Règlement grand-ducal du 10 mars 2014 sur le certificat de qualification des entreprises exploitant des entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions et

(1)de la loi du 12 juillet 1996 portant réforme du Conseil d’Etat et considérant qu’il y a urgence; Sur le rapport de Notre Ministre du Développement durable et des Infrastructures et après délibération du Gouvernement en Conseil; Arrêtons: Art. 1er. Champ d’application Le présent règlement grand-ducal s’applique aux entreprises qui exploitent des entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions et hélicoptères sur le territoire du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, dénommées ci-après «les exploitants». Sans préjudice notamment d’autres conditions complémentaires, techniques, économiques ou sociales qui peuvent exister par ailleurs, le règlement prescrit les conditions techniques applicables aux exploitants, énoncées dans les codes JARFSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H). Les codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H) figurent à l’annexe I respectivement à l’annexe II du présent règlement et en font partie intégrante. Art. 2. Modalités et conditions d’obtention du certificat de qualification des exploitants d’entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions et hélicoptères Pour l’exercice de leurs activités de simulation de vol, les exploitants désignés à l’article 1er doivent être titulaires d’un certificat de qualification les autorisant à pratiquer la simulation de vol, délivré par la Direction de l’Aviation Civile (DAC) en conformité avec les dispositions afférentes des codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H). Les codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H) régissent l’octroi et le renouvellement du certificat de qualification ainsi que l’extension de son champ d’application. L’octroi du certificat autorisant la pratique de la simulation de vol est soumis en particulier à la condition que l’exploitant ait nommé un dirigeant responsable ainsi qu’un responsable qualité conformément au paragraphe A.025 du code JAR-FSTD (A) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions respectivement au paragraphe H.025 du code JAR-FSTD (H) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour hélicoptères. Les responsables en question doivent être agréés par la DAC. Les conditions d’obtention d’un certificat de qualification permettant la pratique de la simulation de vol sont régies par le paragraphe A.030. du code JAR-FSTD (A) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions ainsi que par le paragraphe H.030. du code JAR-FSTD (H) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour hélicoptères. Art. 3. Durée de validité du certificat de qualification La durée de validité du certificat de qualification initial autorisant à pratiquer les activités de simulation de vol est d’une année. Le certificat peut être prolongé d’année en année sur demande expresse de l’exploitant. Les modalités entourant cette durée de validité sont régies par le paragraphe A.020 du code JAR-FSTD (A) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions ainsi que par le paragraphe H.020 du code JAR-FSTD (H) pour les entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour hélicoptères. Art. 4. Retrait du certificat de qualification La DAC peut prononcer le retrait temporaire ou définitif du certificat de qualification autorisant à pratiquer les activités de simulation de vol ou limiter le domaine d’activité du titulaire du certificat, notamment lorsque:

1. a)les conditions régissant l’octroi du certificat de qualification autorisant à pratiquer les activités de simulation de vol ne sont plus remplies;
2. b)des dispositions qui s’avèrent déterminantes pour l’octroi du certificat de qualification ont été violées de manière grave ou répétée; 1985 LUXEMBOURG
3. c)l’accès à l’entreprise de l’exploitant est interdit à la DAC ainsi qu’aux services compétents désignés à l’article 7 ci-après, ou que l’exploitant refuse de fournir à la DAC les documents requis pour contrôler l’application des dispositions du présent règlement et des codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H). Art. 5. Dispositions techniques Le ministre peut, sur proposition de la Direction de l’aviation civile et dans le but d’assurer un maniement adéquat des entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions ou hélicoptères, édicter sous forme d’un règlement des instructions ou des directives qui s’adressent aux exploitants et qui ont pour objet de soumettre à certaines conditions, limiter, voire interdire certaines opérations. Ces dispositions techniques énoncent les motifs justifiant leur diffusion et précisent leur champ d’application. Ils indiquent les mesures que doivent prendre les exploitants pour leur application et complètent les dispositions des codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H). Art. 6. Exceptions Dans des cas dûment motivés, la DAC peut, à titre exceptionnel et provisoire, accorder des dérogations aux dispositions des codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H) lorsqu’elle estime que le besoin existe, notamment pour prévenir les cas de rigueur et, sous réserve du respect de toute condition supplémentaire qu’elle considère comme nécessaire, pour assurer, dans ces cas particuliers, un niveau d’opération jugé équivalent. Art. 7. Vérifications et surveillance La DAC peut effectuer les vérifications et la surveillance qu’elle juge nécessaires pour l’application du présent règlement. Elle peut également, en cas de besoin, avoir recours à cet effet à des organismes spécialisés habilités à cet effet. Art. 8. Dispositions transitoires La DAC peut, en fonction de la complexité technique, fixer à chaque exploitant un délai dans lequel ce dernier doit adapter son exploitation et son règlement interne aux dispositions du présent règlement. Ce délai ne peut pas dépasser un an à partir de la date d’entrée en vigueur du présent règlement. Les règlements internes en usage auprès des exploitants au moment de l’entrée en vigueur du présent règlement restent en vigueur jusqu’à leur remplacement par de nouveaux règlements internes. Les autorisations anciennes délivrées uniquement sur base des codes JAR-FSTD (A) et JAR-FSTD (H) sont réputées avoir été délivrées en conformité avec les dispositions du présent règlement. Art. 9. Disposition finale Notre Ministre du Développement durable et des Infrastructures est chargé de l’exécution du présent règlement qui sera publié au Mémorial. Château de Berg, le 10 mars 2014. Henri Le Ministre du Développement durable et des Infrastructures, François Bausch Annexe I Code JAR-FSTD (A) – Entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions Annexe II Code JAR – FSTD (H) – Entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour hélicoptères 1986 LUXEMBOURG Annexe I Code JAR-FSTD (A) – Entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour avions Joint Aviation Requirements JAR–FSTD A Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices Joint Aviation Authorities 1987 LUXEMBOURG Joint Aviation Requirements JAR–FSTD A Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices Initial issue 1 May 2008 All rights reserved Printed and distributed by Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, Colorado 80112, U S A on behalf of the Joint Aviation Authorities Committee. 1988 LUXEMBOURG The members of the Joint Aviation Authorities Committee are representatives of the Civil Aviation Authorities of the countries that have signed the ‘Arrangements Concerning the Development and the Acceptance of Joint Aviation Requirements’. A list of these countries is kept by European Civil Aviation Conference, 3 bis Villa Emile Bergerat, 92522 NEUILLY SUR SEINE Cedex, France.* Further copies of the Joint Aviation Requirements can be purchased from Information Handling Services (IHS), whose world-wide offices are listed on the JAA website (www.jaa.
4. nl)and IHS website (www.global.ihs.com) For electronic versions of Joint Aviation Authorities Documents please refer to the website of Information Handling Services (IHS) on www.ihsaviation.com, where you will find information on how to order. Enquiries regarding the contents should be addressed to the JAA, Saturnusstraat 40-44, PO Box 3000, 2130 KA HOOFDDORP, The Netherlands (publications@jaat.eu). *These countries are: Albania, Armenia, Austria, [Azerbaijan], Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, European Aviation Safety Agency, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, [Republic of Georgia], Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, & United Kingdom 01.05.08 ii 1989 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A CONTENTS (general layout) JAR–FSTD A AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES FOREWORD CHECK LIST OF PAGES PREAMBLE SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS SUBPART A — APPLICABILITY SUBPART B — GENERAL SUBPART C — AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES SECTION 2 – ADVISORY CIRCULARS JOINT (ACJ) ACJ B — GENERAL ACJ C — AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES C-1 01.05.08 1990 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 C-2 1991 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A CONTENTS (details) JAR–FSTD A AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES Paragraph Page SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS General and Presentation 1-0-1 SUBPART A – APPLICABILITY JAR–FSTD A.001 Applicability 1-A-1 Terminology 1-B-1 SUBPART B – GENERAL JAR–FSTD A.005 SUBPART C – AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES JAR–FSTD A.015 Application for FSTD Qualification 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD A.020 Validity FSTD Qualification 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD A.025 Rules governing FSTD Operators 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD A.030 Requirements for FSTDs qualified on or after 1 August 2008 1-C-2 JAR–FSTD A.031 Requirements for FFSs qualified on or after 1 April 1998 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD A.032 Requirements for FTDs qualified on or after 1 July 2000 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD A.033 Requirements for FNPTs qualified on or after 1 July 1999 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD A.034 Requirements for BITD qualified on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD A.035 Requirements for FFSs approved or qualified before 1 April 1998 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD A.036 Requirements for FTDs approved or qualified before 1 July 2000 1-C-4 Requirements for FNPTs approved or qualified 1-C-4 JAR–FSTD A.037 before 1 July 1999 JAR–FSTD A.040 Changes to qualified FSTDs 1-C-4 JAR–FSTD A.045 Interim FSTD Qualification 1-C-5 JAR–FSTD A.050 Transferability of FSTD Qualification 1-C-5 Appendix 1 to JAR–FSTD A.030 FSTD Standards 1-C-7 C-3 01.05.08 1992 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A Paragraph Page SECTION 2 – ADVISORY CIRCULARS JOINT (ACJ) General and Presentation 2-0-1 ACJ B – GENERAL ACJ FSTD A.005 Terminology, Abbreviations 2-B-1 ACJ C – AEROPLANE FSTDS ACJ No. 1 to JAR- FSTD A.015 FSTD Qualification – Application and Inspection 2-C-1 ACJ No. 2 to JAR- FSTD A.015 FSTD Evaluations 2-C-6 ACJ FSTD A.020 Validity of an FSTD Qualification 2-C-10 ACJ No. 1 to Quality System 2-C-10 ACJ No. 2 to JAR-FSTD A.025 BITD Operators Quality System 2-C-17 ACJ No. 3 to JAR-FSTD A.025 Installations 2-C-18 ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 FSTDs qualified on or after 1 August 2008 2-C-19 Appendix 1 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Validation Test Tolerances 2-C-112 Appendix 2 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Validation Data Roadmap 2-C-114 Appendix 3 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Data Requirements for Alternate Engines 2-C-116 Appendix 4 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Data Requirements for Alternate Avionics 2-C-118 Appendix 5 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Transport Delay Testing Method 2-C-119 Appendix 6 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Recurrent Evaluations – Validation Test Data Presentation 2-C-122 Appendix 7 to ACJ No 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Applicability 2-C-123 Appendix 8 to ACJ No 1 JAR–FSTD A.030 General technical Requirements for FSTD Qualification Levels 2-C-125 ACJ No. 2 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Guidance on Design and Qualification of Level “A” Aeroplane FFSs 2-C-130 ACJ No. 3 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Guidance on Design and Qualification of FNPTs 2-C-132 ACJ No. 4 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Guidance on Design and Qualification of BITDs 2-C-136 ACJ No.1 to JAR-FSTD A.030(c)

(1)Engineering Simulator Validation Data 2-C-140 JAR- FSTD A.025 01.05.08 C-4 1993 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A Paragraph Page ACJ No.2 to JAR-FSTD A.030(c)

(1)Engineering Simulator Validation Data – Approved Guidelines 2-C-141 ACJ to FSTD A.035 FFS Approved or Qualified before 1 April 1998 2-C-143 ACJ to FSTD A.036 FTD Approved or Qualified before 1 July 2000 2-C-145 ACJ to FSTD A.037 FNPT Approved or Qualified before 1 July 1999 2-C-146 ACJ to FSTD A.045 New Aeroplane FFS/FTD Qualification – Additional Information 2-C-147 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-5 01.05.08 1994 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 C-6 1995 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A FOREWORD 1 The Civil Aviation Authorities of certain European countries have agreed common comprehensive and detailed aviation requirements, referred to as Joint Aviation Requirements (JARs), with a view to minimising Type Certification problems on joint ventures, to facilitate the export and import of aviation products, to make it easier for maintenance carried out in one European country to be accepted by the Civil Aviation Authority in another European country and to regulate commercial air transport operations. 2 JARs are recognised by the Civil Aviation Authorities of participating countries as an acceptable basis for showing compliance with their national codes. 3 The content has been prepared using the expertise available in this field as well as the ICAO Document 9625, the ‘Manual for the Qualification of Flight Simulators’ and added to where necessary by making use of existing European regulations and the Federal Aviation Requirements of the United States of America where acceptable. 4 JAR–FSTD A is issued with no National Variants. It may be felt that the document does not contain all of the detailed compliance and interpretative information which some Civil Aviation Authorities and Industry organisations would like to see. However, it is accepted that JAR–FSTD A should be applied in practice and the lessons learned embodied in future amendments. The Civil Aviation Authorities of the JAA are therefore committed to early amendment in the light of experience. 5 Future development of the requirements of JAR–FSTD A, including the commitment in Paragraph 4, will be in accordance with the JAA’s Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) procedures. These procedures allow for the amendment of JAR–FSTD A to be proposed by any organisation or person. 6 The Civil Aviation Authorities have agreed they should not unilaterally initiate amendment of their national codes without having made a proposal for amendment of JAR–FSTD A in accordance with the agreed procedure. 7 Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in JAR–FSTD A that are considered generally applicable are contained in JAR–1, Definitions and Abbreviations. However, definitions and abbreviations of terms used in JAR–FSTD A that are specific to a Subpart of JAR–FSTD A are normally given in the Subpart concerned or, exceptionally, in the associated compliance or interpretative material. 8 Amendments to the text in JAR–FSTD A are issued as Replacement Pages. These show an effective date and have the same status and applicability as JAR–FSTD A from that date. 9 New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent ‘Amendment’ is issued. 10 Comment/Response documents developed following Notices of Proposed Amendment (NPA) consultation have been produced by the JAA and are published on the JAA Internet Site: www.jaa.nl. Readers can also apply to JAA for copies of specific Comment/Response Documents as required. F-1 01.05.08 1996 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 F-2 1997 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A JOINT AVIATION REQUIREMENTS CHECK LIST OF PAGES JAR-FSTD A - AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES Initial issue dated 01 May 2008 The following pages of JAR-FSTD A are now current: Page No Legend Date Title Page ii Initial issue Initial issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 F-1 F-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-1 CL-2 CL-3 CL-4 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 P-1 P-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-0-1 1-0-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-A-1 1-A-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-B-1 1-B-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-C-1 1-C-2 1-C-3 1-C-4 1-C-5 1-C-6 1-C-7 1-C-8 1-C-9 1-C-10 1-C-11 1-C-12 1-C-13 1-C-14 1-C-15 1-C-16 1-C-17 1-C-18 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-1 01.05.08 1998 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A Paragraph Legend Page 1-C-19 1-C-20 1-C-21 1-C-22 1-C-23 1-C-24 1-C-25 1-C-26 1-C-27 1-C-28 1-C-29 1-C-30 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-0-1 2-0-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-B-1 2-B-2 2-B-3 2-B-4 2-B-5 2-B-6 2-B-7 2-B-8 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-C-1 2-C-2 2-C-3 2-C-4 2-C-5 2-C-6 2-C-7 2-C-8 2-C-9 2-C-10 2-C-11 2-C-12 2-C-13 2-C-14 2-C-15 2-C-16 2-C-17 2-C-18 2-C-19 2-C-20 2-C-21 2-C-22 2-C-23 2-C-24 2-C-25 2-C-26 2-C-27 2-C-28 2-C-29 2-C-30 2-C-31 2-C-32 2-C-33 2-C-34 2-C-35 2-C-36 2-C-37 2-C-38 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-2 1999 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A Paragraph Legend Page 2-C-39 2-C-40 2-C-41 2-C-42 2-C-43 2-C-44 2-C-45 2-C-46 2-C-47 2-C-48 2-C-49 2-C-50 2-C-51 2-C-52 2-C-53 2-C-54 2-C-55 2-C-56 2-C-57 2-C-58 2-C-59 2-C-60 2-C-61 2-C-62 2-C-63 2-C-64 2-C-65 2-C-66 2-C-67 2-C-68 2-C-69 2-C-70 2-C-71 2-C-72 2-C-73 2-C-74 2-C-75 2-C-76 2-C-77 2-C-78 2-C-79 2-C-80 2-C-81 2-C-82 2-C-83 2-C-84 2-C-85 2-C-86 2-C-87 2-C-88 2-C-89 2-C-90 2-C-91 2-C-92 2-C-93 2-C-94 2-C-95 2-C-96 2-C-97 2-C-98 2-C-99 2-C-100 2-C-101 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-3 01.05.08 2000 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A Paragraph Legend Page 2-C-102 2-C-103 2-C-104 2-C-105 2-C-106 2-C-107 2-C-108 2-C-109 2-C-110 2-C-111 2-C-112 2-C-113 2-C-114 2-C-115 2-C-116 2-C-117 2-C-118 2-C-119 2-C-120 2-C-121 2-C-122 2-C-123 2-C-124 2-C-125 2-C-126 2-C-127 2-C-128 2-C-129 2-C-130 2-C-131 2-C-132 2-C-133 2-C-134 2-C-135 2-C-136 2-C-137 2-C-138 2-C-139 2-C-140 2-C-141 2-C-142 2-C-143 2-C-144 2-C-145 2-C-146 2-C-147 2-C-148 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-4 2001 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A PREAM BLE JAR–FSTD A Initial Issue JAR–FSTD A comprises 3 Subparts (A, B and C) in Section 1, and 2 Subparts (B and C) in Section

1. JAR-FSTD A is a simple amalgamation of JAR STD 1A, 2A, 3A and 4A into one document. Section 1 Subpart C Terminology and basic regulatory processes combined Table of Standards in Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 contains the standard for all devices Section 2 Subpart B Terminology and Abbreviations rationalised and harmonised with Aircraft STD standards documents. Subpart C Regulatory Processes combined. Table of Objective Tests (ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.030) contains the testing requirements for all devices. Table of Functions and Subjective Tests (ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.030) contains the testing requirements for all devices. P-1 01.05.08 2002 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 P-2 2003 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 – REQUIREM ENTS 1 GENERAL 1.1 This Section contains the requirements for aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices. 2 PRESENTATION 2.1 The requirements of JAR–FSTD A are presented in two columns on loose pages, each page being identified by the date of issue and the Amendment number under which it is amended or reissued. 2.2 Sub-headings are in italic typeface. 2.3 Explanatory Notes not forming part of the requirements appear in smaller typeface. 2.4 New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent ‘Amendment’ is issued. 2.5 After each paragraph, the various changes and amendments, if any since the initial issue, are indicated together with their date of issue. 1-0-1 01.05.08 2004 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-0-2 2005 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR–FSTD A SUBPART A – APPLICABILITY JAR–FSTD A.001 Applicability JAR–FSTD A as amended applies to those persons, organisations or enterprises (Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTD) operators) or, in the case of BITDs only, manufacturers seeking initial qualification of FSTDs. The version of JAR-FSTD A agreed by the Authority and used for issue of the initial qualification shall be applicable for future recurrent qualifications of the FSTD unless recategorised. FSTD users shall also gain approval to use the FSTD as part of their approved training programmes despite the fact that the FSTD has been previously qualified. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-A-1 01.05.08 2006 LUXEMBOURG JAR–FSTD A SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-A-2 2007 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A SUBPART B - GENERAL (JAR-FSTD A.005 continued) JAR–FSTD A.005 Terminology (See ACJ to FSTD A.005) for training where a complete flight deck environment is not necessary. (g) Flight Simulation Training Device User Approval (FSTD User Approval). The extent to which an FSTD of a specified Qualification Level may be used by persons, organisations or enterprises as approved by the Authority. It takes account of aeroplane to FSTD differences and the operating and training ability of the organisation. Because of the technical complexity of FSTD qualification, it is essential that standard terminology is used throughout. The following principal terms and abbreviations shall be used in order to comply with JAR–FSTD (A). Further terms and abbreviations are contained in ACJ to FSTD A.
2. (a) Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD). A training device which is a Full Flight Simulator (FFS), a Flight Training Device (FTD), a Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT) , or a Basic Instrument Training Device (BITD). (h) Flight Simulation Training Device Operator (FSTD operator). That person, organisation or enterprise directly responsible to the Authority for requesting and maintaining the qualification of a particular FSTD. (b) Full Flight Simulator (FFS). A full size replica of a specific type or make, model and series aeroplane flight deck, including the assemblage of all equipment and computer programmes necessary to represent the aeroplane in ground and flight operations, a visual system providing an out of the flight deck view, and a force cueing motion system. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for FFS Qualification. (i) Flight Simulation Training Device User (FSTD User). The person, organisation or enterprise requesting training, checking and testing credits through the use of an FSTD. (j) Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification (FSTD Qualification). The level of technical ability of an FSTD as defined in the compliance document. (k) BITD Manufacturer. That organisation or enterprise being directly responsible to the Authority for requesting the initial BITD model qualification. (c) Flight Training Device (FTD). A full size replica of a specific aeroplane type’s instruments, equipment, panels and controls in an open flight deck area or an enclosed aeroplane flight deck, including the assemblage of equipment and computer software programmes necessary to represent the aeroplane in ground and flight conditions to the extent of the systems installed in the device. It does not require a force cueing motion or visual system. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for a specific FTD Level of Qualification. (l) BITD Model. A defined hardware and software combination, which has obtained a qualification. Each BITD will equate to a specific model and be a serial numbered unit. (m) Qualification Test Guide (QTG). A document designed to demonstrate that the performance and handling qualities of an FSTD agree within prescribed limits with those of the aeroplane and that all applicable regulatory requirements have been met. The QTG includes both the aeroplane and FSTD data used to support the validation. (d) Flight and Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT). A training device which represents the flight deck or cockpit environment including the assemblage of equipment and computer programmes necessary to represent an aeroplane or class of aeroplane in flight operations to the extent that the systems appear to function as in an aeroplane. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for a specific FNPT Level of Qualification. (e) Basic Instrument Training Device (BITD). A ground based training device which represents the student pilot‘s station of a class of aeroplanes. It may use screen based instrument panels and springloaded flight controls, providing a training platform for at least the procedural aspects of instrument flight. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (f) Other Training Device (OTD). A training aid other than FFS, FTD, FNPT or BITD which provides 1-B-1 01.05.08 2008 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-B-2 2009 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A SUBPART C – AEROPLANE FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES JAR-FSTD A.020(d) (continued) JAR–FSTD A.015 Application for FSTD Qualification (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD A.015) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD A.015) (d) The qualification of each BITD model serial number is valid for 36 months from the commencement of operation, unless reduced by the Authority. It is the operator‘s responsibility to apply for the revalidation of the qualification. (a) The FSTD operator requiring evaluation of a FFS, FTD or FNPT shall apply to the Authority giving 3 months notice. In exceptional cases this period may be reduced to one month at the discretion of the Authority. JAR–FSTD A.025 Rules Governing FSTD Operators (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD A.025) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD A.025) (See ACJ No. 3 to JARFSTD A.025) (b) An FSTD Qualification Certificate will be issued following satisfactory completion of an evaluation of the FFS, FTD or FNPT by the Authority. (c) For BITDs the manufacturer of a new BITD model which requires evaluation shall apply to the Authority giving 3 months notice. In exceptional cases this period may be reduced to one month at the discretion of the Authority. The FSTD operator shall demonstrate his capability to maintain the performance, functions and other characteristics specified for the FSTD Qualification Level as follows: (a) Quality System (d) A BITD Qualification Certificate will be issued for the BITD model to the manufacturer following satisfactory completion of an initial evaluation by the Authority. This qualification certificate is valid for any devices manufactured to this standard without the need for the device to be subjected to further technical evaluation. The BITD model must clearly be identified by a BITD model number.

(1)A Quality System shall be established and a Quality Manager designated to monitor compliance with, and the adequacy of, procedures required to ensure the maintenance of the Qualification Level of FSTDs. Compliance monitoring shall include a feedback system to the Accountable Manager to ensure corrective action as necessary. (e) The numbering of the BITD model must clearly define the hardware and software configuration of the qualified BITD model. A running serial number shall follow the BITD model identification number.

(2)The Quality System shall include a Quality Assurance Programme that contains procedures designed to verify that the specified performance, functions and characteristics are being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements, standards and procedures. JAR–FSTD A.020 Validity of FSTD Qualification (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.020)

(3)The Quality System and the Quality Manager shall be acceptable to the Authority.

(4)The Quality System shall described in relevant documentation. (

1. a)An FSTD qualification is valid for 12 months unless otherwise specified by the Authority. be (
2. b)Updating. A link shall be maintained between the operator’s organization, the Authority and the relevant manufacturers to incorporate important modifications, especially: (
3. b)An FSTD qualification revalidation can take place at any time within the 60 days prior to the expiry of the validity of the qualification document. The new period of validity shall continue from the expiry date of the previous qualification document.

(1)Aeroplane modifications that are essential for training and checking shall be introduced into all affected FSTDs whether or not enforced by an airworthiness directive. (c) The Authority shall refuse, revoke, suspend or vary an FSTD qualification, if the provisions of JAR–FSTD A are not satisfied.

(2)Modification of FSTDs, including motion and visual systems (where applicable): 1-C-1 01.05.08 2010 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A.025(

1. b)(continued) (
2. i)When essential for training and checking, FSTD operators shall update their FSTDs (for example in the light of data revisions). Modifications of the FSTD hardware and software that affect handling, performance and systems operation or any major modifications of the motion or visual system shall be evaluated to determine the impact on the original qualification criteria. FSTD operators shall prepare amendments for any affected validation tests. The FSTD operator shall test the FSTD to the new criteria. JAR–FSTD A.030 Requirements for FSTD qualified on or after 1 August 2008 (See Appendix 1 to JAR– FSTD A.030) (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD A.030) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD A.030) (See ACJ No. 3 to JARFSTD A.030) (See ACJ No. 4 to JARFSTD A.030) (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD A.030(c)

(1)) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD A.030(c)

(1)) (

1. ii)The Authority shall be advised in advance of any major changes to determine if the tests carried out by the FSTD operator are satisfactory. A special evaluation of the FSTD may be necessary prior to returning it to training following the modification. (
2. a)Any FSTD submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 August 2008 will be evaluated against applicable JAR–FSTD A criteria for the Qualification Levels applied for. Recurrent evaluations of a FSTD will be based on the same version of JAR-FSTD A that was applicable for its initial evaluation. An upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD A.

(3)BITD operators shall maintain a link between their own organisation, the Authority and the BITD manufacturer to incorporate important modifications. (

1. b)A FSTD shall be assessed in those areas that are essential to completing the flight crewmember training and checking process as applicable. (
2. c)Installations. Ensure that the FSTD is housed in a suitable environment that supports safe and reliable operation. (
3. c)The FSTD shall be subjected to:

(1)The FSTD operator shall ensure that the FSTD and its installation comply with the local regulations for health and safety. However, as a minimum all FSTD occupants and maintenance personnel shall be briefed on FSTD safety to ensure that they are aware of all safety equipment and procedures in the FSTD in case of emergency.

(1)Validation tests and

(2)Functions & subjective tests (

1. d)Data shall be of a standard that satisfies the Authority before the FSTD can gain a Qualification Level. (
2. e)The FSTD operator shall submit a QTG in a form and manner that is acceptable to the Authority.

(2)The FSTD safety features such as emergency stops and emergency lighting shall be checked at least annually and recorded by the FSTD operator. (

1. f)The QTG will only be approved after completion of an initial or upgrade evaluation, and when all the discrepancies in the QTG have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Authority. After inclusion of the results of the tests witnessed by the Authority, the approved QTG becomes the Master QTG (MQTG), which is the basis for the FSTD qualification and subsequent recurrent FSTD evaluations. A copy of the MQTG shall be delivered by the BITD manufacteurer together with any BITD model delivered to an Operator. (
2. d)Additional Equipment. Where additional equipment has been added to the FSTD, even though not required for qualification, it will be assessed to ensure that it does not adversely affect the quality of training. Therefore any subsequent modification, removal or unserviceability could affect the qualification of the device. (
3. g)The FSTD operator shall:

(1)Run the complete set of tests contained within the MQTG progressively between each annual evaluation by the Authority. Results shall be dated and retained in 01.05.08 1-C-2 2011 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A JAR-FSTD A.030(g) (continued) JAR-FSTD A.033 (continued) order to satisfy both the FSTD operator and the Authority that FSTD standards are being maintained; and current validity period. This re-evaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 3A, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JARFSTD A. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD A.

(2)Establish a Configuration Control System to ensure the continued integrity of the hardware and software of the qualified FSTD. JAR-FSTD A.031 Requirements for FFS qualified on or after 1 April 1998 and before 1 August 2008 JAR-FSTD A.034 Requirements for Basic Instrument Training Devices (BITD) qualified on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008 Any FFS submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 April 1998 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD A with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This re-evaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 1A, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JARFSTD A. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD A. Any BITD submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD A with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This re-evaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 4A, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JARFSTD A. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD A. JAR-FSTD A.032 Requirements for Flight Training Devices (FTD) qualified on or after 1 July 2000 and before 1 August 2008 JAR–FSTD A.035 Requirements for Full Flight Simulators approved or qualified before 1 April 1998 (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.035) Any FTD submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 January 2000 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD A with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This re-evaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with of the same version of JAR-STD 2A, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JAR-FSTD A. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD A. (a) FFS approved or qualified in accordance with national regulations of JAA Member States before 1 April 1998 will either be recategorised or will continue to maintain their approval under the Grandfather Rights provision, in accordance with sub-paragraphs (c) and (d) below. For FFS that are not re-categorized, maximum credit shall under no circumstances exceed originally issued National credits. (b) FFS’s, neither previously recategorised nor with an approval maintained under the Grandfather Rights provision, will be qualified in accordance with JAR–FSTD A.030. JAR-FSTD A.033 Requirements for Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainers (FNPT) qualified on or after 1 July 1999 and before 1August 2008 (c) FFS that are not recategorised but that have a primary reference document used for their testing, may be qualified by the Authority to an equivalent JAR–FSTD A Qualification Level, either AG, BG, CG or DG. An upgrade requires the recategorisation of the FFS. Any FNPT submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 July 1999 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD A with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the

(1)To gain and maintain an equivalent Qualification Level, these FFS shall be assessed 1-C-3 01.05.08 2012 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A.035(c) (continued) JAR-FSTD A.036 (continued) in those areas that are essential to completing the flight crewmember training and checking process, as applicable.

(2)(

1. v)Functioning during normal, abnormal, emergency and, where applicable non normal operation; The FFS shall be subjected to: (
2. vi)Instructor station function and FTD control, and (
3. i)Validation tests; and (
4. ii)Functions and subjective tests. (vii) Certain additional requirements depending on the Qualification Level and the installed equipment. (
5. d)FFS that are not recategorised and that do not have a primary reference document used for their testing shall be qualified by special arrangement. Such FFS will be issued with a Special Category and shall be subjected to functions and subjective tests corresponding to those detailed in this document. In addition any previously recognised validation test shall be used.

(2)Tests. Functions and Subjective

(3)In addition any previously recognised Validation Test shall be used. JAR–FSTD A.037 Requirements for Flight Navigation and Procedures Trainers approved or qualified before 1 July 1999 (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.037) (c) FTDs that are not recategorised but that have a primary reference document used for their testing may be qualified by the Authority to an equivalent JAR–FSTD Qualification Level, either 1G or 2G. These Qualification Levels refer to similar credits achieved by JAR–FSTD A Level 1 and 2. (No Longer Applicable) JAR–FSTD A.040 Changes FSTD

(1)To gain and maintain an equivalent Qualification Level, these FTDs shall be assessed in those areas which are essential to completing the flight crew member training and checking process, including: to qualified (

1. a)Requirement to notify major changes to a FSTD. The operator of a qualified FSTD shall inform the Authority of proposed major changes such as: (
2. i)Longitudinal, lateral and directional handling qualities (where applicable);

(1)Aeroplane modifications, could affect FSTD qualification. which

(2)FSTD hardware and or software modifications that could affect the handling qualities, performances or system representations. (ii) Performance on the ground and in the air; 01.05.08 (ii)

(2)These FTDs shall be subjected to the same Functions and Subjective Tests referred to in JAR–FSTD A.036(c)

(2)(ii). (

1. b)FTDs, neither previously recategorised nor with an approval maintained under the Grandfather Rights provision, will be qualified in accordance with JAR–FSTD A.030. (
2. iv)Validation Tests, and

(1)Such FTDs will be issued with Special Categories. (

1. a)FTDs approved or qualified in accordance with national regulations of JAA Members States before 1 July 2000 either will be recategorised or will continue to maintain their approval under the Grandfather Rights provision, in accordance with JAR–FSTD A.036(
2. c)and JAR–FSTD A.036 (d). operations (
3. i)(
4. d)FTDs that are not recategorised and that do not have a primary reference document used for their testing shall be qualified by special arrangement. JAR–FSTD A.036 Requirements for Flight Training Devices approved or qualified before 1 July 2000 (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD A.036) (iii) Specific applicable; The FTD shall be subjected to: where Flight deck configuration; 1-C-4

(3)Relocation of the FSTD; and

(4)Any deactivation of the FSTD. 2013 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A JAR-FSTD A.040 (continued) The Authority may complete a special evaluation following major changes or when a FSTD appears not to be performing at its initial Qualification Level. JAR–FSTD A.045 Interim FSTD Qualification (See ACJ to FSTD A.045) (

1. a)In case of new aeroplane programmes, special arrangements shall be made to enable an interim Qualification Level to be achieved. (
2. b)Upgrade of a FSTD. A FSTD may be upgraded to a higher Qualification Level. Special evaluation is required before the award of a higher Level of Qualification. (
3. b)For Full Flight Simulators, an Interim Qualification Level will only be granted at levels A, B or C.

(1)If an upgrade is proposed the FSTD operator shall seek the advice of the Authority and give full details of the modifications. If the upgrade evaluation does not fall upon the anniversary of the original qualification date, a special evaluation is required to permit the FSTD to continue to qualify even at the previous Qualification Level. (c) Requirements, details relating to the issue, and the period of validity of an interim Qualification Level will be decided by the Authority. JAR–FSTD A.050 Transferability Qualification

(2)In the case of a FSTD upgrade, an FSTD operator shall run all validation tests for the requested Qualification Level. Results from previous evaluations shall not be used to validate FSTD performance for the current upgrade. of FSTD When there is a change of FSTD operator: (

1. a)The new FSTD operator shall advise the Authority in advance in order to agree upon a plan of transfer of the FSTD. (
2. b)At the discretion of the Authority, the FSTD shall be subject to an evaluation in accordance with its original JAA qualification criteria. (
3. c)Relocation of a FSTD

(1)In instances where a FSTD is moved to a new location, the Authority shall be advised before the planned activity along with a schedule of related events. (

1. c)Provided that the FSTD performs to its original standard, its original Qualification Level shall be restored. Revised user approval(
2. s)may also be required.

(2)Prior to returning the FSTD to service at the new location, the FSTD operator shall perform at least one third of the validation tests and, functions and subjective tests to ensure that the FSTD performance meets its original qualification standard. A copy of the test documentation shall be retained together with the FSTD records for review by the Authority.

(3)An evaluation of the FSTD in accordance with its original JAA qualification criteria shall be at the discretion of the Authority. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (d) Deactivation of a currently qualified FSTD

(1)If a FSTD operator plans to remove a FSTD from active status for prolonged periods, the Authority shall be notified and suitable controls established for the period during which the FSTD is inactive.

(2)The FSTD operator shall agree a procedure with the Authority to ensure that the FSTD can be restored to active status at its original Qualification Level. 1-C-5 01.05.08 2014 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-C-6 2015 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 Flight Simulation Training Device Standards This appendix describes the minimum Full Flight Simulator (FFS), Flight Training Device (FTD), Flight and Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT) and Basic Instrument Training Devices (BITD) requirements for qualifying devices to the required Qualification Levels. Certain requirements included in this section shall be supported with a statement of compliance (SOC) and, in some designated cases, an objective test. The SOC will describe how the requirement was met. The test results shall show that the requirement has been attained. In the following tabular listing of FSTD standards, statements of compliance are indicated in the compliance column. For FNPT use in Multi-Crew Co-operation (MCC) training the general technical requirement are expressed in the MCC column with additional systems, instrumentation and indicators as required for MCC training and operation. For MCC (Multi Crew Co-operation) minimum technical requirements are as for Level II, with the following additions or amendments: 1 2 Turbo-jet or turbo-prop engines. Performance reserves, in case of an engine failure, to be in accordance with JAR-

1. These may be simulated by a reduction in the aeroplane gross mass. 3 Retractable landing gear. 4 Pressurisation system. 5 De-icing systems 6 Fire detection / suppression system 7 Dual controls 8 Autopilot with automatic approach mode 9 2 VHF transceivers including oxygen masks intercom system 10 2 VHF NAV receivers (VOR, ILS, DME) 11 1 ADF receiver 12 1 Marker receiver 13 1 transponder The following indicators shall be located in the same positions on the instrument panels of both pilots: 1 Airspeed 2 Flight attitude with flight director 3 Altimeter 4 Flight director with ILS (HSI) 5 Vertical speed 6 ADF 7 VOR 8 Marker indication (as appropriate) 9 Stop watch (as appropriate) INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-C-7 01.05.08 01.05.08 Flight deck, a full scale replica of the aeroplane simulated. a.3 a.4 A cockpit/flight deck sufficiently enclosed to exclude distraction, which will replicate that of the aeroplane or class of aeroplane simulated a.2 1-C-8 Direction of movement of controls and switches identical to that in the aeroplane. The flight deck, for FSTD purposes, consists of all that space forward of a cross section of the fuselage at the most extreme aft setting of the pilots' seats. Additional required flight crewmember duty stations and those required bulkheads aft of the pilot seats are also considered part of the flight deck and shall replicate the aeroplane. Equipment for operation of the cockpit windows shall be included in the FSTD, but the actual windows need not be operable. A fully enclosed flight deck General a.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Bulkheads containing only items such as landing gear pin storage compartments, fire axes or extinguishers, spare light bulbs, aircraft document pouches etc. are not considered essential and may be omitted. Such items, or reasonable facsimile, shall still be available in the FSTD but may be relocated to a suitable location as near as practical to the original position. Fire axes and any similar purpose instruments need only be represented in silhouette. Bulkheads containing items such as switches, circuit breakers, supplementary radio panels, etc. to which the flight crew may require access during any event after pre-flight cockpit preparation is complete are considered essential and may not be omitted. Flight deck observer seats are not considered to be additional flight crewmember duty stations and may be omitted. COMPLIANCE 2016 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 1-C-9 Crew members seats shall be provided with sufficient adjustment to allow the occupant to achieve the design eye reference position appropriate to the aeroplane or class of aeroplane and for the visual system to be installed to align with that eye position. Circuit breakers that affect procedures and/or result in observable cockpit indications properly located and functionally accurate. b.1 Cockpit/flight deck switches, instruments, equipment, panels, systems, primary and secondary flight controls sufficient for the training events to be accomplished shall be located in a spatially correct flight deck area and will operate as, and represent those in, that aeroplane or class of aeroplane. a.6 a.7 A full size panel of replicated system(s) which will have actuation of controls and switches that replicate those of the aeroplane simulated. General a.5 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For BITDs the switches and controls size and shape and their location in the cockpit shall be representative. For Multi-Crew Co-operation (MCC) qualification additional instrumentation and indicators may be required. See table at start of this appendix.. The use of electronically displayed images with physical overlay incorporating operable switches, knobs, buttons replicating aeroplane instruments panels may be acceptable. COMPLIANCE 2017 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 Communications, navigation, and caution and warning equipment corresponding to that installed in the applicant’s aeroplane with operation within the tolerances prescribed for the applicable airborne equipment. Navigation equipment corresponding to that of the replicated aeroplane or class of aeroplanes, with operation within the tolerances prescribed for the actual airborne equipment. This shall include communication equipment (interphone and air/ground communications systems). e.2 e.1 1 Lighting environment for panels and instruments shall be sufficient for the operation being conducted. D d.2 C All relevant instrument indications involved in the simulation of the applicable aeroplane shall automatically respond to control movement by a flight crewmember or induced disturbance to the simulated aeroplane; e.g., turbulence or wind shear. B d.1 A 1-C-10 2 FTD LEVEL Flight dynamics model that accounts for various combinations of drag and thrust normally encountered in flight corresponding to actual flight conditions, including the effect of change in aeroplane attitude, sideslip, thrust, drag, altitude, temperature, gross weight, moments of inertia, centre of gravity location, and configuration. General FFS LEVEL c.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For FTD 1 applies where the appropriate systems are replicated. For FTD Level 2 lighting environment shall be as per aeroplane. For BITDs instrument indications sufficient for the training events to be accomplished. Reference ACJ No. 4 to JAR-FSTD A.
2. For FNPTs instrument indications sufficient for the training events to be accomplished. Reference ACJ No. 3 to JAR-FSTD A.
3. For FNPTs and BITDs class specific modelling is acceptable. For FTD Levels 1 and 2 aerodynamic modelling sufficient to permit accurate systems operation and indication is acceptable. COMPLIANCE 2018 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 f.1 e.3 General In addition to the flight crewmember duty stations, three suitable seats for the instructor, delegated examiner and Authority inspector. The Authority will consider options to this standard based on unique cockpit configurations. These seats shall provide adequate vision to the pilot’s panel and forward windows. Observer seats need not represent those found in the aeroplane but in the case of FSTDs fitted with a motion system, the seats shall be adequately secured to the floor of the FSTD, fitted with positive restraint devices and be of sufficient integrity to safely restrain the occupant during any known or predicted motion system excursion. Navigational data with the corresponding approach facilities. Navigation aids should be usable within range without restriction. 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD 1-C-11 For BITDs suitable viewing arrangements for the Instructor should be provided. For FTDs and FNPT’s suitable seating arrangements for the Instructor and Examiner or Authority’s Inspector should be provided. For FNPTs and BITDs complete navigational data for at least 5 different European airports with corresponding precision and non-precision approach procedures including current updating within a period of 3 months. For all FFSs and FTDs 2 where used for area or airfield competence training or checking, navigation data should be updated within 28 days. For FTD 1 applies where navigation equipment is replicated. COMPLIANCE 2019 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 Instructor controls shall enable the operator to control all required system variables and insert abnormal or emergency conditions into the aeroplane systems. h.1 A FSTD systems shall simulate applicable aeroplane system operation, both on the ground and in flight. Systems shall be operative to the extent that all normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures can be accomplished. General g.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Position and flight freeze. A facility to enable the dynamic plotting of the flight path on approaches, commencing at the final approach fix, including the vertical profile Hard copy of map and approach plot - - Where applicable and as required for training the following shall be available : For FTD Level 1, applies where system is simulated. For FNPTs systems shall be operative to the extent that it shall be possible to perform all normal, abnormal and emergency operations as may be appropriate to the aeroplane or class of aeroplanes being simulated and as required for the training. COMPLIANCE 2020 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 1-C-12 i.1 General Control forces and control travel shall correspond to that of the replicated aeroplane. Control forces shall react in the same manner as in the aeroplane under the same flight conditions. 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD In addition for FNPT Level II and MCC control forces and control travels shall respond in the same manner under the same flight conditions as in the aeroplane or class of aeroplane being simulated. For FNPT Level I and BITDs control forces and control travel shall broadly correspond to that of the replicated aeroplane or class of aeroplane. Control force changes due to an increase/decrease in aircraft speed are not necessary. For FTD Level 2 Control forces and control travel should correspond to that of the replicated aeroplane with CT&M. It is not intended that the device should be flown manually other than for short periods when the autopilot is temporarily disengaged. COMPLIANCE 2021 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 1-C-13 01.05.08 01.05.08 j.1 General Ground reaction – reaction of the aeroplane upon contact with the runway during landing to include strut deflections, tyre friction, side forces, and other appropriate data, such as weight and speed, necessary to identify the flight condition and configuration. Ground handling characteristics – steering inputs to include crosswind, braking, thrust reversing, deceleration and turning radius.

(3)Ground Effect. For example: round-out, flare, and touchdown. This requires data on lift, drag, pitching moment, trim, and power ground effect.

(1)Ground handling and aerodynamic programming shall include: 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For FNPTs a generic ground handling model need only be provided to enable representative flare and touch down effects. For Level ‘A’ FFS, generic ground handling to the extent that allows turns within the confines of the runway, adequate control on flare, touchdown and roll-out (including from a cross -wind landing) only is acceptable. Statement of Compliance required. Tests required. COMPLIANCE 2022 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 1-C-14 l.1 k.1 General 1-C-15 At lift-off During initial climb Short final approach

(4)Instructor controls for environmental effects including wind speed and direction shall be provided. Prior to take-off rotation

(1)Windshear models shall provide training in the specific skills required for recognition of wind shear phenomena and execution of recovery manoeuvres. Such models shall be representative of measured or accident derived winds, but may include simplifications which ensure repeatable encounters. For example, models may consist of independent variable winds in multiple simultaneous components. Wind models shall be available for the following critical phases of flight: 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For FTDs environment modelling sufficient to permit accurate systems operation and indication. See ACJ No 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030, Para 2.3, g. Tests required. COMPLIANCE 2023 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-C-16 A means for quickly and effectively conducting daily testing of FSTD programming and hardware shall be available. Computer capacity, accuracy, resolution, and dynamic response shall be sufficient to fully support the overall fidelity, including its evaluation and testing. p.1 C o.1 B A Brake and tyre failure dynamics (including antiskid) and decreased brake efficiency due to brake temperatures shall be representative and based on aeroplane related data. Wet on rubber residue in touchdown zone. Patchy wet

(6)Icy

(3)Patchy icy Wet

(5)Dry

(1)Stopping and directional control forces shall be representative for at least the following runway conditions based on aeroplane related data: General FFS LEVEL n.1 m.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Statement of Compliance required. Statement of Compliance required. Subjective test is required for decreased braking efficiency due to brake temperature, if applicable. Statement of Compliance required. Objective Tests required for

(1),

(2),

(3), Subjective check for

(4),

(5),

(6). Statement of Compliance required. COMPLIANCE 2024 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 q.1 General For aeroplanes with irreversible control systems, measurements may be obtained on the ground if proper pitot static inputs are provided to represent conditions typical of those encountered in flight. Engineering validation or aeroplane manufacturer rationale will be submitted as justification to ground test or omit a configuration. For FSTDs requiring static and dynamic tests at the controls, special test fixtures will not be required during initial evaluation if the FSTD operator’s MQTG shows both text fixture results and alternate test method results such as computer data plots, which were obtained concurrently. Repetition of the alternate method during initial evaluation may then satisfy this requirement.

(2)Free response of the controls shall match that of the aeroplane within the tolerances specified. Initial and upgrade evaluations will include control free response (pitch, roll and yaw controller) measurements recorded at the controls. The measured responses shall correspond to those of the aeroplane in take-off, cruise, and landing configurations. Control feel dynamics shall replicate the aeroplane simulated. 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Tests required. COMPLIANCE 2025 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 1-C-17 01.05.08 01.05.08 r.1 General 1-C-18 (see next page)

(1)Transport Delay: A transport delay test may be used to demonstrate that the FSTD system response does not exceed 150 milliseconds. This test shall measure all the delay encountered by a step signal migrating from the pilot’s control through the control loading electronics and interfacing through all the simulation software modules in the correct order, using a handshaking protocol, finally through the normal output interfaces to the motion system, to the visual system and instrument displays. One of the following two methods is acceptable as a means to prove compliance: 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C D FFS LEVEL 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For Level ‘A’ & ‘B’ FFSs, and applicable systems for FTDs, FNPTs and BITDs the maximum permissible delay is 300 milliseconds. Tests required. COMPLIANCE 2026 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1

(2)General Latency: The visual system, flight deck instruments and initial motion system response shall respond to abrupt pitch, roll and yaw inputs from the pilot's position within 150 milliseconds of the time, but not before the time, when the aeroplane would respond under the same conditions. (continued) 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD COMPLIANCE 2027 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 1-C-19 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-C-20 Self-testing for FSTD hardware and programming to determine compliance with the FSTD performance tests shall be provided. Evidence of testing shall include FSTD number, date, time, conditions, tolerances, and the appropriate dependent variables portrayed in comparison with the aeroplane standard. w.1 Realistic aeroplane mass properties, including mass, centre of gravity and moments of inertia as a function of payload and fuel loading shall be implemented. v.1 Aerodynamic and ground reaction modelling for the effects of reverse thrust on directional control shall be provided. u.1 Modelling that includes the effects of airframe and engine icing. C t.1 B A Aerodynamic modelling shall be provided. This shall include, for aeroplanes issued an original type certificate after June 1980, low altitude level flight ground effect, Mach effect at high altitude, normal and reverse dynamic thrust effect on control surfaces, aeroelastic representations, and representations of non-linearities due to sideslip based on aeroplane flight test data provided by the manufacturer. General D FFS LEVEL s.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Statement of Compliance required. Tests required. Statement of Compliance required at initial evaluation. SOC shall include a range of tabulated target values to enable a demonstration of the mass properties model to be conducted from the instructor’s station. (page 2–C–44). Statement of Compliance required. SOC shall describe the effects that provide training in the specific skills required for recognition of icing phenomena and execution of recovery. Statement of Compliance required. Statement of Compliance required. Mach effect, aeroelastic representations, and non-linearities due to sideslip are normally included in the FSTD aerodynamic model. The Statement of Compliance shall address each of these items. Separate tests for thrust effects and a Statement of Compliance are required. COMPLIANCE 2028 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 Timely and permanent update of hardware and programming subsequent to aeroplane modification sufficient for the Qualification Level sought. Daily pre-flight documentation either in the daily log or in a location easily accessible for review is required. y.1 General x.1 1.1 FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C D FFS LEVEL 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD COMPLIANCE 2029 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 1-C-21 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-C-22 c.1 A means of recording response time as required. the motion

(3)Produce cues at least equivalent to those of a six-degrees-of-freedom synergistic platform motion system. Have a minimum of 3 degrees of freedom (pitch, roll & heave).

(2)Tests required. For FSTDs where motion systems are not specifically required, but have been added, they will be assessed to ensure that they do not adversely affect the qualification of the FSTD. COMPLIANCE Provide sufficient cueing, which may be of a generic nature to accomplish the required tasks. MCC

(1)II Statement of Compliance required. I A motion system shall: 2 BITD b.1 D 1 C B FNPT LEVEL Motion cues as perceived by the pilot shall be representative of the aeroplane, e.g. touchdown cues shall be a function of the simulated rate of descent. Motion system A FTD LEVEL FFS LEVEL a.1 2. FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS 2030 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 d.1 Motion system 1-C-23 Buffet in the air due to flap and spoiler/speedbrake extension. Approach to stall buffet. Touchdown cues for main and nose gear. Nose wheel scuffing. Thrust effect with brakes set.

(9)A 2 1 D B C FTD LEVEL FFS LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD For Level ‘A’FFS: Effects may be of a generic nature sufficient to accomplish the required tasks. COMPLIANCE Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 (See next page) Buffet during extension retraction of landing gear.

(4)and Bumps associated with the landing gear. Buffets on the ground due to spoiler/speedbrake extension and thrust reversal.

(3)Effects of runway rumble, oleo deflections, groundspeed, uneven runway, centreline lights and taxiway characteristics.

(1)Motion effects programming shall include: 2. FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS 2031 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 e.1 d.1 Motion system Engine malfunction damage. 1-C-24 and engine Characteristic motion vibrations that result from operation of the aeroplane in so far as vibration marks an event or aeroplane state that can be sensed at the flight deck shall be present. The FSTD shall be programmed and instrumented in such a manner that the characteristic vibration modes can be measured and compared with aeroplane data. Motion vibrations: Tests with recorded results that allow the comparison of relative amplitudes versus frequency are required.

(13)Tail and pod strike.

(11)Tyre failure dynamics.

(10)Mach and manoeuvre buffet. (continued)

1. FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A 2 1 D B C FTD LEVEL FFS LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Tests required. Statement of Compliance required. COMPLIANCE 2032 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 1-C-25 Continuous minimum collimated visual field-of-view of 45 degrees horizontal and 30 degrees vertical field of view simultaneously for each pilot. Continuous, cross-cockpit, minimum collimated visual field of view providing each pilot with 180 degrees horizontal and 40 degrees vertical field of view. Application of tolerances require the field of view to be not less than a total of 176 measured degrees horizontal field of view (including not less than ±88 measured degrees either side of the centre of the design eye point) and not less than a total of 36 measured degrees vertical field of view from the pilot’s and co-pilot’s eye points. b.2 The visual system shall meet all the standards enumerated as applicable to the level of qualification requested by the applicant. b.1 a.1 3 Visual System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD SOC is acceptable in place of this test. Consideration shall be given to optimising the vertical field of view for the respective aeroplane cut-off angle. SOC is acceptable in place of this test. For FTDs if the visual system is to be used for the training of manoeuvring by visual reference (such as route and airfield competence) then the visual system should at least comply with that required for level A FFS. For FTDs, FNPT 1s and BITDs, when visual systems have been added by the FSTD operator even though not attracting specific credits, they will be assessed to ensure that they do not adversely affect the qualification of the FSTD. COMPLIANCE 2033 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 A visual system (night/dusk or day) capable of providing a field-of-view of a minimum of 45 degrees horizontally and 30 degrees vertically, unless restricted by the type of aeroplane, simultaneously for each pilot, including adjustable cloud base and visibility. A means of recording the visual response time for visual systems. System Geometry. The system fitted shall be free from optical discontinuities and artefacts that create non-realistic cues. Visual textural cues to assess sink rate and depth perception during take-off and landing shall be provided. Horizon, and attitude shall correlate to the simulated attitude indicator. Occulting - A minimum of ten levels shall be available. Surface (Vernier) resolution shall occupy a visual angle of not greater than 2 arc minutes in the visual display used on a scene from the pilot’s eyepoint. c.1 d.1 e.1 f.1 g.1 h.1 A b.3 3 Visual System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS 1-C-26 B 1 2 I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Test and Statement of Compliance required containing calculations confirming resolution. Statement of Compliance required. Occulting shall be demonstrated. Statement of Compliance required. For Level ‘A’ FFS visual cueing shall be sufficient to support changes in approach path by using runway perspective. Test required. A Statement of Compliance is acceptable in place of this test. SOC is acceptable in place of this test. The visual system need not be collimated but shall be capable of meeting the standards laid down in Part 3 and 4 (Validation, Functions and Subjective Tests - See ACJ No.1 to JAR-FSTD A.030). COMPLIANCE JAR-FSTD A D FTD LEVEL Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) C FS LEVEL 2034 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 Surface contrast ratio shall be demonstrated by a raster drawn test pattern showing a contrast ratio of not less than 5:1 Highlight brightness shall be demonstrated using a raster drawn test pattern. The highlight brightness shall not 2 be less than 20 cd/m (6ft-lamberts). Light point size – not greater than 5 arc minutes. Light point contrast ratio – not less than 10:1 Light point contrast ratio – not less than 25:
2. Daylight, twilight and night visual capability as applicable for level of qualification sought. The visual system shall be capable of meeting, as a minimum, the system brightness and contrast ratio criteria as applicable for level of qualification sought j.1 k.1 l.1 l.2 m.1 m.2 A i.1 3 Visual System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS 1-C-27 D 1 2 I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD required for System objective and scene content tests are required. Statement of Compliance system capability. Test and Statement of compliance required. Test and Statement of compliance required. Test and Statement of Compliance required. This is equivalent to a light point resolution of 2.5 arc minutes. Test and Statement of Compliance required. Use of calligraphic lights to enhance raster brightness is acceptable. Test and Statement of Compliance required. COMPLIANCE SECTION 1 C FTD LEVEL Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) B FS LEVEL 2035 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD A 01.05.08 01.05.08 The system, when used in training, shall provide in daylight, full colour presentations and sufficient surfaces with appropriate textural cues to conduct a visual approach, landing and airport movement (taxi). Surface shading effects shall be consistent with simulated (static) sun position. m.4 C B Total scene content shall be comparable in detail to that produced by 10000 visible textured surfaces and (in day) 6000 visible lights or (in twilight or night) 15000 visible lights, and sufficient system capacity to display 16 simultaneously moving objects. A FS LEVEL m.3 3 Visual System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD COMPLIANCE 2036 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 1-C-28 The system, when used in training, shall provide at twilight, as a minimum, full colour presentations of reduced ambient intensity, sufficient surfaces with appropriate textural cues that include selfilluminated objects such as road networks, ramp lighting and airport signage, to conduct a visual approach, landing and airport movement (taxi). Scenes shall include a definable horizon and typical terrain characteristics such as fields, roads and bodies of water and surfaces illuminated by representative ownship lighting (e.g. landing lights). If provided, directional horizon lighting shall have correct orientation and be consistent with surface shading effects. The system, when used in training, shall provide at night, as a minimum, all features applicable to the twilight scene, as defined above, with the exception of the need to portray reduced ambient intensity that removes ground cues that are not self-illuminating or illuminated by ownship lights (e.g. landing lights). m.5 m.6 3 Visual System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FS LEVEL D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD COMPLIANCE 2037 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD A 1-C-29 01.05.08 01.05.08 Significant flight deck sounds which result from pilot actions corresponding to those of the aeroplane or class of aeroplane. Sound of precipitation, rain removal equipment and other significant aeroplane noises perceptible to the pilot during normal and abnormal operations and the sound of a crash when the FSTD is landed in excess of limitations. Comparable amplitude and frequency of flight deck noises, including engine and airframe sounds. The sounds shall be coordinated with the required weather. The volume control shall have an indication of sound level setting which meets all qualification requirements. a.1 b.1 c.1 d.1 4 Sound System FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING DEVICE STANDARDS A B C FFS LEVEL 1-C-30 D 1 2 FTD LEVEL I II MCC FNPT LEVEL BITD Tests required. Statement of Compliance required. For FNPT Level I and BITD engine sounds only need be available COMPLIANCE 2038 LUXEMBOURG Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD A.030 (continued) JAR-FSTD A SECTION 1 2039 LUXEMBOURG Annexe II Code JAR-FSTD (H) – Entraîneurs synthétiques de vol pour hélicoptèrers Joint Aviation Requirements JAR–FSTD H Helicopter Flight Simulation Training Devices Initial issue 01 May 2008 All rights reserved Printed and distributed by Global Engineering Documents, 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, Colorado 80112, U S A on behalf of the Joint Aviation Authorities Committee. 2040 LUXEMBOURG The members of the Joint Aviation Authorities Committee are representatives of the Civil Aviation Authorities of the countries that have signed the ‘Arrangements Concerning the Development and the Acceptance of Joint Aviation Requirements’. A list of these countries is kept by European Civil Aviation Conference, 3 bis Villa Emile Bergerat, 92522 NEUILLY SUR SEINE Cedex, France.* Further copies of the Joint Aviation Requirements can be purchased from IHS, Inc. , whose world-wide offices are listed on the JAA website (www.jaa.nl) and IHS website (www.global.ihs.com). For electronic versions of Joint Aviation Authorities Documents please refer to the website of IHS, Inc. on www.ihs.com, where you will find information on how to order. Enquiries regarding the contents should be addressed to the JAA, Saturnusstraat 40-44, PO Box 3000, 2130 KA HOOFDDORP, The Netherlands (publications@jaat.eu). *These countries are: Albania, Armenia, Austria, [Azerbaijan], Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, European Aviation Safety Agency, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, [Republic of Georgia], Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, & United Kingdom 01.05.08 ii 2041 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H CONTENTS (general layout) JAR–FSTD H HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES FOREWORD CHECK LIST OF PAGES PREAMBLE SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS SUBPART A — APPLICABILITY SUBPART B — GENERAL SUBPART C — HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES SECTION 2 – ADVISORY CIRCULARS JOINT (ACJ) ACJ B — GENERAL ACJ C — HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES C-1 01.05.08 2042 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 C-2 2043 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H CONTENTS (details) JAR–FSTD H HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES Paragraph Page SECTION 1 – REQUIREMENTS General and Presentation 1-0-1 SUBPART A – APPLICABILITY JAR–FSTD H.001 Applicability 1-A-1 Terminology 1-B-1 SUBPART B – GENERAL JAR–FSTD H.005 SUBPART C – HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES JAR–FSTD H.015 Application for FSTD Qualification 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD H.020 Validity FSTD Qualification 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD H.025 Rules governing FSTD Operators 1-C-1 JAR–FSTD H.030 Requirements for FSTDs qualified on or after 1 August 2008 1-C-2 JAR–FSTD H.031 Requirements for FFS qualified on or after 1 April 2001 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-2 JAR–FSTD H.032 Requirements for FTDs qualified on or after 1 January 2004 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD H.033 Requirements for FNPTs qualified on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD H.035 Requirements for FFSs approved or qualified before 1 April 2001 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD H.036 Requirements for FTDs approved or qualified before 1 January 2004 1-C-3 JAR–FSTD H.037 Requirements for FNPTs approved or qualified before 1 January 2003 1-C-4 JAR–FSTD H.040 Changes to qualified FSTDs 1-C-4 JAR–FSTD H.045 Interim FSTD Qualification 1-C-5 JAR–FSTD H.050 Transferability of FSTD Qualification 1-C-5 Appendix 1 to JAR–FSTD H.030 FSTD Standards 1-C-6 C-3 01.05.08 2044 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H Paragraph Page SECTION 2 – ADVISORY CIRCULARS JOINT (ACJ) General and Presentation 2-0-1 ACJ B – GENERAL ACJ FSTD H.005 Terminology, Abbreviations 2-B-1 ACJ C – HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.015 ACJ No. 2 to JAR-FSTD H.015 FSTD Qualification – Application and Inspection 2-C-1 FSTD Evaluations 2-C-7 ACJ to JAR-FSTD H.020 Validity of FSTD Qualification 2-C-10 ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.025 Quality System 2-C-10 ACJ No. 2 to Installations 2-C-16 ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 FSTDs qualified on or after 1 August 2008 2-C-17 Appendix 1 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Validation Test Tolerances 2-C-106 Appendix 2 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Validation Data Roadmap 2-C-108 Appendix 3 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Rotor Aerodynamic Modeling Techniques 2-C-110 Appendix 4 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Vibration Platforms for Helicopter FSTDs 2-C-112 Appendix 5 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Transport Delay Testing Method 2-C-114 Appendix 6 to ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Recurrent Evaluations – Validation Test Data Presentation 2-C-117 Appendix 7 to ACJ No 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Applicability 2-C-118 Appendix 8 to ACJ No 1 JAR–FSTD H.030 Visual Display Systems 2-C-119 Appendix 9 to ACJ No 1 JAR–FSTD H.030 General technical Requirements for FSTD Qualification Levels 2-C-122 ACJ No. 2 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Guidance on Design & Qualification of Level ‘A’ Helicopter FFS 2-C-127 ACJ No. 3 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Guidance on Design & Qualification of Helicopter FTDs 2-C-129 ACJ No. 4 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Use of Data for Helicopter FTDs 2-C-132 ACJ No. 5 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Guidance on Design & Qualification of Helicopter FNPTs 2-C-133 JAR-FSTD H.025 01.05.08 C-4 2045 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H Paragraph Page ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030(c)

(1)Engineering Simulator Validation Data 2-C-141 ACJ No. 2 to JAR-FSTD H.030(c)

(1)Engineering Simulator Validation Data – Approved Guidelines 2-C-142 ACJ to FSTD H.035 FFS Approved or Qualified before 1 April 2001 2-C-144 ACJ to FSTD H.037 FNPTs Approved or Qualified before 1 January 2003 2-C-145 ACJ to FSTD H.045 New Helicopter FFS/FTD Qualification 2-C-146 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C-5 01.05.08 2046 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 C-6 2047 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H FOREWORD 1 The Civil Aviation Authorities of certain European countries have agreed common comprehensive and detailed aviation requirements, referred to as Joint Aviation Requirements (JARs), with a view to minimising Type Certification problems on joint ventures, to facilitate the export and import of aviation products, to make it easier for maintenance carried out in one European country to be accepted by the Civil Aviation Authority in another European country and to regulate commercial air transport operations. 2 JARs are recognised by the Civil Aviation Authorities of participating countries as an acceptable basis for showing compliance with their national codes. 3 The content has been prepared using the expertise available in this field and added to where necessary by making use of existing European regulations and the Federal Aviation Requirements of the United States of America where acceptable. 4 JAR–FSTD H is issued with no National Variants. It may be felt that the document does not contain all of the detailed compliance and interpretative information which some Civil Aviation Authorities and Industry organisations would like to see. However, it is accepted that JAR–FSTD H should be applied in practice and the lessons learned embodied in future amendments. The Civil Aviation Authorities of the JAA are therefore committed to early amendment in the light of experience. 5 Future development of the requirements of JAR–FSTD H, including the commitment in Paragraph 4, will be in accordance with the JAA’s Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) procedures. These procedures allow for the amendment of JAR–FSTD H to be proposed by any organisation or person. 6 The Civil Aviation Authorities have agreed they should not unilaterally initiate amendment of their national codes without having made a proposal for amendment of JAR–FSTD H in accordance with the agreed procedure. 7 Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in JAR–FSTD H that are considered generally applicable are contained in JAR–1, Definitions and Abbreviations. However, definitions and abbreviations of terms used in JAR–FSTD H that are specific to a Subpart of JAR–FSTD H are normally given in the Subpart concerned or, exceptionally, in the associated compliance or interpretative material. 8 Amendments to the text in JAR–FSTD H are issued as Replacement Pages. These show an effective date and have the same status and applicability as JAR–FSTD H from that date. 9 New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent Amendment’ is issued. 10 Comment/Response documents developed following Notices of Proposed Amendment (NPA) consultation have been produced by the JAA and are published on the JAA Internet Site: www.jaa.nl. Readers can also apply to Central JAA for copies of specific Comment/Response Documents as required. F-1 01.05.08 2048 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 F-2 2049 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H JOINT AVIATION REQUIREMENTS CHECK LIST OF PAGES JAR-FSTD H - HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES Initial issue dated 01 May 2008 The following pages of JAR-FSTD H are now current: Page No Legend Date Title Page ii Initial issue Initial issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 F-1 F-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-1 CL-2 CL-3 CL-4 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 P-1 P-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-0-1 1-0-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-A-1 1-A-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-B-1 1-B-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 1-C-1 1-C-2 1-C-3 1-C-4 1-C-5 1-C-6 1-C-7 1-C-8 1-C-9 1-C-10 1-C-11 1-C-12 1-C-13 1-C-14 1-C-15 1-C-16 1-C-17 1-C-18 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-1 01.05.08 2050 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H Paragraph Legend Page 1-C-19 1-C-20 1-C-21 1-C-22 1-C-23 1-C-24 1-C-25 1-C-26 1-C-27 1-C-28 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-0-1 2-0-2 Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-B-1 2-B-2 2-B-3 2-B-4 2-B-5 2-B-6 2-B-7 2-B-8 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 2-C-1 2-C-2 2-C-3 2-C-4 2-C-5 2-C-6 2-C-7 2-C-8 2-C-9 2-C-10 2-C-11 2-C-12 2-C-13 2-C-14 2-C-15 2-C-16 2-C-17 2-C-18 2-C-19 2-C-20 2-C-21 2-C-22 2-C-23 2-C-24 2-C-25 2-C-26 2-C-27 2-C-28 2-C-29 2-C-30 2-C-31 2-C-32 2-C-33 2-C-34 2-C-35 2-C-36 2-C-37 2-C-38 2-C-39 2-C-40 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-2 2051 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H Paragraph Legend Page 2-C-41 2-C-42 2-C-43 2-C-44 2-C-45 2-C-46 2-C-47 2-C-48 2-C-49 2-C-50 2-C-51 2-C-52 2-C-53 2-C-54 2-C-55 2-C-56 2-C-57 2-C-58 2-C-59 2-C-60 2-C-61 2-C-62 2-C-63 2-C-64 2-C-65 2-C-66 2-C-67 2-C-68 2-C-69 2-C-70 2-C-71 2-C-72 2-C-73 2-C-74 2-C-75 2-C-76 2-C-77 2-C-78 2-C-79 2-C-80 2-C-81 2-C-82 2-C-83 2-C-84 2-C-85 2-C-86 2-C-87 2-C-88 2-C-89 2-C-90 2-C-91 2-C-92 2-C-93 2-C-94 2-C-95 2-C-96 2-C-97 2-C-98 2-C-99 2-C-100 2-C-101 2-C-102 2-C-103 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-3 01.05.08 2052 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H Paragraph Legend Page 2-C-104 2-C-105 2-C-106 2-C-107 2-C-108 2-C-109 2-C-110 2-C-111 2-C-112 2-C-113 2-C-114 2-C-115 2-C-116 2-C-117 2-C-118 2-C-119 2-C-120 2-C-121 2-C-122 2-C-123 2-C-124 2-C-125 2-C-126 2-C-127 2-C-128 2-C-129 2-C-130 2-C-131 2-C-132 2-C-133 2-C-134 2-C-135 2-C-136 2-C-137 2-C-138 2-C-139 2-C-140 2-C-141 2-C-142 2-C-143 2-C-144 2-C-145 2-C-146 2-C-147 2-C-148 Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue Initial Issue 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 01.05.08 CL-4 2053 LUXEMBOURG JAR- FSTD H PREAM BLE JAR–FSTD H Initial Issue JAR–FSTD H comprises 3 Subparts (A, B and C) in Section 1, and 2 Subparts (B and C) in Section 2. JAR-FSTD H is a simple amalgamation of JAR STD 1H, 2H and 3H into one document. Section 1 Subpart A Applicability to all Helicopter FSTD Subpart B Terminology for all Helicopter FSTD and implementation Subpart C Basic regulatory processes Table of Standards in Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 contains the standard for all devices Section 2 Subpart B Terminology and Abbreviations rationalised and harmonised with Helicopter STD standards documents. Subpart C Regulatory Processes combined. Table of Objective Tests (ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030) contains the testing requirements for all devices. Table of Functions and Subjective Tests (ACJ No. 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030) contains the testing requirements for all devices P-1 01.05.08 2054 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 P-2 2055 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 – REQUIREM ENTS 1 GENERAL 1.1 This Section contains the requirements for helicopter Flight Simulation Training Devices. 2 PRESENTATION 2.1 The requirements of JAR–FSTD H are presented in two columns on loose pages, each page being identified by the date of issue and the Amendment number under which it is amended or reissued. 2.2 Sub-headings are in italic typeface. 2.3 Explanatory Notes not forming part of the requirements appear in smaller typeface. 2.4 New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent ‘Amendment’ is issued. 2.5 After each paragraph, the various changes and amendments, if any since the initial issue, are indicated together with their date of issue. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-0-1 01.05.08 2056 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-0-2 2057 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H SUBPART A - APPLICABILITY JAR–FSTD H.001 Applicability JAR–FSTD H as amended applies to those persons, organisations or enterprises (Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTD) operators) seeking initial qualification of FSTDs. The version of JAR-FSTD H agreed by the Authority and used for issue of the initial qualification shall be applicable for future recurrent qualifications of the FSTD unless recategorised. FSTD users shall also gain approval to use the FSTD as part of their approved training programmes despite the fact that the FSTD has been previously qualified. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-A-1 01.05.08 2058 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-A-2 2059 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H SUBPART B – GENERAL JAR-FSTD H.005(f) (continued) JAR–FSTD H.005 Terminology (See ACJ to FSTD H.005) account of helicopter to FSTD differences and the operating and training ability of the organization. Because of the technical complexity of FSTD qualification, it is essential that standard terminology is used throughout. The following principal terms and abbreviations shall be used in order to comply with JAR–FSTD (H). Further terms and abbreviations are contained in ACJ to FSTD H.005. (g) Flight Simulation Training Device Operator (FSTD operator). That person, organisation or enterprise directly responsible to the Authority for requesting and maintaining the qualification of a particular FSTD. (h) Flight Simulation Training Device User (FSTD User). The person, organization or enterprise requesting training, checking and testing credits through the use of an FSTD. (a) Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD). A training device which is a Full Flight Simulator (FFS), a Flight Training Device (FTD), a Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT). (i) Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification (FSTD Qualification). The level of technical ability of an FSTD as defined in the compliance document. (b) Full Flight Simulator (FFS). A full size replica of a specific type or make, model and series helicopter flight deck, including the assemblage of all equipment and computer programmes necessary to represent the helicopter in ground and flight operations, a visual system providing an out of the flight deck view, and a force cueing motion system. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for FFS Qualification. (j) Qualification Test Guide (QTG). A document designed to demonstrate that the performance and handling qualities of an FSTD agree within prescribed limits with those of the helicopter and that all applicable regulatory requirements have been met. The QTG includes both the helicopter and FSTD data used to support the validation. (c) Flight Training Device (FTD). A full size replica of a specific helicopter type’s instruments, equipment, panels and controls in an open flight deck area or an enclosed helicopter flight deck, including the assemblage of equipment and computer software programmes necessary to represent the helicopter in ground and flight conditions to the extent of the systems installed in the device. It does not require a force cueing motion or visual system. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for a specific FTD Level of Qualification. (d) Flight and Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT). A training device which represents the flight deck or cockpit environment including the assemblage of equipment and computer programmes necessary to represent a helicopter in flight operations to the extent that the systems appear to function as in a helicopter. It is in compliance with the minimum standards for a specific FNPT Level of Qualification. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (e) Other Training Device (OTD). A training aid other than FFS, FTD or FNPT which provides for training where a complete flight deck environment is not necessary. (f) Flight Simulation Training Device User Approval (FSTD User Approval). The extent to which an FSTD of a specified Qualification Level may be used by persons, organisations or enterprises as approved by the Authority. It takes 1-B-1 01.05.08 2060 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 01.05.08 1-B-2 2061 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H SUBPART C – HELICOPTER FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES JAR-FSTD H.025(a) (continued) JAR–FSTD H.015 Application for FSTD Qualification (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD H.015) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD H.015) FSTDs. Compliance monitoring shall include a feedback system to the Accountable Manager to ensure corrective action as necessary.

(2)The Quality System shall include a Quality Assurance Programme that contains procedures designed to verify that the specified performance, functions and characteristics are being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements, standards and procedures. (a) The FSTD operator requiring evaluation of a FFS, FTD, or FNPT shall apply to the Authority giving 3 months notice. In exceptional cases this period may be reduced to one month at the discretion of the Authority.

(3)The Quality System and the Quality Manager shall be acceptable to the Authority. (b) An FSTD Qualification Certificate will be issued following satisfactory completion of an evaluation of the FFS, FTD or FNPT by the Authority. JAR–FSTD H.020

(4)The Quality System shall described in relevant documentation. (b) Updating. A link shall be maintained between the operator’s organization, the Authority and the relevant manufacturers to incorporate important modifications, especially: Validity of FSTD Qualification (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD H.020)

(1)Helicopter modifications which are essential for training and checking shall be introduced into all affected FSTDs whether or not enforced by an airworthiness directive. (a) A FSTD qualification is valid for 12 months unless otherwise specified by the Authority.

(2)Modification of FSTDs, including motion and visual systems (where applicable): (

1. b)A FSTD qualification revalidation can take place at any time within the 60 days prior to the expiry of the validity of the qualification document. The new period of validity shall continue from the expiry date of the previous qualification document. (
2. i)When essential for training and checking, FSTD operators shall update their FSTDs (for example in the light of data revisions). Modifications of the FSTD hardware and software which affect handling, performance and systems operation or any major modifications of the motion or visual system shall be evaluated to determine the impact on the original qualification criteria. FSTD operators shall prepare amendments for any affected validation tests. The FSTD operator shall test the FSTD to the new criteria. (
3. c)The Authority shall refuse, revoke, suspend or vary a FSTD qualification, if the provisions of JAR–FSTD H are not satisfied. JAR–FSTD H.025 Rules Governing FSTD Operators (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD H.025) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD H.025) (
4. ii)The Authority shall be advised in advance of any major changes to determine if the tests carried out by the FSTD operator are satisfactory. A special evaluation of the FSTD may be necessary prior to returning it to training following the modification. The FSTD operator shall demonstrate his capability to maintain the performance, functions and other characteristics specified for the FSTD Qualification Level as follows: (
5. a)be Quality System

(1)A Quality System shall be established and a Quality Manager designated to monitor compliance with, and the adequacy of, procedures required to ensure the maintenance of the Qualification Level of (

1. c)Installations. Ensure that the FSTD is housed in a suitable environment which supports safe and reliable operation. 1-C-1 01.05.08 2062 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H.025(
2. c)(continued) JAR-FSTD H.030(
3. c)(continued)

(1)The FSTD operator shall ensure that the FSTD and its installation comply with the local regulations for health and safety. (

1. d)Data shall be of a standard that satisfies the Authority before the FSTD can gain a Qualification Level. However, as a minimum all FSTD occupants and maintenance personnel shall be briefed on FSTD safety to ensure that they are aware of all safety equipment and procedures in the FSTD in case of emergency. (
2. e)The FSTD operator shall submit a QTG in a form and manner which is acceptable to the Authority. (
3. f)The QTG will only be approved after completion of an initial or upgrade evaluation, and when all the discrepancies in the QTG have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Authority. After inclusion of the results of the tests witnessed by the Authority, the approved QTG becomes the Master QTG (MQTG), which is the basis for the FSTD qualification and subsequent recurrent FSTD evaluations

(2)The FSTD safety features such as emergency stops and emergency lighting shall be checked at least annually and recorded by the FSTD operator. (d) Additional Equipment. Where additional equipment has been added to the FSTD even though not required for qualification, it will be assessed to ensure that it does not adversely affect the quality of training. Therefore any subsequent modification, removal or unserviceability of such equipment could affect the qualification of the device. (g)

(2)Establish a Configuration Control System to ensure the continued integrity of the hardware and software of the qualified FSTD. JAR-FSTD H.031 Requirements for FFS qualified on or after 1 April 2001 and before 1 August 2008 Any FFS submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 April 2001 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD H with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This re-evaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 1H, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JAR-FSTD H. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD H. (

1. a)Any FSTD submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 August 2008 will be evaluated against applicable JAR-FSTD H criteria for the Qualifications levels for which qualification has been applied. Recurrent evaluations of a FSTD will be based on the same version of JARFSTD H that was applicable for its initial evaluation. An upgrade will be based upon the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD H. (
2. b)A FSTD shall be assessed in those areas which are essential to completing the flight crew member training, testing and checking process as applicable. The FSTD shall be subjected to:

(1)01.05.08 The FSTD operator shall:

(1)Run the complete set of tests contained within the MQTG progressively between each annual evaluation by the Authority. Results shall be dated and retained in order to satisfy both the FSTD operator and the Authority that FSTD standards are being maintained; and JAR–FSTD H.030 Requirements for FSTD qualified on or after 1 August 2008 (See Appendix 1 to JAR– FSTD H.030) (See ACJ No. 1 to JARFSTD H.030) (See ACJ No. 2 to JARFSTD H.030) (See ACJ No. 3 to JARFSTD H.030) (See ACJ No. 4 to JARFSTD H.030) (See ACJ No. 5 to JARFSTD H.030) (

1. c)Functions & subjective tests Validation tests and 1-C-2 2063 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H JAR-FSTD H.035(
2. a)(continued) JAR-FSTD H.032 Requirements for Flight Training Devices (FTD) qualified on or after 1 January 2004 and before 1 August 2008 circumstances exceed National credits. originally issued (
3. b)FFS’s neither recategorised nor with an approval maintained under the Grandfather Rights provision, will be qualified in accordance with JAR–FSTD H.030. Any FTD submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 January 2004 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD H with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This reevaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 2H, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JAR-FSTD H. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD H. (
4. c)FFS that are not recategorised but that have a primary reference document used for their testing may be qualified by the Authority to an equivalent JAR–FSTD H Qualification Level, either AG, BG, CG or DG. An upgrade requires the recategorisation of the FFS.

(1)To gain and maintain an equivalent Qualification Level, these FFS shall be assessed in those areas which are essential to completing the flight crew member training and checking process, as applicable.

(2)JAR-FSTD H.033 Requirements for Flight & Navigation Procedures Trainers (FNPT) qualified on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008 tests. The FFS shall be subjected to: (

1. i)Validation tests; and (
2. ii)Functions and subjective (
3. d)FFS that are not recategorised and that do not have a primary reference document used for their testing, shall be qualified by special arrangement. Such FFS will be issued with a Special Category and shall be subjected to functions and subjective tests corresponding to those detailed within this document. In addition any previously recognised validation test shall be used. Any FNPT submitted for initial evaluation on or after 1 January 2003 and before 1 August 2008, shall automatically be granted an equivalent qualification under JAR-FSTD H with effect from the re-evaluation conducted at the end of the current validity period. This reevaluation, and all future re-evaluations, will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the same version of JAR-STD 3H, which was applicable for its last evaluation prior to implementation of JAR-FSTD H. Any upgrade will be based on the currently applicable version of JAR-FSTD H. JAR–FSTD H.036 Requirements for Flight Training Devices approved or qualified before 1 January 2004 No longer applicable. JAR–FSTD H.035 Requirements for Full Flight Simulators approved or qualified before 1 April 2001 (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD H.035) (
4. a)FFS approved or qualified in accordance with national regulations of JAA Member States before 1 April 2001 will either be recategorised or will continue to maintain their approval under the Grandfather Rights provision, in accordance with sub-paragraphs (
5. c)and (
6. d)below. For FFS which are not recategorized, maximum credit shall under no INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-C-3 01.05.08 2064 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H.040(
7. a)(continued)

(1)Helicopter modifications which could affect FSTD qualification.

(2)FSTD hardware and or software modifications which could affect the handling qualities, performance or system representations. JAR–FSTD H.037 Requirements for Flight Navigation Procedures Trainers approved or qualified before 1 January 2003 (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD H.037) (

1. a)FNPTs or devices approved or qualified in accordance with national regulations of JAA Members States before 1 January 2003 will either be recategorised or will continue to maintain their approval under the Grandfather Rights provision, in accordance with sub-paragraphs (
2. c)and (
3. d)below. Grandfather Rights shall cease to exist on the 1st January 2009. For FNPT which are not recategorised maximum credits shall under no circumstances exceed originally issued National credits.

(2)In the case of a FSTD upgrade, an FSTD operator shall run all validation tests for the requested Qualification Level. Results from previous evaluations shall not be used to validate FSTD performance for the current upgrade. tests. The devices shall be subjected Validation tests and (ii) Functions and (c) to subjective

(2)Prior to returning the FSTD to service at the new location the FSTD operator shall perform at least one third of the validation tests and all functions and subjective tests to ensure that the FSTD performance meets its original qualification standard. A copy of the test documentation shall be retained together with the FSTD records for review by the Authority.

(3)An evaluation of the FSTD in accordance with its original JAA qualification criteria shall be at the discretion of the Authority. qualified (a) Requirement to notify major changes to a FSTD. The operator of a qualified FSTD shall inform the Authority of proposed major changes such as: 01.05.08 Relocation of a FSTD

(1)In instances where a FSTD is moved to a new location, the Authority shall be advised before the planned activity along with a schedule of related events. (d) FNPTs that are not recategorised and that do not have a primary reference document used for their testing shall be qualified by special arrangement. Such FNPTs will be issued with a Special Category and shall be subjected to Functions and Subjective Tests corresponding to those detailed within this document. In addition any previously recognized Validation tests shall be used. JAR–FSTD H.040 Changes FSTD Any deactivation of the FSTD.

(1)If an upgrade is proposed the FSTD operator shall seek the advice of the Authority and give full details of the modifications. If the upgrade evaluation does not fall upon the anniversary of the original qualification date, a special evaluation is required to permit the FSTD to continue to qualify even at the previous Qualification Level.

(1)To gain and maintain their equivalent qualification level, these FNPTs shall be assessed in those areas which are essential to completing the flight crew member training process, as applicable. (i)

(4)(

1. b)Upgrade of a FSTD. A FSTD may be upgraded to a higher Qualification Level. Special evaluation is required before the award of a higher Level of Qualification. (
2. c)FNPTs that are not recategorised, but that have a primary reference document used for their testing, may continue under previous authorisation, provided that they continue to comply with the primary reference document.

(2)Relocation of the FSTD; and The Authority may complete a special evaluation following major changes or when a FSTD appears not to be performing at its initial Qualification Level. (b) Recategorised FNPTs will be qualified in accordance with JAR-FSTD H.030. to:

(3)(

1. d)FSTD 1-C-4 Deactivation of a currently qualified 2065 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 JAR-FSTD H JAR-FSTD H.040(
2. d)(continued)

(1)If a FSTD operator plans to remove a FSTD from active status for prolonged periods, the Authority shall be notified and suitable controls established for the period during which the FSTD is inactive.

(2)The FSTD operator shall agree a procedure with the Authority to ensure that the FSTD can be restored to active status at its original Qualification Level. JAR–FSTD H.045 Interim FSTD Qualification (See ACJ to JAR-FSTD H.045) (

1. a)In the case of new helicopter programmes, special arrangements shall be made to enable an interim Qualification Level to be achieved. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK (
2. b)For Full Flight Simulators, an interim Qualification Level will only be granted at levels A, B or C (
3. c)Requirements, details relating to the issue, and the period of validity of an interim Qualification Level will be decided by the Authority. JAR–FSTD H.050 Transferability Qualification of FSTD When there is a change of FSTD operator: (
4. a)The new FSTD operator shall advise the Authority in advance in order to agree upon a plan of transfer of the FSTD. (
5. b)At the discretion of the Authority, the FSTD shall be subject to an evaluation in accordance with its original JAA qualification criteria. (
6. c)Provided that the FSTD performs to its original standard, its original Qualification Level shall be restored. Revised user approval(
7. s)may also be required. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-C-5 01.05.08 2066 LUXEMBOURG JAR-FSTD H SECTION 1 Appendix 1 to JAR-FSTD H.030 Flight Simulation Training Device Standards General This appendix describes the minimum Full Flight Simulator (FFS), Flight Training Device (FTD) and Flight Navigation Procedures Trainer (FNPT) requirements for qualifying devices to the required Qualification Levels. Certain requirements included in this section shall be supported with a statement of compliance (SOC) and, in some designated cases, an objective test. The SOC will describe how the requirement was met. The test results shall show that the requirement has been attained. In the following tabular listing of FSTD standards, statements of compliance are indicated in the compliance column. For FNPT use in Multi-Crew Co-operation (MCC) training the general technical requirement are expressed in the MCC column with additional systems, instrumentation and indicators as required for MCC training and operation. For MCC (Multi Crew Co-operation) minimum technical requirements are as for Level II or III, with the following additions or amendments: 1 Multi engine and multi pilot helicopter 2 Performance reserves, in case of an engine failure, to be in accordance with CAT. A criteria. 3 Anti icing or de-icing systems 4 Fire detection / suppression system 5 Dual controls 6 Autopilot with upper modes 7 2 VHF transceivers 8 2 VHF NAV receivers (VOR, ILS, DME) 9 1 ADF receiver 10 1 Marker receiver 11 1 transponder 12 Weather radar The following indicators shall be located in the same positions on the instrument panels of both pilots: 1 Airspeed 2 Flight attitude 3 Altimeter and radio altimeter 4 HSI 5 Vertical speed 6 ADF 7 VOR, ILS, DME 8 Marker indication 9 Stop watch 01.05.08 1-C-6 b.1 a.2 a.1 1-C-7 Functional controls, switches, instruments and primary and secondary flight controls sufficient for the training events to be accomplished, shall be located in a spatially correct area of the flight deck. Full size panels with functional controls, switches, instruments and primary and secondary flight controls, which shall be operating in the correct direction and with the correct range of movement. A flight deck, including the instructor’s station that is sufficiently closed off to exclude distractions. The flight deck, including the instructor’s station is fully enclosed. A flight deck that replicates the helicopter. A flight deck that is a full-scale replica of the helicopter simulated. Additional required crewmember duty stations and those required bulkheads aft of the pilot seats are also considered part of the cockpit and shall replicate the helicopter. 1.1 General FSTD STANDARDS B A C D 1 2 FTD LEVEL FFS LEVEL 3 I FNPT II III LEVEL MCC The use of electronically displayed images with physical overlay incorporating operable switches, knobs and buttons is acceptable. The use of electronically displayed images with physical overlay incorporating operable switches, knobs and buttons may be acceptable. This option is not acceptable for analogue instruments in FFS. For FTD Level 1 as appropriate for the replicated system COMPLIANCE 2067 LUXEMBOURG SECTION 1 J