Published on 12 June 2023 Email this Share this on LinkedIn Share this on Facebook Communiqué CSSF/CAA joint conference on EMIR Reporting The joint CSSF-CAA conference on EMIR Reporting was held on 5, 6 and 7 June. Initially scheduled for 5 June only, due to high demand, the conference immediately had to be extended to 3 days with limited access to allow a larger number of entities to participate. In total, 160 institutions – including UCIs, banks, investment firms, corporate, insurance, association and law firms – were able to hear the considerations expressed by the CSSF and the CAA. On 5 June, a particular attention was paid to the insurance sector, given the participation of Mr Thierry Flamand, President of Executive Committee of the CAA. The conference covered three topics: Derivative market in Luxembourg What is next? EMIR Refit What is coming? New Data Quality supervision The structure of the Luxembourg derivative market was illustrated, sharing a few key considerations based on the CSSF’s supervisory experience. Key elements of EMIR Refit Reporting, which will enter into force on 29 April 2024 with a ‘big bang’, were presented clearly drawing the attention of the audience to what the entities should do before 29 April
- The new approach for data quality supervision developed by ESMA and embraced by CSSF and CAA was explained, including a detailed description of the 19 data quality indicators developed by ESMA and implemented also by the CSSF. On EMIR Refit Reporting, the key messages delivered were: Ensure continuity across 29 April
- Start preparing for these changes as soon as possible. Any failure to report accurately as from 29 April 2024 will be considered as a non-compliance with Article 9 of EMIR. On EMIR Data Quality, the key messages delivered were: EMIR data quality is a key priority for ESMA for the CSSF as well as for the CAA. Leverage on existing EMIR obligations to reduce the compliance effort for data quality: use or upgrade confirmation process use or improve reconciliation process Both counterparties shall agree on details to be reported, involving all stakeholders in the reporting value chain. Bad data quality is a signal of other issues within the organisation. Outsourcing EMIR reporting does not relieve an entity from its duties. The entity must have access to its data and understand it. The CAA asks its entities to make sure that their TR reporting is consistent with its Solvency 2 reporting and the rapport distinct of its auditors. The CSSF asks its entities to make sure that their TR reporting is consistent with the information shared in other regulatory reporting. 12 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the next challenges CSSF & CAA joint conference on EMIR Refit Reporting and EMIR Data Quality Supervision 5 June 2023 Studies and reports PDF (1.42Mb) Main topic: European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges CSSF & CAA joint conference on EMIR Refit Reporting and EMIR Data Quality Supervision 5 June 2023 Agenda Derivative market in Luxembourg What is next? EMIR Refit What is coming? New Data Quality supervision 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 2 1 Derivative market in Luxembourg Key concepts around EMIR 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 3 EMIR Reporting: EMIR and ESMA EMIR is an EU Regulation, and together with its technical standards, is directly applicable in the EU. ESMA is the leading ESA on EMIR topics and plays a key role on EMIR Reporting, notably by : - Drafting the Regulatory/Implementing Technical Standards, considering also CPMI and ROC (for UTI and UPI) technical guidance. - Drafting specific report for the European Commission leveraging on EMIR data. - Ensuring supervisory convergence amongst NCAs. - Collaborating with non-EU jurisdictions. - Supervising trade repositories. CPMI: Committee Payments and Market Infrastructures ROC: Regulatory Oversight Committee, established in 2012 to coordinate and oversee a worldwide framework of legal entity identification (GLEIS). 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 4 EMIR Reporting: NCAs involved In Luxembourg, CSSF and CAA are the NCAs in charge of supervising the compliance with EMIR: - CAA for counterparties under its supervision. - CSSF for all other counterparties established in Luxembourg. CSSF is member of ESMA and in the EMIR related Standing Committees, because of that, it has a leading role in EMIR topics. Many other authorities and institutions (e.g. ESRB, SRB) as well as NCAs in other EU Member States receive Luxembourg EMIR data, depending e.g. on where the other counterparties are established, on the type of underlying or the currency of the derivative contract. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 5 EMIR Reporting Number of Cpts Number of trades Notional in Bln EUR LU NCA 639’011 5’456 CSSF 1’848 97’603 1’022 CSSF Bank 62 170’800 828 CSSF FC Insurance 29 7’939 14 CAA NFC PSF / PI / EMI 4 1’775 1 CSSF FC Inv. Firms 4 18’884 0,4 CSSF Nature Type FC UCI 9’495 NFC NPS FC Source: EMIR reporting as of 30/12/2022 and CSSF data Undertakings Collective Investments Not Prudentially Supervised (e.g. Corporates) Bank Insurance Investment Firms Professionals Financial Sector / Payment Institutions / Electronic Money Institutions 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 6 Considerations related to the derivative market Data is king, but data models are poor Excessive regulation? No, reasonable reaction of legislators DQ issues affects how firms are viewed by authorities Derivative market structure in Luxembourg 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 7 Derivatives Transactions: Different views Several stakeholders intervene in the derivative value chain. Each of them sees its portion of what is true. It’s up to the counterparty to the derivative to ensure that the reported picture reflect the truth. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 8 Data quality is only the visible part of larger issues Data Quality DQ is a key indicator of soundness of: IT systems, controls and processes; data models; and IT systems Data models overall governance. Controls and processes Governance 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 9 Data model: the key to extract value from data EMIR Data are still not organised. Processes not fully under control. EMIR obligations still managed in a siloapproach. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 10 Excessive regulation? No, reasonable reaction of legislators no. of mandatory fields for TR reconciliation 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 TR reconciliation is currently based on few fields agreed between TRs. Reconciliation rate is still very poor despite 9 years of EMIR Reporting. EU legislator has decided to take action. currently as from 04.2024 as from 04.2026 (since 02.2014) 5 June 2023 total fields EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges With EMIR Refit Technical Standards TR reconciliation is set in law. 11 Data Quality: how firms are viewed by authorities More than 50 authorities and EU institutions look and use EMIR data. Each authority looks with its own perspective, therefore all fields are relevant. How firms look with Data Quality How firms look without Data Quality Source: https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/99497/what-was-the-inspiration-for-the-design-of-r2-d2 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 12 Luxembourg: Fragmented Derivative Market 12 000 LU counterparties 100% 90% 80% 70% 1 Mln outstanding derivative contracts 60% 50% 40% 10 000 Bln EUR notional outstanding 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 10 100 % of total outstanding 1000 10000 % of total notional The market is highly fragmented 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 13 Publications based on EMIR data Increasing number of publications and work based on EMIR data such, as: 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Level 14 2 What next? EMIR Refit Reporting ‘Big bang’ on 29 April 2024 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 15 Focus on EMIR Refit Reporting EMIR Refit Reporting is based on 4 pillars as from 29 April
- 5 June 2023 • End-to-end XML reporting (ISO20022) • Validation rules • Framework for mandatory delegation • Information to NCAs for significant reporting issues • New controls and feedback reports by Trade Repositories EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 16 EMIR Refit Reporting messages End-to-end xml based reporting (no proprietary formats allowed) : All stakeholders access the same level of information, i.e. less transformations Structured data increases data quality 3 reporting tables: (i) Parties to the contract; (ii) contract details and (iii) collateral details Event based reporting (e.g. clearing / allocation) in addition to updated action types (e.g. revive). Transition period of 180 calendar days only for contracts that do not require any update or that mature during the period. New details or modified values to be reported (subsequent/prior UTI, collateralisation, counterparty data) – refer to guidelines UTI: Unique Trade Identifier 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 17 EMIR Refit Reporting messages: some changes Field no. Field name Change 2.3 / 2.4 2.8 2.152 / 2.153 Prior / Subsequent position UTI UPI Event type / Event Date New Fields 2.1 / 3.10* 2.27 / 3.9 UTI (incl. new waterfall logic) Collateral portfolio code Special characters (i.e. :.-_) forbidden * Uncapitalised letters forbidden too 1.2 1.7 / 1.13* 2.2** 2.26 2.34 Report submitting entity ID Clearing threshold counterparty 1 & 2 Report tracking number Collateral portfolio indicator Master Agreement type Mandatory * Applies also to FC now ** If MIC in 2.41 Venue of execution belongs to a TV 1.3 Entity responsible for reporting For OTC trades: IFM for funds --- FC for NFC- as per 9
(1a), 9
(1b), 9
(1c), 9
(1d)>2.50 Repeatable fields “The population of fields that are specified as optional in the validation rules is not left at the discretion of the reporting counterparties. Optional fields should be always populated in all cases where the field is relevant in the given scenario or for the given derivative.” ESMA - Final report on the Guidelines for reporting under EMIR (ESMA74-362-2281) 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 18 EMIR Refit Information to NCAs ITS Art. 9 introduces requirement to notify NCAs of both ERR and Counterparty for: Flaws in the system affecting significant number of reports Obstacle preventing to report Significant reporting errors that do not cause a rejection Definition of “significant” is included in guidelines Section 4.29 Common template for all adhering NCAs available on ESMA website including examples (as part of the validation rules Excel workbook) 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 19 EMIR Refit Mandatory delegation Mandatory delegation i.e. an entity is responsible and legally liable to report on behalf of other counterparties has been introduced by EMIR-Refit in 2019: FCs when counterparty to NFC-. Investment Fund Manager (IFM) for funds. ITS introduces requirement to have an agreement between FC and NFC-. NFC- remain responsible of EMIR duties (other than reporting) and are thus encouraged to have access to data. The ESMA EMIR Refit Guidelines encourage FCs to provide such data on a regular basis to NFC-. NFC- are entitled to receive information from TRs. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 20 EMIR Refit New TRs Controls and Reports TRs are required to control derivatives received (e.g. xml compliance, validation rules) as well as to reconcile outstanding reports and to provide feedback reports – in xml. Immediate feedback (within 60 minutes) reports to Report Submitting Entities Daily reconciliation report to Report Submitting Entities End-of-day reports to: Reporting counterparties, Report submitting entities, Entities responsible for reporting, Third party where access has been granted, Authorities. TAR TSR Rejections Reconciliation status No Valuation update No margin update Abnormal notional 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 21 What entities shall do before 29 April 2024 Ensure current transaction reports meet latest reporting standards. Terminate no longer outstanding transactions. Improve internal data to meet REFIT reporting requirements: Update format and content to meet new requirements on existing data; Collect data that is not yet available (counterparty information, UPI). Prepare the infrastructure for: New reporting logics (UTI, lifecycle events); xml reporting IN and OUT. Ensure upgrading capabilities in due time to accurately report outstanding derivatives throughout the big bang day (29 April 2024). Define processes to use TR feedback reports (e.g. internal KPIs, reconciliation with other reporting regimes / internal books, use of data to ensure compliance with other EMIR obligations). 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 22 CSSF and CAA communication CSSF Press release 22/33 on EMIR Refit reporting. “The CSSF considers that there is sufficient time for stakeholders to implement the changes until 29 April 2024 and that any failure to report accurately as from 29 April 2024 will be considered as a noncompliance with Article 9 of EMIR.” The CAA intends to publish a similar message 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 23 EMIR Refit: CSSF & CAA key messages Ensure continuity across 29 April 2024. Start preparing for these changes as soon as possible. Any failure to report accurately as from 29 April 2024 will be considered as a non-compliance with Article 9 of EMIR. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 24 3 What is coming? New DQ supervision New EMIR DQ assertive supervision 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 25 A new approach for Data Quality Supervision CSSF and CAA, following ESMA's lead, are becoming stricter with entities regarding their data quality supervision. from ESMA DQR… • 1 exercise/year (Sept.-Nov.) EMIR to ESMA DQEF • • Targeted DQ Activity (no limitation of # exercises / year) DQ Dashboard (19 indicators) calculated on a monthly basis Approach • Effort based • Result based Outcome • ESMA yearly report based on participation to DQR • ESMA yearly report based on DQ improvements observed over time EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges ESMA Data Quality currently based on 18 indicators. → Goal is to improve DQ for all of them. Indicators will evolve in the future based on e.g. new issues to be monitored, EMIR Refit reporting. 26 New DQIs Misreporting by reporting entity Misreporting by either one of the entities: DQI 6 Rejections DQI 1 Difference in Outstanding trades DQI 7 Late reports DQI 8 Outdated valuation DQI 9 Blank/abnormal maturity date DQI 10 Missing Valuation DQI 11 Missing Collateralisation DQI 2 Difference in Outstanding positions Potential misreporting DQI 12 Missing VM DQI 3 Difference of reports with AT=N DQI 4 Difference of reports with AT=P DQI 14 Anomalies DQI 5 Unpaired reports DQI 16 Duplicate reports DQI 17 Counterparty nature DQI 18 Corporate Sector DQI 13 Matching DQI 15 Lack of LEI DQI 19 Difference in Margins DQ1-DQ4 and DQ19 are evaluated between counterparty pairs AT=N means Action Type is ‘New’ while AT=P is ‘ 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 27 New DQ Data driven supervision CSSF has developed 18 DQIs based on ESMA approach. The goal is to reduce DQ issues with a new assertive supervision. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 28 Underreporting (DQI 6 8 10 11 12) FC and NFC+ only FC and NFC+ only Rejection Valuation Reporting Collateral Reporting A rejected report is considered as not having been submitted. The valuation of a contract has to be reported daily for FCs and NFC+ Unless no variation margin is exchanged variation margin is to be reported daily Rejections shall be monitored and re-submission ensured by counterparties DQI 6: Rejections 5 June 2023 DQI 8: Outdated Valuation DQI 11: Missing collateralisation (Field 1.21 to be populated as per agreement) DQI 10: Missing Valuation DQI 12: Missing VM (incl. Valuation at 0) (incl. VM at 0) EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 29 Double-sided (DQI 1 2 3 4 5 13 19) Differences Differences reported by Cpt A with Cpt B compared to Cpt B with Cpt A Reporting Cpt Other Cpt Number Margins (VM & IM) Cpt A Cpt B 500 EUR 2 Mln (received – paid) Cpt B Cpt A 800 EUR 5 Mln (paid – received) Difference 300 EUR 3 Mln DQI 1: Nr of outstanding trades DQI 3: Nr of reports with AT=N DQI 2: Nr of outstanding positions DQI 4: Nr of reports with AT=P TR reconciliation DQI 5: Unpaired reports DQI 13: Matching DQI 19: Consistent Margins (Portfolio codes) 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 30 Incorrect reporting (DQI 7 9 14 15 16 17 18) DQI 7: Late reports DQI 9: Blank / abnormal maturity date DQI 14: Anomalies* DQI 15: Lack of LEI (for large contracts) DQI 16: Duplicate reports DQI 17: Counterparty nature * Abnormal values based on statistical methods on quantitative data : - Notional Value of the contract Initial margin posted Initial margin collected Variation margin posted Variation margin collected Excess collateral posted Excess collateral collected Price/rate Fixed rate 1 Fixed rate 2 Quantity DQI 18: Corporate Sector 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 31 EMIR Data Quality: CSSF & CAA key messages EMIR data quality is a key priority for ESMA as well as for CSSF and CAA. Leverage on existing EMIR obligations to reduce the compliance effort for data quality: use or upgrade confirmation process RTS 149/2013 use or improve reconciliation process Both counterparties shall agree on details to be reported, involving all stakeholders in the reporting value chain. Bad data quality is a signal of other issues within the organisation. Outsourcing EMIR reporting does not relieve an entity from its duties. The entity must have access to its data and understand it. The CAA asks its entities to make sure that their TR reporting is consistent with its Solvency 2 reporting and the rapport distinct of its auditors. The CSSF asks its entities to make sure that their TR reporting is consistent with the information shared in other regulatory reporting. 5 June 2023 EMIR Reporting: Prepare for the Next Challenges 32 Useful links: - CSSF press release 22/33 https://www.cssf.lu/wpcontent/uploads/PR22_33_EMIR_Refit_reporting_standards_211222.pdf - ESMA EMIR Reporting https://www.esma.europa.eu/data-reporting/emir-reporting - ESMA 2022 Report on Quality and Use of Transaction Data https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-04/ESMA74-427719_2022_Report_on_Quality_and_Use_of_Transaction_Data.pdf - ESRB’s view regarding data quality issues and risks for financial stability https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/esrb.letter220713_on_data_quality_issues~18eccb 6993.en.pdf