ ber of the Association of Cost and Executive Accountants (A.C.E.A.), a Member of the Association of Accounting Technicians (Μ.Α,ΑΤ.). a Member of the Institute of Commerc;al Management (M. INST.C.M.) and a Member of the Institute of Accounting Staff (M.I.A.S.). whereas the interested party possesses the Cyprus Certificate for the English Language and had passed the examinations in Bcok-Keeping (Stage ID of the Royal Society of Arts. Counsel for the respondent had agreed that the appli­ cant possessed higher qualifications than the interested party, but he argued that the interested party was rghtly preferred for appointment because the duties of the post were below the 'ovel of the applicant's qualifications and. as he was ambitious, his appointment to the post in question would not offer him satisfaction at all and this would have adverse repercussions on the performance of h ; s duties, whereas the interested party, even with his lower qualifications, was more suitable, especially as he 2215 rriantafyllides P. Mavronichis v. Industrial Training Authority vould perform his duties with greater nan the applicant.

(1986)"job satisfaction" I cannot accept as correct the view that a highly qualified ;andidate can be bypassed in favour of a less qualified ;andidate because the qualifications of the highly qualified 5 :andidate are too many for the duties of the particular post and he may not get as much job satisfaction per­ forming them as would get the less qualified candidate. [f such an approach is upheld and prevails it will be ca­ lamitous for all those who -because of scarcity of jobs 10 they are praiseworthily prepared to be employed even at posts below the level of their qualifications. In my opinion the disregard, without any real justificaion, by the respondents of the by far higher qualificaions of the applicant, which by virtue of the scheme of 15 »ervice had to be treated as an advantage in his favour, ind which in any event rendered him strikingly superior ο the interested party, has to lead to the conclusion that .he decision to appoint the interested party, instead of ihe applicant, was not reasonably open to the respondent. 20 In the light of all the foregoing the sub judice decision is annulled; but I shall not make any order as to its costs. Sub judice decision annulled. No order as to costs. 2216 25