Decision 630/2016 × Who we are The CommissionIrene Sharpe Hara Nikolopoulou Panagiotis Fotis Ioannis Stefatos Charikleia Vlachou Pantelis Borovas Anna Gatziou Michael Polemis Milliou Chrysovalantou-Vasiliki Angeliki Kanellopoulou Strategic Plan Mission & Responsibilities Organizational Chart Directorate-General for Competition International Relations and Communication Information Press Releases For Citizens & BusinessLearn About Us Competition & SMEs Conferences & Seminars News & Announcements Whistleblowing System for Citizens & Business Whistleblowing System for Contracting Authorities Sector InquiriesCoastal Shipping Bank Deposits Waste Management and Recycling Health Services Fintech E-commerce Basic consumer goods Regulatory InterventionsPetroleum Industry Press Distribution Sector Construction Sector Market MappingsMapping of the Feta cheese market Mapping of the Animal feed market Mapping of the Verinary Medicinal Products market Mapping of the Plain Yoghurt market Mapping of the Fresh Cow’s Milk market PublicationsNewsletters Annual Reports Guides OECD Annual Reports Research Publications Other Publications Media All publications SustainabilitySustainability Sandbox Competition Law & Sustainability Legislation Protection of Free Competition Rules on Operational Procedures and Management Treatment of confidential information General Data Protection Regulation Code of Ethics and Cybersecurity Complaints Commitments Leniency Programme Settlement Procedure Manual of Operational Procedures Calculation of fines No-action letter Implementation of Article 1A Accessibility Statement Decisions Contact EL EN Who we are About the HCC Strategic Plan Mission & Responsibilities Organizational Chart Directorate-General for Competition International Relations and Communication The Commission Irene Sharpe Hara Nikolopoulou Panagiotis Fotis Ioannis Stefatos Charikleia Vlachou Pantelis Borovas Anna Gatziou Michael Polemis Milliou Chrysovalantou-Vasiliki Angeliki Kanellopoulou Information Press Releases For Citizens & BusinessLearn About Us Competition & SMEs Conferences & Seminars News & Announcements Whistleblowing System for Citizens & Business Whistleblowing System for Contracting Authorities Sector InquiriesCoastal Shipping Bank Deposits Waste Management and Recycling Health Services Fintech E-commerce Basic consumer goods Regulatory InterventionsPetroleum Industry Press Distribution Sector Construction Sector Market MappingsMapping of the Feta cheese market Mapping of the Animal feed market Mapping of the Verinary Medicinal Products market Mapping of the Plain Yoghurt market Mapping of the Fresh Cow’s Milk market PublicationsNewsletters Annual Reports Guides OECD Annual Reports Research Publications Other Publications Media All publications SustainabilitySustainability Sandbox Competition Law & Sustainability Legislation Legislation Protection of Free Competition Rules on Operational Procedures and Management Treatment of confidential information General Data Protection Regulation Code of Ethics and Cybersecurity Complaints Commitments Leniency Programme Settlement Procedure Manual of Operational Procedures Calculation of fines No-action letter Implementation of Article 1A Accessibility Statement Decisions Contact You are here: Decisions 2016 Decision 630/2016 Search: Thursday, 22 September 2016 11:30 Decision 630/2016 font size decrease font size increase font size Print Decision on the ex-officio investigation of the General Directorate for Competition concerning the complaint of the Consumer Protection Center (KEPKA) for violation of the provisions of article 2 of the Greek law 703/1977, as in force, regarding the operation of the parking lots of Thessaloniki Airport "Macedonia" (SKG). Decision 630/2016 File (PDF) Decision 630/2016 Date of Publication of Decision September 22nd, 2016 Issue Number of Government Bulletin Relevant Market Vehicle Parking Services at Airports Proceedings Abuse of a Dominant Position Legal Framework Article 2 of the Greek Competition Act 3959/2011 Decision Not finding an infringement Complainant CONSUMER PROTECTION CENTER Respondent 1. "BORIS MOUZENIDIS single-person limited liability company" 2. Hellenic Air Force Summary of Decision The Competition Commission, with its unanimous decision, rejected the complaint of the Consumer Protection Center (KEPKA) concerning the operation of car parks at Thessaloniki Airport "Macedonia" (SKG) by the company under the name "BORIPOS MOE ", with registered name "Cargo Service & Representations ", to which the operation of these parking lots was awarded by contract. In particular, the Commission did not find any imposition by the leasing company "Cargo Service & Representations", of unreasonable charges for parking vehicles in the three parking spaces of SKG in violation of the provisions of article 2 of law 703/1977. Nor did it find any breach of these provisions by the Hellenic Air Force (the lessor) regarding any anti-competitive consequences of the contract in question, and did not consider that there was any need for further investigation by the Competition Commission. Taking into account the factual analysis and, in particular, the comparison of the company’s revenue and expenditure from the operation of the parking spaces, there was no evidence of the imposition of unreasonable charges by the Cargo Service & Representations and therefore no abuse of its dominant position took place. Also, no behavioral measures were proposed to the Hellenic Air Force, which is not considered to constitute an undertaking in this case, while it was taken into account that the determination of the lease does not fall within the scope of voluntary action of the Hellenic Air Force. The examination of the individual provisions of the contracts for the lease of parking spaces of SKG did not reveal the existence of anti-competitive conditions. Judicial Means Final. Decision has not been appealed. Decisions by the Court of Appeal of Athens(Administrative Division) - Share it 0Shares LinkedIn X Bluesky Viber Whatsapp Tagged under KEPKA THESSALONIKI AIRPORT back to top Year published 2026
Επεξήγηση AI βάσει του επίσημου κειμένου του νόμου. Ενδεικτική, δεν υποκαθιστά νομική συμβουλή.