Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.855 Rīgā 2007.gada 11.decembrī (prot. Nr.69 41.§) Par Starptautiskās telekomunikāciju savienības Reģionālo nolīgumu par zemes ciparu apraides dienesta plānošanu 1.reģion

iģinālu, ņemot vērā visas izmaiņas, papildinājumus un svītrojumus, kas izdarīti saskaņā ar šajā pantā paredzēto procedūru.4.2. Citu primāro zemes dienestu piešķīrumu koordinēšana ar apraides dienestu4.2.1. Ja administrācija grib izmainīt citu primāro zemes dienestu esošo piešķīrumu tehniskos parametrus vai ieviest jaunu citu primāro zemes dienestu piešķīrumu, jāizmanto šajā pantā paredzētā procedūra pirms jebkādas notifikācijas saskaņā ar 5. panta noteikumiem.4.2.2. Koordinēšanas procedūras uzsākšana4.2.2.1. Izmantojot 4.2.1. punktu, administrācija prasa piekrišanu jebkurai citai administrācijai, kuras apraides dienestu uzskata par ietekmētu.4.2.2.2. Administrācijas apraides dienestu uzskata par ietekmētu, ja ir pārsniegti 4. pielikuma I daļā noteiktie robežlielumi.4.2.2.3. Vienošanās, kas minēta 4.2.2.1. punktā, nav vajadzīga, ja:

1. a)neviens no attiecīgajiem robežlielumiem, kas norādīti 4. pielikuma I daļā, kā tas minēts 4.2.2.2. punktā, nav pārsniegts vaib) ierosinātās izmaiņas attiecas uz izmaiņām tehniskajos parametros, kas nepalielina esošo traucējumu līmeni un nepaaugstina esošo vajadzīgās aizsardzības līmeni.4.2.2.4. Administrācija, kas ierosina jaunu vai izmainītu piešķīrumu, elektroniski paziņo birojam attiecīgos 3. pielikumā uzskaitītos tehniskos parametrus, un pēc vajadzības norāda arī visu to administrāciju nosaukumus, kas ir jau piekritušas ierosinātajam jaunajam vai izmainītajam piešķīrumam, pamatojoties uz tehniskajiem parametriem, kuri paziņoti birojam.Birojam šis paziņojums jāuzskata, ja to pieprasa, arī kā pieprasījums piemērot 4.2.5.3. punktā paredzēto procedūru, ja:nav vajadzīga neviena piekrišana saskaņā ar 4.2.2.3. punktu, un nevienas administrācijas nosaukums nav iekļauts saskaņā ar 4.2.3.2. punktu vaivisas piekrišanas ir saņemtas, un saskaņā ar 4.2.2.7. punktu nevienas administrācijas nosaukums nav svītrots vai iekļauts tajā saskaņā ar 4.2.3.2. punktu.4.2.2.5. Ja saskaņā ar 4.2.2.4. punktu iesniegtie tehniskie parametri nav pilnīgi, birojs nekavējoties pieprasa, lai šī administrācija iesniedz vajadzīgos paskaidrojumus un informāciju.4.2.2.6. Saņemot attiecīgi 4.2.2.4. punktā vai 4.2.2.5. punktā norādīto pilnīgu informāciju, birojs 40 dienās:
2. a)noteic, kuras administrācijas ir uzskatāmas par ietekmētām saskaņā ar 4.2.2.2. punktu;
3. b)saņemtos tehniskos parametrus, kā arī noteikto administrāciju nosaukumus publicē BR IFIC īpašajā sekcijā, norādot to administrāciju nosaukumus, par kuru piekrišanu saskaņā ar 4.2.2.4. punktu ir paziņojusi administrācija, kas prasa piekrišanu;
4. c)attiecīgi informē
5. a)apakšpunktā minētās administrācijas.4.2.2.7. Administrācija, kuras vienošanās ir paziņota birojam saskaņā ar 4.2.2.4. punktu, 40 dienās pēc 4.2.2.6. punkta
6. b)apakšpunktā minētās BR IFIC publicēšanas var pieprasīt birojam svītrot tās nosaukumu no to administrāciju saraksta, kuras ir devušas savu piekrišanu, kā publicēts atbilstoši 4.2.2.6. punkta
7. b)apakšpunktam. Minētā pieprasījuma eksemplāru birojs nosūta attiecīgai administrācijai, kas prasa piekrišanu. Ja administrācijas nosaukumu svītro no to administrāciju saraksta, kuras devušas savu piekrišanu, kā publicēts atbilstoši 4.2.2.6. punkta
8. b)apakšpunktam, birojs uzskata, ka ar šo administrāciju nav panākta vienošanās.4.2.3. Pieprasījums iekļaut piekrišanas prasīšanas procesā4.2.3.1. Jebkura administrācija, kas uzskata, ka tai jābūt iekļautai to administrāciju sarakstā, kuras uzskata par ietekmētām, 40 dienās pēc BR IFIC publicēšanas, pamatojot pieprasījumu ar 4. pielikuma I daļā minētajiem kritērijiem, var pieprasīt birojam, lai tās nosaukumu iekļauj to administrāciju sarakstā, kuras uzskata par ietekmētām.4.2.3.2. Saņemot šo pieprasījumu, birojs izskata attiecīgo jautājumu un, ja saskaņā ar 4.2.2.2. punktu tas secina, ka administrācijas nosaukumam jābūt iekļautam to administrāciju sarakstā, kuras tiek uzskatītas par ietekmētām, birojs:nekavējoties informē administrāciju, kas prasa piekrišanu, un administrāciju, kura pieprasa savu nosaukumu iekļaut to administrāciju sarakstā, kuras tiek uzskatītas par ietekmētām, un30 dienās pēc pieprasījuma saņemšanas publicē administrācijas nosaukumu 4.2.2.6. punkta
9. b)apakšpunktā minētās BR IFIC īpašās sekcijas papildinājumā.Administrācijai, kuras nosaukums ir publicēts papildinājumā, 4.2.4.6., 4.2.4.7., 4.2.4.8., 4.2.4.9. un 4.2.5.1. punktā norādīto attiecīgo 75 dienu periodu rēķina no minētā BR IFIC īpašās sekcijas papildinājuma publicēšanas datuma.Ja birojs konstatē, ka administrācijas nosaukums nav jāiekļauj to administrāciju sarakstā, kuras tiek uzskatītas par ietekmētām, tas informē šo administrāciju.4.2.3.3. Administrācija, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, izmanto turpmākajā 4.2.4. punktā paredzēto procedūru, prasot piekrišanu tām administrācijām, ar kurām tā vēl nav panākusi vienošanos (sk. arī 4.2.2.7. punktu) un kuras ir uzskaitītas attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
10. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā minētajā publikācijā.4.2.3.4. Ja visas piekrišanas ir saņemtas un saskaņā ar 4.2.2.7. punktu nav svītrots nevienas administrācijas nosaukums, un nav iekļauts nevienas administrācijas nosaukums saskaņā ar 4.2.3.2. punktu, izmanto 4.2.5.3. punktā paredzēto procedūru.4.2.4. Piekrišanas prasīšana administrācijām, kuras uzskata par ietekmētām un kuru piekrišana vēl ir jāsaņem4.2.4.1. Attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
11. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā minētā BR IFIC īpašā sekcija ir oficiāls koordinācijas pieprasījums attiecībā uz tām administrācijām, kuru piekrišana vēl jāsaņem.4.2.4.2. Prasot piekrišanu no citas administrācijas, administrācija, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, var darīt zināmu arī jebkuru papildu informāciju, kura attiecas uz izmantošanai ierosinātajiem kritērijiem, kā arī citu sīkāku informāciju par topogrāfiskajiem datiem, konkrētiem izplatīšanās apstākļiem u.c.4.2.4.3. Saņemot attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
12. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā minēto BR IFIC īpašo sekciju, jebkura administrācija, kas tajā ir minēta, pārbauda ierosinātā jaunā vai izmainītā piešķīruma ietekmi uz savu apraides dienestu, cik iespējams, ņemot vērā 4.2.4.2. punktā norādīto papildu informāciju.4.2.4.4. Administrācija, no kuras prasa piekrišanu, var prasīt birojam palīdzību turpmākas informācijas nodrošināšanā, kas vajadzīga, lai administrācija, izmantojot 4. pielikuma I daļā izklāstīto metodi, var novērtēt traucējumus, ko izraisa ierosinātais jaunais vai izmainītais piešķīrums. Birojam šāda informācija jānosūta, izmantojot ātrāko sakaru līdzekli.4.2.4.5. Administrācija, no kuras prasa piekrišanu, var nosūtīt savu atzinumu administrācijai, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, vai nu tieši, vai, izmantojot biroja starpniecību. Jebkurā gadījumā birojs par šiem atzinumiem jāinformē.4.2.4.6. Administrācija, kas nepiekrīt ierosinātajam jaunajam vai izmainītajam piešķīrumam, 75 dienās pēc attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
13. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā norādītās BR IFIC publikācijas paziņo savu lēmumu, pamatojot to ar argumentiem, kuri attiecas uz tās apraides dienestu.4.2.4.7. Piecdesmit dienas pēc attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
14. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā minētās BR IFIC publicēšanas birojs pieprasa jebkurai administrācijai, kas vēl nav paziņojusi savu lēmumu par šo jautājumu. Pēc attiecīgā 75 dienu perioda, rēķinot no BR IFIC publicēšanas datuma, birojs nekavējoties informē administrāciju, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, par to, ka tas ir izsūtījis iepriekšminētos pieprasījumus, un paziņo tai to administrāciju nosaukumus, kuras ir devušas savu piekrišanu, un to administrāciju nosaukumus, kas nav atbildējušas.4.2.4.8. Ja administrācija nav atbildējusi 75 dienu periodā, uzskata, ka šī administrācija nav piekritusi ierosinātajam jaunajam vai izmainītajam piešķīrumam, ja vien netiek izmantoti 4.2.4.9. punkta un 4.2.4.10. punkta noteikumi.4.2.4.9. Pēc minētā 75 dienu perioda administrācija, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, var pieprasīt birojam palīdzību nosūtīt atgādinājumu administrācijai, kura nav atbildējusi, un pieprasīt attiecīgās administrācijas lēmumu. Šis pieprasījums nekādā ziņā nepagarina 4.2.5.1. punktā minēto 24 mēnešu periodu.4.2.4.10. Ja lēmums birojam nav paziņots 40 dienās pēc tam, kad saskaņā ar 4.2.4.9. punktu ir nosūtīts atgādinājums, tiek uzskatīts, ka administrācija, kas nav paziņojusi par lēmumu, ir piekritusi ierosinātajam jaunajam vai izmainītajam piešķīrumam.4.2.4.11. Ja 4.2.4.8. punktā vai 4.2.4.10. punktā minēto periodu beigās joprojām nav panākta vienošanās, birojs veic jebkādu izpēti, ko var pieprasīt gan administrācija, kura ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, gan administrācijas, no kurām prasa piekrišanu; 40 dienās tas informē administrācijas par izpētes rezultātiem un ieteic iespējamos problēmas risinājumus.4.2.4.12. Pirms 4.2. punktā paredzēto procedūru izmantošanas vai, izmantojot šajā punktā izklāstīto procedūru, jebkurā tās posmā administrācija var pieprasīt birojam palīdzību, kas nekādi neietekmē minēto periodu ievērošanu.4.2.4.13. Ja, prasot piekrišanu, administrācija veic izmaiņas savā sākotnējā priekšlikumā, tai atkārtoti jāizmanto 4.2. punkta noteikumi.4.2.5. Koordinēšanas procedūras pabeigšana4.2.5.1. Kad administrācija ir panākusi vienošanos ar visām administrācijām, kuru nosaukumi publicēti attiecīgi 4.2.2.6. punkta
15. b)apakšpunktā vai 4.2.3.2. punktā norādītajā BR IFIC, tā informē biroju par galīgi saskaņotajiem piešķīruma tehniskajiem parametriem, kā arī par to administrāciju nosaukumiem, ar kurām ir panākta vienošanās. Ja administrācija, kas ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, 24 mēnešos pēc 4.2.4.6. - 4.2.4.9. punktā noteiktā 75 dienu perioda neinformē biroju, ierosinātās izmaiņas zaudē spēku.4.2.5.2. Ja minēto galīgi saskaņoto tehnisko parametru dēļ savukārt tiek noteiktas citas ietekmētās administrācijas, tad administrācija, kura ierosina jauno vai izmainīto piešķīrumu, attiecībā pret šādām jaunajām administrācijām atkārtoti izmanto 4.2. punkta noteikumus.4.2.5.3. Pēc 4.2.5.1. punktā minētās pilnīgās informācijas saņemšanas birojs 30 dienās BR IFIC īpašajā sekcijā publicē piešķīruma tehniskos parametrus, kā arī to administrāciju nosaukumus, kuras ir piekritušas ierosinātajam jaunajam vai izmainītajam piešķīrumam, un attiecīgi iekļauj jauno vai grozīto piešķīrumu Sarakstā.4.2.5.4. Ierosinātais jaunais vai izmainītais piešķīrums zaudē spēku, ja 12 mēnešos pēc 4.2.5.3. punktā minētās publicēšanas tas nav notificēts saskaņā ar 5. pantu.4.2.5.5. Saskaņā ar šo pantu ietekmētās(-
16. o)administrācijas(-
17. u)piekrišanu var saņemt arī uz konkrētu laika periodu. Minētā laika perioda beigās birojs piešķīrumu svītro no Saraksta un/vai attiecīgi no MIFR, iepriekš informējot administrāciju.4.2.6. Saraksta aktualizēšanaBirojs uztur un periodiski publicē aktualizētu Saraksta

iģinālu, ņemot vērā visas izmaiņas, pievienojumus un svītrojumus, kas izdarīti saskaņā ar šajā pantā paredzēto procedūru.5. PANTSFrekvences piešķīrumu notifikācija5.1. Apraides staciju frekvences piešķīrumu notifikācija5.1.1. Ja administrācija grib uzsākt apraides stacijas piešķīruma izmantošanu, tā saskaņā ar Radionoteikumu 11. pantu notificē birojam minētā piešķīruma tehniskos parametrus, kas norādīti Nolīguma 3. pielikumā.5.1.2. Piešķīruma pārbaudē, ko birojs veic atbilstoši Radionoteikumu 11.34. punktam, t.i., tā pārbaudē par atbilstību Plāniem un ar tiem saistītajiem noteikumiem, secinājums ir labvēlīgs, ja:

1. a)piešķīrums ir Plānos6, un tam nav nevienas piezīmes attiecībā uz piešķīrumiem analogajā Plānā, uz citu primāro zemes dienestu esošajiem piešķīrumiem vai uz ierakstiem ciparu Plānā, un ir izpildīti 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi vaib) piešķīrums ir ciparu Plānā, un tam ir piezīme attiecībā uz:piešķīrumiem analogajā Plānā vai uz citu primāro zemes dienestu esošajiem piešķīrumiem, un visas vajadzīgās piekrišanas ir saņemtas, kā arī ir izpildīti 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi, un/vaiierakstiem ciparu Plānā, un notificējošā administrācija deklarē, ka visi ar piezīmi saistītie nosacījumi pilnībā ir izpildīti, kā arī ir izpildīti 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi, vai, ja:
2. c)piešķīrums izriet no iedalījuma ciparu Plānā, kuram nav nevienas piezīmes attiecībā uz piešķīrumiem analogajā Plānā, uz citu primāro zemes dienestu esošajiem piešķīrumiem, vai uz ierakstiem ciparu Plānā, 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi ir izpildīti, vai,
3. d)piešķīrums izriet no iedalījuma ciparu Plānā, kuram ir piezīme attiecībā uz:piešķīrumiem analogajā Plānā vai uz citu primāro zemes dienestu esošajiem piešķīrumiem, visas vajadzīgās vienošanās ir panāktas, kā arī ir izpildīti 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi, un/vaiierakstiem ciparu Plānā, 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi ir izpildīti un notificējošā administrācija deklarē, ka visi ar piezīmi saistītie nosacījumi ir pilnībā izpildīti, vai, jae) ierakstu ciparu Plānā izmanto ar atšķirīgiem tehniskajiem parametriem DVB-T vai T-DAB sistēmā, 4. pielikuma II daļas nosacījumi ir izpildīti.5.1.3. Raidījumiem apraides dienestā vai citos primārajos zemes dienestos, kas notiek atbilstīgi Radionoteikumiem, ciparu ierakstu Plānā var notificēt arī ar tādiem tehniskajiem parametriem, kas atšķiras no Plānā minētajiem parametriem, ja vien iepriekšminēto notificēto piešķīrumu galotnes jaudas blīvums jebkuros 4 kHz nepārsniedz ciparu ieraksta Plānā spektrālo jaudas blīvumu tajos pašos 4 kHz. Šādam lietojumam nevar prasīt lielāku aizsardzību kā tā, kāda pienākas iepriekšminētajam ciparu ierakstam.5.1.4. Ja attiecīgi 5.1.2. punktā un 5.1.3. punktā minētās pārbaudes secinājums ir labvēlīgs, piešķīrums jāieraksta MIFR. Savstarpējās attiecībās starp Līgumslēdzējām pusēm tiek uzskatīts, ka visiem apraides frekvences piešķīrumiem, kas ierakstīti MIFR un ir atbilstoši Nolīgumam, ir vienāds statuss neatkarīgi no datuma, kurā birojs ir saņēmis paziņojumus par šādiem frekvences piešķīrumiem, vai no datuma, kad uzsākta to ekspluatācija.5.1.5. Ja attiecīgi 5.1.2. punktā vai 5.1.3. punktā minētās pārbaudes secinājums ir nelabvēlīgs, paziņojums jānosūta atpakaļ notificējošai administrācijai, pamatojot atpakaļnosūtīšanas iemeslus.5.1.6. Ja administrācija paziņojumu iesniedz atkārtoti un, to atkārtoti izskatot birojā attiecīgi saskaņā ar 5.1.2. punktu un 5.1.3. punktu, pārbaudes secinājums ir labvēlīgs, piešķīrums jāieraksta MIFR.5.1.7. Ja, atkārtoti izskatot saskaņā ar 5.1.2. punktu, secinājums ir nelabvēlīgs, piešķīrums jāieraksta ar labvēlīgu secinājumu atbilstoši Radionoteikumu 11.31. punktam un ar nelabvēlīgu secinājumu atbilstoši Radionoteikumu 11.34. punktam, kā arī ar tās(-
4. o)administrācijas(-
5. u)nosaukumu(-iem), ar kurām joprojām nav panākta vienošanās, norādot, ka attiecībā uz šo(-īm) administrāciju(-ām) ierakstītais piešķīrums ir lietojams ar nosacījumu, ka tas neradīs nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienai stacijai, kura darbojas atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un neprasīs no tām aizsardzību.5.1.8. Atkārtotajā paziņojumā jāiekļauj arī notificējošās administrācijas parakstīta apņemšanās, kurā norādīts, ka saskaņā ar 5.1.7. punktu ierakstīšanai MIFR iesniegtais piešķīrums neradīs nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienai tās administrācijas stacijai, ar kuru joprojām nav panākta vienošanās un kuras stacija darbojas atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem un ir ierakstīta MIFR ar labvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.31. un 11.34. punktu, un neprasīs no tām aizsardzību.5.1.9. Ja šāda piešķīruma lietošana rada nepieļaujamus traucējumus kādam tās administrācijas piešķīrumam, ar kuru joprojām nav panākta vienošanās, un ja šo piešķīrumu lieto atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un tas ir ierakstīts MIFR ar labvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.31. un 11.34. punktu, administrācija, kas rada nepieļaujamus traucējumus, saņemot paziņojumu par to, nekavējoties novērš šos traucējumus.5.2. Citu primāro zemes dienestu frekvences piešķīrumu notifikācija5.2.1. Ja administrācija grib uzsākt citu primāro zemes dienestu piešķīrumu izmantošanu, tā piešķīrumu notificē birojam saskaņā ar Radionoteikumu 11. pantu.5.2.2. Saskaņā ar biroja veikto pārbaudi par atbilstību Nolīgumam, birojs izskata paziņojumu attiecībā uz Nolīguma 4.2. punktā noteiktās procedūras sekmīgu izmantošanu.5.2.3. Ja 5.2.2. punktā minētās pārbaudes secinājums ir labvēlīgs, piešķīrums jāieraksta MIFR. Pretējās gadījumā paziņojumu, kā arī tā pamatojumu nosūta atpakaļ notificējošai administrācijai.5.2.4. Ja administrācija paziņojumu iesniedz atkārtoti un, to atkārtoti izskatot birojā saskaņā ar minēto 5.2.2. punktu, pārbaudes secinājums ir labvēlīgs, piešķīrumu attiecīgi ieraksta MIFR.5.2.5. Ja, atkārtoti izskatot saskaņā ar 5.2.2. punktu, secinājums ir nelabvēlīgs, piešķīrums jāieraksta ar labvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.31. punktu un ar nelabvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.34. punktu, kā arī ar tās(-
6. o)administrācijas(-
7. u)nosaukumu(-iem), ar kuru joprojām nav panākta vienošanās, norādot, ka attiecībā uz šo(-īm) administrāciju(-ām) ierakstītais piešķīrums ir lietojams ar nosacījumu, ka tas neradīs nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienai stacijai, kura darbojas atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un neprasīs no tām aizsardzību.5.2.6. Atkārtotajā paziņojumā jāiekļauj arī notificējošās administrācijas parakstīta apņemšanās, kurā norādīts, ka saskaņā ar 5.2.5. punktu ierakstīšanai MIFR iesniegtais piešķīrums neradīs nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienai tās administrācijas stacijai, ar kuru joprojām nav panākta vienošanās un kuras stacijas darbojas atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un ir ierakstītas MIFR ar labvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.31. un 11.34. punktu, un neprasīs no tām aizsardzību.5.2.7. Ja šāda piešķīruma lietošana rada nepieļaujamus traucējumus kādam tās administrācijas piešķīrumam, ar kuru joprojām nav panākta vienošanās, un, ja šādu piešķīrumu pielieto atbilstīgi Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un tas ir ierakstīts MIFR ar labvēlīgu secinājumu attiecībā uz Radionoteikumu 11.31. un 11.34. punktu, administrācija, kas izraisa nepieļaujamus traucējumus, saņemot paziņojumu par tiem, nekavējoties novērš šos traucējumus.6. PANTSDomstarpību izšķiršanaJa pēc iepriekšējos pantos izklāstītās procedūras izmantošanas attiecīgās administrācijas nav spējušas panākt vienošanos, tās var izmantot Konstitūcijas 56. pantā minēto procedūru. Tās var arī vienoties par to, ka piemēro fakultatīvo protokolu par to domstarpību obligāto izšķiršanu, kas attiecas uz ITU konstitūciju, ITU konvenciju un administratīvajiem noteikumiem.7. PANTSPievienošanās Nolīgumam7.1. Jebkura dalībvalsts Plānošanas apgabalā, kas nav parakstījusi Nolīgumu, jebkurā laikā var deponēt pievienošanās dokumentu ģenerālsekretāram, kas nekavējoties attiecīgi informē pārējās dalībvalstis. Nolīgumam pievienojas, parakstot to bez atrunām, un pievienošanās attiecas uz Plāniem, kādi tie ir pievienošanās brīdī.7.2. Pievienošanās Nolīgumam stājas spēkā tajā datumā, kad ģenerālsekretārs saņem pievienošanās dokumentu.8. PANTSNolīguma piemērošanas joma8.1. Nolīgums ir saistošs Līgumslēdzējām pusēm to savstarpējās attiecībās, bet nav saistošs to pušu attiecībās ar dalībvalstīm, kas nav Līgumslēdzējas puses.8.2. Ja Līgumslēdzēja puse paraksta Nolīgumu ar atrunām par kāda Nolīguma noteikuma piemērošanu, pārējās Līgumslēdzējas puses savstarpējās attiecībās ar pusi, kas ir parakstījusi Nolīgumu ar šādām atrunām, var neņemt vērā minēto noteikumu.9. PANTSNolīguma apstiprināšanaDalībvalstis, kas ir parakstījušas Nolīgumu, pēc iespējas drīz par Nolīguma apstiprināšanu paziņo ģenerālsekretāram, kas nekavējoties attiecīgi informē pārējās dalībvalstis.10. PANTSNolīguma denonsēšana10.1. Jebkura Līgumslēdzēja puse jebkurā laikā var denonsēt Nolīgumu, nosūtot paziņojumu ģenerālsekretāram, kas attiecīgi informē pārējās dalībvalstis.10.2. Denonsēšana stājas spēkā vienu gadu pēc datuma, kad ģenerālsekretārs saņem notifikāciju par denonsēšanu.10.3. Datumā, kad denonsēšana stājas spēkā, birojs svītro no Plāniem piešķīrumus un/vai Plāna iedalījumus, kuri ir ierakstīti attiecīgās dalībvalsts vārdā, kas denonsējusi Nolīgumu.11. PANTSNolīguma pārskatīšana11.1. Nolīgumu var pārskatīt tikai kompetenta Reģionāla radiosakaru konference, ko sasauc saskaņā ar Konstitūcijā un Konvencijā noteikto procedūru un uz kuru uzaicina visas dalībvalstis Plānošanas apgabalā.12. PANTSNolīguma stāšanās spēkā, darbības termiņš un iepriekšēja izmantošana12.1. Nolīgums stājas spēkā 2007. gada 17. jūnijā pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika.12.2. Nolīguma noteikumus izmanto iepriekš no 2006. gada 17. jūnija pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika.12.3. No 12.2. punktā minētā datuma apraides stacijas, kas darbojas frekvences piešķīrumos, kuri nav Plānos vai kuri neatbilst Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem (sk. 5. panta 5.1.2. punktu), drīkst turpināt darbību saskaņā ar nosacījumiem, ka tās neradīs nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienam piešķīrumam, kas atbilst Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem, un neprasīs no tiem aizsardzību.12.4. Nolīgums ir spēkā līdz tā pārskatīšanai saskaņā ar Nolīguma 11. pantu.12.5. Pārejas periods sākas 2006. gada 17. jūnijā pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika. Pārejas periodā ir jāaizsargā piešķīrumi analogajā Plānā (kas noteikti 3. panta 3.1.2. punktā).12.6. Pārejas periods beidzas 2015. gada 17. jūnijā pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika. Tomēr turpmāk minētajā zemsvītras piezīmē uzskaitītajām valstīm7 174 - 230 MHz frekvenču joslā8 pārejas periods beidzas 2020. gada 17. jūnijā pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika. Pēc piemērojamā pārejas perioda beigām birojam jāanulē atbilstošie ieraksti analogajā Plānā un jābeidz pielietot atbilstošo valstu analogajiem piešķīrumiem4. panta 4.1. punktā minētie noteikumi, kas attiecas uz izmaiņām analogajā Plānā, unpiezīmes, kas attiecas uz analogajiem piešķīrumiem.12.7. Pēc iepriekš minētā pārejas perioda beigām birojam jāpārskata to piešķīrumu statuss, kas ir analogajā Plānā un ierakstīti MIFR, un jāuzaicina administrācijas anulēt atbilstošos ierakstus MIFR.12.8. Izbeidzoties biroja veiktajiem pasākumiem saskaņā ar 12.7. punktu, administrācijas var pieprasīt, lai birojs anulē atbilstošos piešķīrumus, vai turpināt to izmantošanu saskaņā ar nosacījumiem, ka šie analogie piešķīrumi:
8. a)bija analogajā Plānā un jau bija uzsākta to izmantošana, unb) nerada nepieļaujamus traucējumus nevienam piešķīrumam, kas atbilst Nolīgumam un ar to saistītajiem Plāniem (sk. 5. panta 5.1.2. punktu), un neprasa no tiem aizsardzību.12.9. Birojs attiecīgi aktualizē MIFR.TO APLIECINOT, turpmāk minētie Starptautiskās Telesakaru savienības dalībvalstu attiecīgā Plānošanas apgabala delegāti savu atbilstošo kompetento institūciju vārdā parakstīja šā nobeiguma tiesību akta vienu eksemplāru. Domstarpību gadījumā noteicošais teksts ir franču valodā. Šis eksemplārs tiek deponēts Savienības arhīvā. Ģenerālsekretārs vienu apliecinātu dokumenta norakstu nosūta katrai Starptautiskās Telesakaru savienības dalībvalstij attiecīgajā Plānošanas apgabalā.Ženēvā, 2006. gada 16. jūnijāAlbānijas Republikas vārdā:Hidajets KOPANI [Hydajet KOPANI]Alžīrijas Tautas Demokrātiskās Republikas vārdā:El Kaders IBIRS [El Kader IBRIR ]Muhameds MADURS [Mohamed MADOUR]Slimans DŽEMATENE [Slimane DJEMATENE]A. El Maleks HUJŪ [A. El Malek HOUYOU]Vācijas Federatīvās Republikas vārdā:Gērolds REIHLS [Gerold REICHLE]Andoras Firstistes vārdā:Ksavjē HIMENESS-BELTRANS [Xavier JIMENEZ-BELTRAN]Angolas Republikas vārdā:Domingo Karloss OLIVEIRA [Domingos Carlos OLIVEIRA]Oktavio Domingo MAČADO [Octavio Domingos MACHADO]Saūda Arābijas Karalistes vārdā:Habībs K. AL-ŠANKITI [Habeeb K. AL-SHANKITI]Rijads K. NAJMS [Riyadh K. NAJM]Sulaimans AL-SAMNANS [Sulaiman AL-SAMNAN]Saūds AL-RAŠĪDS [Saud AL-RASHEED]Tariks M. AL-AMRI [Tariq M. AL-AMRI]Vesams A. ŠEIHS [Wesam A. SHEIKH]Armēnijas Republikas vārdā:Ašots VERDJANS [Ashot VERDYAN]Austrijas vārdā:Francis PRULLS [Franz PRULL]Pēters REINDLS [Peter REINDL]Azerbaidžānas Republikas vārdā:Gulāms ABDULĀJEVS [Gulām ABDULLAYEV]Bahreinas Karalistes vārdā:A.S. AL-TAVADI [A.S. AL-THAWADI ]Hešams K. AL-BINKALILS [Hesham K. AL-BINKHALIL]Baltkrievijas Republikas vārdā:Vladimirs TESĻUKS [Vladimir TESLYUK]Beļģijas vārdā:Fredijs BĒRTS [Freddy BAERT]Severīna DIONA [Sēverine DYON]Patriks VAN DER GRAHTS [Patrick VAN DER GRACHT]Bosnijas un Hercegovinas vārdā:Jadranka KALMETA [Jadranka KALMETA]Botsvānas Republikas vārdā:Katberts M. LEKAUKAU [Cuthbert M. LEKAUKAU]Čoganetso KEPALETSVE [Tshoganetso KEPALETSWE]Kingslijs RĪTSANGS [Kingsley REETSANG]Biopsu KOBEDI [Boipuso KOBEDI ]Tapelo MARUPINGS [Thapelo MARUPING]Batopi LŪKS [Bathopi LUKE]Bulgārijas Republikas vārdā:Dimitars STANČEVS [Dimitar STANTCHEV]Božidars KOŽUAZOVS [Bozhidar KOZHUHAZOV]Svilens POPOVS [Svilen POPOV]Georgijs KOLEVS [Georgi KOLEV]Burkinafaso vārdā:Soleimans ZABRE [Souleimane ZABRE]Issa C. Ignāss SIMPORE [Issa C. Ignace SIMPORE]Burundi Republikas vārdā:Džozefs NSEGANA [Joseph NSEGANA]Kamerūnas Republikas vārdā:Gijoms Pols MUTE [Guillaume Paul MOUTE]El Hadjars ABDURAMANS [El Hadjar ABDOURAMANE]Hileirs MBEGA [Hilaire MBEGA]Bonifass TAKŪ [Boniface TAKOU ]Avalu MUHAMADU [Avvallou MOUHAMADOU]Mu Desirs NDONGO [Mue Desire NDONGO]Kaboverdes Republikas vārdā:Deivids GOMESS [David GOMES]Ana Kristīna Monteiro LIMA [Ana Cristina Monteiro LIMA]Kipras Republikas vārdā:Andronikos KAKURAS [Andronikos KAKKOURAS]Vatikāna Pilsētvalsts vārdā:Kostantino PASIFIKS [Costantino PACIFICI]Džudiči PJERVINČENCO [Giudici PIERVINCENZO]Kongo Republikas vārdā:M. AKUALA [M. AKOUALA ]Žans MAKUNDU [Jean MAKOUNDOU]Kotdivuāras Republikas vārdā:Klods DASIS BEKE [Claude DASSYS BEKE]Žans Batists JAO KUAKU [Jean-Baptiste YAO KOUAKOU]Aleksis KOFI KUMANS [Alexis KOFFI KOUMAN]Simons KOFI [Simon KOFFI ]Afu AKAFU [Affou AKAFFOU]Horvātijas Republikas vārdā:Dražens BREGLEČS [Drazen BREGLEC]Kreso ANTONOVIČS [Kreso ANTONOVIC]Zeļko TABAKOVIČS [Zeljko TABAKOVIC]Gašpers GAČINA [Gasper GACINA]Dānijas vārdā:Jorgens Langs NĪLSENS [Jorgen Lang NIELSEN]Peters Marlau KNUDSENS [Peter Marlau KNUDSEN ]Henings ANDERSENS [Henning ANDERSEN]Džibutijas Republikas vārdā:Murads Hasans BOGOREHS [Mourad Hassan BOGOREH]Ēģiptes Arābu Republikas vārdā:Laila Huseina HAMDALA [Laila Hussein HAMDALLAH]Esmails ELGUTANI [Esmail ELGHUTTANY]Apvienoto Arābu Emirātu vārdā:Tariks A. AL-AVADI Nasers AL-RAŠEDI [Tariq A. AL-AWADHI Naser AL-RASHEDI]Mustafa Hamuda IŠAGS [Mustafa Hamouda ISHAG]Spānijas vārdā:Antonio FERNANDESS-PANIAGUA [Antonio FERNANDEZ-PANIAGUA]Hosē Ramons KAMBLORS [Jose Ramon CAMBLOR]Igaunijas Republikas vārdā:Arvo RAMMUS [Arvo RAMMUS]Krievijas Federācijas vārdā:Andrejs BESKOROVAINIJS [Andrey BESKOROVAYNY]Viktors STRELETS [Victor STRELETS]Somijas vārdā:Kirsi KARLAMĀ [Kirsi KARLAMAA]Kari KANGAS [Kari KANGAS]Francijas vārdā:Arno MIKELS [Arnaud MIQUEL]Fransuā RANSĪ [Francois RANCY ]Dominiks Žans ROFLO [Dominique Jean ROLFO]Gabonas Republikas vārdā:Žaks EDANS NKVELE [Jacques EDANE NKWELE ]Viljams MUNGALA [William MOUNGALA]Firmins NGOJE Francis IMUNGA [Firmin NGOYE Francis IMOUNGA ]Žils LEŅOŽO [Jules LEGNONGO]Žans-Žaks MASIMA LANDŽI [Jean-Jacques MASSIMA LANDJI]Gambijas Republikas vārdā:Famars DAMFA [Famara DAMPHA]Bai Babuka SAN JANGS [Bai Baboucar SAN YANG]Gruzijas vārdā:Mihails GOTOŠIA [Mikheil GOTOSHIA]Ganas vārdā:Emanuels OVUSU-ADANSI [Emmanuel OWUSU-ADANSI]Grieķijas vārdā:Nisims BENMAJORS [Nissim BENMAYOR ]Georgs DROSOS [George DROSSOS]Gvinejas Republikas vārdā:Abduls Azizs BARIJS [Abdoul Aziz BARRY ]Ibrahima Kenda SUARE [Ibrahima Kenda SOUARE]Habibs TALS [Habib TALL]Ungārijas Republikas vārdā:Eržibeta BANKUTI [Erzsebet BANKUTI]Peters VARI [Peter VARI]Irānas Islāma Republikas vārdā:Mahmuds KOSRAVI [Mahmoud KHOSRAVI]Abdolali ALIASKARI [Abdolali ALIASKARI]Tagi ŠAFIE Hoseins ABEDIANS [Taghi SHAFIEE Hossein ABEDIAN]Irākas Republikas vārdā:Vesals A. ALI [Wesall A. ALI]Īrijas vārdā:Džons A.C. BRĪNS [John A.C. BREEN ]Rorijs A.J. HINČIJS [Rory A.J. HINCHY]Nīls O'BRAIENS [Neil O'BRIEN]Aleksandrs KRASNOJENS [Alexander KRASNOJEN]Izraēlas Valsts vārdā:Haims MAZARS [Haim MAZAR]Itālijas vārdā:Frančesko TROĪZI [Francesco TROISI]Mario TADŽIULLO [Mario TAGIULLO]Rikardo DE LEONARDIS [Riccardo DE LEONARDIS]Donato MARGARELLA [Donato MARGARELLA]Jordānijas Hāšimītu Karalistes vārdā:M. AL-VATIKS ŠAKRA [M. AL-WATHIQ SHAQRAH]Kazahstānas Republikas vārdā:Rizats NURŠABEKOVS [Rizat NURSHABEKOV]Kenijas Republikas vārdā:Stenlijs K. KIBE [Stanley K. KIBE]Leo K. BORUETS [Leo K. BORUETT]Daniels O. OBAMS [Daniel O. OBAM]Samvels O. OTIENO [Samwel O. OTIENO]Alfreds M. AMBANI [Alfred M. AMBANI]Kuveitas Valsts vārdā:Naši AL KATANI [Nashi AL QAHTANI]Jusefs AL-SAADS [Yousef AL-SAAD]Lesoto Karalistes vārdā:Sello LEJAKANS [Sello LEJAKANE]Tlali MANOSA [Tlali MANOSA]Latvijas Republikas vārdā:Inārs JĒKABSONS [Inars JEKABSONS]Juris VALENIEKS [Juris VALENIEKS]Juris RENCIS [Juris RENCIS]Bijušās Dienvidslāvijas Maķedonijas Republikas vārdā:Mails VEĻANOVS [Mile VELJANOV]Libānas vārdā:Moriss GAZALS [Maurice GHAZAL]Lihtenšteinas Firstistes vārdā:Kurts BtJHLERS [Kurt BtJHLER]Lietuvas Republikas vārdā:V. KISONAS [V. KISONAS]M. ŽILINSKIS [M. ZILINSKAS]Luksemburgas vārdā:Rolands TURMESS [Roland THURMES]Malāvijas vārdā:Maiks KUNTIJA [Mike KUNTIYA]Villis D. LIPANDE [Willis D. LIPANDE]Loids MOMBA [Lloyd MOMBA]Mali Republikas vārdā:Seku KULIBALI [Sekou COULIBALY]Nuhums TRAORE [Nouhoum TRAORE]Banglejs-Fode TRAORE [Bangaly-Fode TRAORE]L.B. MAIGA [LB. MAIGA]A.A.M. CISSE [A.A.M. CISSE]Muhameds AG HAMATI [Mohamed AG HAMATI]Amadu DIAO [Amadou DIAO]Maltas vārdā:Saviors F. BORGS [Saviour F. BORG]Džozefs SPITERI [Joseph SPITERI]Adrians GALEA [Adrian GALEA]Marokas Karalistes vārdā:Muhameds LULIČKI [Mohammed LOULICHKI]Muhameds HAMUDA [Mohammed HAMMOUDA]Mustafa BESSI [Mustapha BESSI]Muhameds Mamons SBAJS [Mohamed Mamoun SBAY]Abderahims KHAFADŽI [Abderrahim KHAFAJI]Nabili EL MERNISI [Nabila EL MERNISSI]Adils ARAMJA [Adil ARAMJA]Mauritānijas Islāma Republikas vārdā:Muhameds Vadels OLDS TABU [Mohamed Vadel OULD TABOU]Moldovas Republikas vārdā:Andrejs NEMTANU [Andrei NEMTANU]Teodors KIKLIČI [Teodor CICLICCI]Jevgēnijs ŠESTAKOVS [Eughenii SESTACOV]Monako Firstistes vārdā:Kerola LANTERI [Carole LANTERI]Mozambikas Republikas vārdā:Hilario Lorino TAMELE [Hilario Lourino TAMELE]Martins S. LANGA [Martins S. LANGA]Namībijas Republikas vārdā:Bartoss HARA-GAEBS [Barthos HARA-GAEB]Nigēras Republikas vārdā:Abdu SALU [Abdou SALOU]Nigērijas Federatīvās Republikas vārdā:Abajomi BOLARINAVA [Abayomi BOLARINWA]Edvards Idris AMANA [Edward Idris AMANA]Adams ABDU [Adamu ABDU]Muhameds UMARU [Muhammed UMARU]Norvēģijas vārdā:Geirs Jāns SUNDĀLS [Geir Jan SUNDAL]Omānas Sultanāta vārdā:Jusufs ALABALUŠI [Yousuf ALBALUSHI]Ugandas Republikas vārdā:Džeks TURIAMVIJUKA [Jack TURYAMWIJUKA]Jonass M. BANTULAKI [Jonas M. BANTULAKI]Uzbekistānas Republikas vārdā:M. KALMURATOVA [M. KHALMURATOVA]Nīderlandes Karalistes vārdā:Bārts ŠĀPS A. VAN DIJKENS Bens SMITS [Bart SCHAAP A. VAN DIJKEN Ben SMITH]Polijas Republikas vārdā:Kristīna ROSLANA-KŪNA [Krystyna ROSLAN-KUHN]Pāvels KAČKI [Pawel KACKI]Dariušs VIEČEKS [Dariusz WIECEK]Arkadiušs KUREKS [Arkadiusz KUREK]Radoslavs TIONOVS [Radoslaw TYNIOW]Portugāles vārdā:Marija F. SANTOSA SILVA HIRAO [Maria F. SANTOS SILVA GIRAO]Migels J. DA KOŠTA M. ENRIKESS [Miguel J. DA COSTA M. HENRIQUES]Kataras Valsts vārdā:Jusufs AL-KUBAISI [Yousuf A. AL-KUBAISI]Sīrijas Arābu Republikas vārdā:Mustafa AJENEHS [Moustafa AJENEH]Muhameds HASANS [Mohammad HASAN]Adnans SALHABS [Adnan SALHAB]Kirgizstānas Republikas vārdā:Baišs NURMATOVS [Baiysh NURMATOV]Slovākijas Republikas vārdā:Milans LUKNARS [Milan LUKNAR]Čehijas Republikas vārdā:Pāvels DVORŽĀKS [Pavel DVORAK]Rumānijas vārdā:Florīns BEJANS [Florin BEJAN]Ketlīna M. MARINEŠKU [Catalin M. MARINESCU]Lielbritānijas un Ziemeļīrijas Apvienotās Karalistes vārdā:Maikls GODĀRS [Michael GODDARD]Malkolms DŽONSONS [Malcolm JOHNSON]Ruandas Republikas vārdā:Abrahams MAKUZA [Abraham MAKUZA]Čārlzs NAHAJO [Charles NAHAYO]Didjē RUBAJIZA KAJITANA [Didier RUBAYIZA KAYITANA]Sanmarīno Republikas vārdā:Mišela DŽIRI [Michele GIRI]Senegālas Republikas vārdā:Mahtars FALS [Makhtar FALL]Mamadu FATIJS [Mamadou FATY]Serbijas Republikas vārdā:Dragana KURČIČA [Dragana CURCIC]Slavenko RASAJSKIS [Slavenko RASAJSKI]Petars STEFANOVIČS [Petar STEFANOVIC]Marija RAIKOVIČA [Marija RAICKOVIC]Natālija VARAGIČA [Natalija VARAGIC]Slovēnijas Republikas vārdā:Matjāšs JANSA [Matjaz JANSA]Mihaels KRISEĻS [Mihael KRISELJ]Igors FUNS [Igor FUNA]Franks KOVAČIČS [Franc KOVACIC]Sudānas Republikas vārdā:Muhameds ABD ELMAGIDS [Mohamed ABD ELMAGID]Dienvidāfrikas Republikas vārdā:Nomakamasu Ingrīda PONI [Nomacamasu Ingrid PONI]Zviedrijas vārdā:Anderss FREDERIKSS [Anders FREDERICH]Pērs KJELLINS [Per KJELLIN]Persijs PĒTERSONS [Percy PETTERSSON]Šveices Konfederācijas vārdā:Peters B. PAULI [Peter B. PAULI]Svazilendas Karalistes vārdā:Ostins M. MGABI [Austin M. MGABHI]Tadžikistānas Republikas vārdā:S. DUDARAU [S. DUDARAU]Tanzānijas Apvienotās Republikas vārdā:J.S. NKOMA [J.S. NKOMA]J.S. KILONGOLA [J.S. KILONGOLA]N. Habi GUNIJE [N. Habbi GUNYE]A.J. KISAKA [A.J. KISAKA]Johanness A.K. MAGESA [Johannes A.K. MAGESA]T.A. USI [T.A. USI]Ali H. Ajubs [Ali H. Ayub]Čadas Republikas vārdā:Girdons MOGALBAJE [Guirdona MOGALBAYE]Ali Idriss AHMEDS [Ali Idriss AHMED]Togo Republikas vārdā:Massina PALOKI Gaba S. MAVOKO [Massina PALOUKI Gaba S. MAWOUKO]Lalle KANAKE [Lalle KANAKE]Tunisijas vārdā:Muhameds BONGUJS [Mohammed BONGUI]Lilija SUSSI [Lilia SOUSSI]Mohsens GOMMANS [Mohsen GHOMMAN M]Turcijas vārdā:Taifuns AKARERS [Tayfun ACARER]Ali ZORS [Ali ZOR]Erkāns KĀNS [Erkan CAN]Ukrainas vārdā:Vasils HANDABURA [Vasyl HANDABURA]Oļena ULAŠENKO [Olena ULASENKO]Jemenas Republikas vārdā:Muhameds Ali AL-AZZANI [Mohamed Ali AL-AZZANI]Zambijas Republikas vārdā:Kefas MASIJE [Kephas MASIYE]Kezias MVALE [Kezias MWALE]Zimbabves Republikas vārdā:Oberts MUGANIJURA [Obert MUGANYURA]Matiass ČAKANIJUKA [Matthias CHAKANYUKA]1 Konferencē bija divas sesijas:pirmā sesija, kuras uzdevums bija sagatavot ziņojumu otrajai sesijai, notika Ženēvā 2004. gadā no 10. maija līdz 28. maijam;otrā sesija, kuras uzdevums bija izstrādāt Nolīgumu un ar to saistītos Plānus, notika Ženēvā 2006. gadā no 15. maija līdz 16. jūnijam.2 Pēc pārejas perioda beigām Plānos ir tikai ciparu Plāns.3 Marokai analogais Plāns ietver 170 - 230 MHz frekvenču joslu.4 Ja nav nolūka iekļaut piešķīrumus ciparu Plānā, administrācijām 5. pants jāizmanto tieši.5 Ja piešķīrumi izriet no iedalījuma ciparu Plānā, kam ir piezīmes Plāna "piezīmju" ailēs, šīs piezīmes attiecina uz minētajiem piešķīrumiem.6 Šis noteikums pēc pārejas perioda beigām nav piemērojams analogajam Plānam.7 Valstu saraksts - Alžīrija (Tautas Demokrātiskā Republika), Burkinafaso, Čada (Republika), Ēģipte (Arābu Republika), Gabonas Republika, Gana, Gvineja (Republika), Irāna (Islāma Republika), Jemena (Republika), Jordānija (Hāšimītu Karaliste), Kamerūna (Republika), Kongo (Republika), Kotdivuāra (Republika), Mali (Republika), Maroka (Karaliste), Mauritānija (Islāma Republika), Nigērija (Federatīvā Republika), Sīrijas Arābu Republika, Sudāna (Republika), Togo Republika, Tunisija.Šādām administrācijām, kas nepiedalījās RRC-06 konferencē, proti, Beninas (Republikas), Centrālāfrikas Republikas, Eritrejas, Etiopijas (Federatīvās Demo-krātiskās Republikas), Gvinejas-Bisavas (Republikas), Ekvatoriālās Gvinejas (Republikas), Libērijas (Republikas), Madagaskaras (Republikas), Nigērijas (Republikas), Kongo Demokrātiskās Republikas, Santomes un Prinsipes (Demokrātiskās Republikas), Sjerraleones un Somālijas Demokrātiskās Republikas, pārejas periods VHF frekvenču joslā (174 - 230 MHz) beidzas 2020. gada 17. jūnijā pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika, ja kāda no minētajām administrācijām 90 dienu periodā pēc RRC-06 konferences beigām nepaziņo birojam, ka tā izvēlas 2015. gada 17. jūniju pulksten 00.01 pēc UTC koordinētā universālā laika.8 Marokai 170 - 230 MHz. REGIONAL AGREEMENT* Relating to the planning of the digital terrestrial broadcasting service in Region I (parts of Region I situated to the west of meridian 170o E and to the north of parallel 40o S, except the territory of Mongolia) and in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the frequency bands 174-230 MHz and 470-862 MHz (Geneva, 2006)PREAMBLEThe undersigned delegates of the following Member States of the International Telecommunication Union:Republic of Albania, People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, Federal Republic of Germany, Principality of Andorra, Republic of Angola, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijani Republic, Kingdom of Bahrain, Republic of Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Botswana, Republic of Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Republic of Burundi, Republic of Cameroon, Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cyprus, Vatican City State, Republic of the Congo, Republic of Cote d'Ivore, Republic of Croatia, Denmark, Republic of Djibouti, Arab Republic of Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Spain, Republic of Estonia, Federation of Russian, Finland, France, Gabonese Republic, Republic of Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Greece, Republic of Guinea, Republic of Hungary, Islamic Republic of Iran, Republic of Iraq, Ireland, State of Israel, Italy, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, State of Kuwait, Kingdom of Lesotho, Republic of Latvia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Lebanon, Principality of Liechtenstein, Republic of Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Republic of Mali, Malta, Kingdom of Morocco, Islamic Republic of Mauritania, Republic of Moldova, Principality of Monaco, Republic of Mozambique, Republic of Namibia, Republic of Niger, Federal Republic of Nigeria, Norway, Sultanate of Oman, Republic of Uganda, Republic of Uzbekistan, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Republic of Poland, Portugal, Satte f Qatar, Syrian Arab Republic, Kyrgyz Republic, Slovak Republic, Czech Republic, Romania, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Rwanda, Republic of San Marino, Republic of Senegal, Republic of Serbia, Republic of Slovenia, Republic of the Soudan, Republic of South Africa, Sweden, Confederation of Switzerland, Kingdom of Swaziland, Republic of Tajikistan, United Republic of Tanzania, Republic of Chad, Togolese Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Republic of Yemen, Republic of Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe,meeting in Geneva from 15 May to 16 June 2006 for a Regional Radiocommunication Conference convened under the terms of the ITU Constitution and the ITU Convention, as referred to in Article I of this Agreement, have adapted, subject to approval by their competent authorities, the following provisions concerning the terrestrial broadcasting service in the frequency bands 174-230 MHZ1 and 470-862 MHz, together with provisions for other primary terrestrial services, as defined in Article I of this Agreement in Region I (parts of Region I situated to the west of meridian 170o E and to the north of parallel 40o S, except the territory of Mongolia) and in the Islamic Republic of Iran.______________1For Morocco, the adequate plan covers the band 170-230 MHz* The provisions of this agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis, to Palestine as referred to in Resolution 99 (Minneapolis, 1998) subject to Palestine notifying the ITU Secretary-General that it accepts the rights and commits to observe the obligations arising therefrom.ARTICLE 1Definitions1 For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaningsdefined below:1.1 Union: The International Telecommunication Union.1.2 Secretary-General: The Secretary-General of the Union.1.3 Bureau: The Radiocommunication Bureau.1.4 Constitution: The Constitution of the Union.1.5 Convention: The Convention of the Union.1.6 Radio Regulations: The Radio Regulations as referred to in No. 31 of the Constitution.1.7 Conference: The Regional Radiocommunication Conference 2006 for the planning of the digital terrestrial broadcasting service in Region 1 (parts of Region 1 situated to the west of meridian 170° E and to the noilb QfpaxsAM 4&° lite itOTTforRSf ofjMmgoiYa/ and in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the frequency bands 174-230 MHz and 470-862 MHz (Geneva, 2006) (RRC-06)1.1.8 Planning Area: Region 1 (those parts of Region 1, as defined in No. 5.3 of the Radio Regulations, situated to the west of meridian 170° E and to the north of parallel 40° S, except the territories of Mongolia) and the Islamic Republic of Iran.1.9 Agreement: The Regional Agreement and its Annexes together with its associated Plans as drawn up by the Conference.1.10 Plans: The analogue Plan and the digital Plan as specified in § 3.1 of Article 3 of this Agreement and as subsequently updated through the successful application of the procedure of § 4.1 of Article 4 of this Agreement.1.11 Contracting Member: Any Member State from the Planning Area which has approved

acceded to the Agreement.1.12 Administration: Unless otherwise indicated, the term Administration designates the Administration, as defined in No. 1002 of the Constitution, of a Contracting Member.1.13 MIFR: Master International Frequency Register.1.14 Other primary terrestrial services: The primary terrestrial services other than the broadcasting service, and the primary radio astronomy service, to which the frequency bands 174-230 MHz and/

470-862 MHz are allocated in the Planning Area in accordance with Article 5 of the Radio Regulations.1.15 Existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services (referred to in short as the "List"): Assignments to other primary terrestrial services contained in Annex 5 to the Agreement, as established by the Conference, and assignments to other primary terrestrial services for which the procedure of § 4.2 of Article 4 of this Agreement has been successfully applied.1.16 Transition period: The period following the Conference during which the assignments in the analogue Plan (as specified in § 3.1.2 of Article 3 of this Agreement) shall be protected (see also Article 12 of this Agreement).1.17 BR IFIC: Radiocommunication Bureau International Frequency Information Circular._______________________1 This Conference was held in two sessions:the first session, responsible for preparing a report to the second session, was held in Geneva from 10 to 28 May 2004;the second session, responsible for drawing up an Agreement and associated Plans, was held in Geneva from 15 May to 16 June 2006.ARTICLE 2Execution of the Agreement2.1 The Contracting Members shall adopt the characteristics specified in the Plans for their broadcasting stations in the Planning Area operating in the frequency bands referred to in Article 3 of'this Agreement.2.2 The Contracting Members shall not modify these characteristics

establish stations, except under the relevant provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of this Agreement.2.3 The Contracting Members shall undertake to apply the relevant provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of this Agreement for the other primary terrestrial services to which these bands are also allocated.ARTICLE 3Annexes to the Agreement3.1 Annex 1: Frequency Plans23.1.1 The digital Plan consisting of two parts: the 174-230 MHz band and the 470-862 MHz band (comprising T-DAB Plan assignments, T-DAB Plan allotments, DVB-T Plan assignments, DVB-T Plan allotments).3.1.2 The analogue Plan consisting of two parts: the 174-230 MHz3 band and the 470-862 MHz band.3.2 Annex 2: Technical elements and criteria used in the development of the Plan and theimplementation of the Agreement.3.3 Annex 3: Basic characteristics to be submitted in application of the Agreement.3.4 Annex 43.4.1 Section I: Limits and methodology for determining when agreement with another administration is required.3.4.2 Section II: Examination of conformity with the digital Plan entry.3.5 Annex 5: List of assignments to other primary terrestrial services as referred to in §1.15 of Article 1 of'the Agreement._________________2 After the expiry of the Transition period, the Plans will only contain the digital Plan.3 For Morocco, the analogue Plan covers the band 170-230 MHz.ARTICLE 4Procedure for modifications to the Plans and procedure for coordination of other primary terrestrial services4.1 Modifications to the Plans4.1.1 When an administration proposes to make a modification to the digital Plan

theanalogue Plan, i.e. in cases where an administration needs:a) to change the characteristics of an allotment,

of an assignment to a broadcasting station, appearing in the Plans;

b) to add to the Plans an allotment,

an assignment to a broadcasting station;

c) to add to the digital Plan an assignment stemming from an allotment in the digital Plan4;

d) to cancel from the Plans an allotment,

an assignment to a broadcasting station, this administration shall apply the procedure contained in this Article before any notification is made under Article 5.4.1.2 Initiation of the modification procedure4.1.2.1 Any administration proposing to change the characteristics of an assignment/allotment appearing in the Plans,

to add a new assignment/allotment to the Plans, shall seek the agreement of any other administration whose broadcasting service and/

other primaiy terrestrial services are considered to be affected.4.1.2.2 An administration is considered to be affected in respect of its broadcasting service when the limits given in Section I of Annex 4 are exceeded.4.1.2.3 An administration is considered to be affected in respect of its other primary terrestrial services when the limits given in Section I of Annex 4 are exceeded for any of the following assignments:

1. a)existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services;
2. b)assignments to other primary terrestrial services for which the procedure for coordination with the broadcasting service under § 4.2 has been initiated, i.e. for which the complete information referred to in § 4.2.2.6 has been received by the Bureau.4.1.2.4 The agreement referred to in § 4.1.2.1 is not required if:
3. a)none of the corresponding limits in Section 1 of Annex 4 referred to in § 4.1.2.2 and § 4.1.2.3 are exceeded;

b) the proposed modification relates to changes in the technical characteristics which do not increase the existing level of interference and do not increase the existing level of protection required.4.1.2.5 An administration proposing to modify the Plans shall communicate to the Bureau the relevant characteristics listed in Annex 3, in electronic form, and shall also indicate, if appropriate, the names of any administrations which have already agreed to the proposed modification on the basis of the characteristics communicated to the Bureau.This communication shall also be considered by the Bureau, if so requested, as a request to apply the procedure contained in § 4.1.5.3 in the following cases:no agreements are required under § 4.1.2.4 and no administration's name is included under § 4.1.3.2;

all agreements have been received and no administration's name is removed under § 4.1.2.9

included under § 4.1.3.2.4.1.2.6 If the characteristics submitted under § 4.1.2.5 are found to be incomplete, the Bureau shall immediately seek from the administration proposing to modify the Plans any clarification required and the information not provided.4.1.2.7 In application of § 4.1.1 c), if the Bureau finds that, in the case of a conversion of an allotment into one

several assignments, the conditions in Section II of Annex 4 are met, the provisions of §4.1.5.3 shall apply

1. Otherwise, the Bureau shall request the administration proposing the modification to the digital Plan to take appropriate action. The proposed modification shall lapse if the administration does not modify within 30 days the characteristics so that they comply with Section II of Annex
2. This 30-day period starts on the date of the dispatch of the Bureau's request.4.1.2.8 On receipt of the complete information referred to in §4.1.2.5

§4

.1.2.6, as appropriate, the Bureau shall, within 40 days:

1. a)identify the administrations considered to be affected, in accordance with § 4.1.2.2 and §4.1.2.3;
2. b)publish the characteristics received in the Special Section of the BR IFIC, together with the names of the administrations identified, indicating those whose agreement has been communicated under § 4.1.2.5 by the administration proposing to modify the Plans, if appropriate, and the corresponding assignments to the other primary terrestrial services which are considered to be affected, if appropriate;
3. c)inform the administrations identified in
4. a)above.4.1.2.9 An administration whose agreement has been communicated to the Bureau under §4.1.2.5, may, within 40 days from the date of the publication of the BRIFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b), request the Bureau to remove its name from the list of administrations having given their agreement, as published under § 4.1.2.8 b). A copy of this request shall be sent by the Bureau to the administration proposing to modify the Plans. In the case of the removal of the name of an administration from the list of administrations having given their agreement, as published under §4.1.2.8 6), the Bureau shall consider that the agreement with that administration has not been obtained._______________________5 In the case of assignments stemming from an allotment in the digital Plan which bears remarks in the "remarks" columns of the Plan, these remarks shall be extended to these assignments.4.1.3 Request for inclusion in the agreement-seeking process4.1.3.1 Any administration which considers that it should have been included in the list of administrations considered to be affected may, within 40 days from the date of publication of the BRIFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b), request the Bureau to include its name in the list of administrations considered to be affected, giving its reasons for doing so based on criteria in Section I of Annex 4.4.1.3.2 On receipt of this request, the Bureau shall examine the matter and, if in accordance with § 4.1.2.2 and § 4.1.2.3, it finds that the name of the administration should have been included in the list of administrations considered to be affected, it shall:inform immediately the administration proposing to modify the Plans and the administration requesting to be included in the list of administrations considered to be affected; andpublish, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the request, the name of the administration in an addendum to the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b), and the corresponding assignments to other primary terrestrial services, if appropriate.For the administration whose name has been published in the addendum, the overall period of 75 days specified in § 4.1.4.6, 4.1.4.7, 4.1.4.8, 4.1.4.9, 4.1.4.10 and 4.1.5.1 shall be counted from the date of publication of the addendum to the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to above.If the Bureau finds that the name of the administration should not be included in the list of administrations considered to be affected, it shall inform this administration.4.1.3.3 The administration proposing to modify the Plans shall seek the agreement of the administrations whose agreement has not been obtained (see also § 4.1.2.9) and which are listed in the publication referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate, by applying the procedure contained in § 4.1.4 below.4.1.3.4 If all agreements have been received and no administration's name is removed under §4.1.2.9 and no administration's name is included under §4.1.3.2, the procedure contained in § 4.1.5.3 applies.4.1.4 Seeking agreement of the administrations which are considered to be affected and whose agreement has yet to be obtained4.1.4.1 The Special Section of the BRIFIC referred to in §4.1.2.8 6;

§4

.1.3.2, as appropriate, constitutes the formal request for coordination addressed to those administrations whose agreement has yet to be obtained.4.1.4.2 When seeking the agreement of another administration, the administration proposing to modify the Plans may also communicate any additional information relating to proposed criteria to be used as well as other details concerning the terrain data, particular propagation conditions, etc.4.1.4.3 On receipt of the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate, any administration listed therein shall examine the effect of the proposed modification to the digital Plan

to the analogue Plan on its broadcasting service and on its assignments to other primaiy terrestrial services, taking into account, as far as possible, the additional information referred to in § 4.1.4.2.4.1.4.4 An administration from which agreement is sought may request the Bureau to assist by providing further information to enable the administration to assess the interference from the proposed modification, using the method described in Section I of Annex 4. The Bureau shall send this information by the most expeditious means.4.1.4.5 An administration from which agreement is sought may send its comments to the administration proposing the modification to the Plans either directly

through the Bureau. In any event, the Bureau shall be informed of these comments.AAA.6 An administration which is not in a position to give its agreement to the proposed modification with respect to its broadcasting service shall give its decision, with reasons related to its broadcasting service, within 75 days from the date of publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate.4.1.4.7 An administration which is not in a position to give its agreement to the proposed modification with respect to its other primary terrestrial services shall give its reasons, based on its own assignments as referred to in § 4.1.2.3 a) and b), within 75 days from the date of publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate.4.1.4.8 Fifty days after publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate, the Bureau shall request any administration which has not yet given its decision on the matter to do so. After an overall period of 75 days following the date of publication of the BR IFIC, the Bureau shall immediately inform the administration proposing the modification to the Plans that it has sent out the aforementioned requests and provide it with the names of the administrations which have given their agreement and the name of the administrations which have not replied.4.1.4.9 When an administration has not replied within this 75-day period, it is deemed that this administration has not agreed to the proposed modification to the Plans, unless the provisions of § 4.1.4.10 and § 4.1.4.11 are applied.4.1.4.10 After this 75-day period, the administration proposing to modify the Plans may request the Bureau to assist by sending a reminder to the administration which has not replied, requesting a decision. This request shall in no way extend the 24-month period mentioned in § 4.1.5.1.4.1.4.11 If no decision is communicated to the Bureau within 40 days after the date of dispatch of the reminder under § 4.1.4.10, it shall be deemed that the administration which has not given a decision has agreed to the proposed modification to the Plans.4.1.4.12 If, at the end of the periods mentioned in §4.1.4.9

§4

.1.4.11 above, there is continuing disagreement, the Bureau shall conduct any study that may be requested by either the administration proposing the modification to the Plans

administrations from which agreement is sought; within 40 days, it shall inform them of the result of the study and shall make such recommendations as it may be able to offer for the solution of the problem.4.1.4.13 An administration may, before applying the procedures in § 4.1,

at any stage during application of the procedure described therein, request the assistance of the Bureau without this having any implication on the application of the above-mentioned periods.4.1.4.14 If, in seeking agreement, an administration modifies its initial proposal, it shall again apply the provisions of § 4.1.4.1.5 Completion of the modification procedure4.1.5.1 When an administration has obtained the agreement of all the administrations whose names were published in the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.1.2.8 b)

§ 4

.1.3.2, as appropriate, it shall inform the Bureau of the final agreed characteristics of the assignment/allotment together with the names of the administrations with which agreement has been reached. If the administration proposing the modification to the Plans does not inform the Bureau within 24 months after the 75-day period referred to in § 4.1.4.6 to § 4.1.4.10, the proposed modification shall lapse.4.1.5.2 If the above-mentioned final agreed characteristics result in the identification of new affected administrations, the administration proposing the modification to the Plans shall again apply the provisions of § 4.1 with respect to these new administrations.4.1.5.3 From the receipt of the complete information referred to in § 4.1.5.1, the Bureau shall, within 30 days, publish in the Special Section of the BR IFIC the characteristics of the assignment/allotment together with the names of the administrations which have agreed to the proposed modification to the Plans and include the new

modified assignment/allotment in the Plans, as appropriate. With respect to Contracting Members, the assignment/allotment concerned shall enjoy the same status as those appearing in the Plans. However, in the case of an assignment in the Plan resulting from the conversion of an allotment, this assignment shall remain in accordance with the allotment from which it stems and in conformity with Section II of Annex 4.4.1.5.4 The agreement of the administration(s) affected may also be obtained in accordance with this Article for a specific period of time. The assignment

allotment, as appropriate, shall be removed from the Plans and/

from the MIFR, as appropriate, by the Bureau at the end of this period of time, after it has informed the administration.4.1.6 Cancellation of an assignment

an allotmentWhen an assignment

an allotment in the Plans is cancelled either under § 4.1.1 d)

§ 4

.1.5.4, the Bureau shall publish this information in a Special Section of the BR IFIC.In the case of the cancellation of an allotment, the Bureau shall cancel all assignments stemming from this allotment from the digital Plan and from the MIFR after having informed the administration.4.1.7 Updating of the PlansThe Bureau shall maintain and publish periodically an up-to-date master copy of the Plans, taking account of any changes, additions and deletions made in accordance with the procedure of this Article.4.2 Coordination of assignments to other primary terrestrial services with the broadcasting service4.2.1 When an administration proposes to change the characteristics of an existing assignment to other primary terrestrial services,

to bring into use a new assignment to other primaiy terrestrial services, the procedure contained in this Article shall be applied before any notification is made under the provisions of Article 5.4.2.2 Initiation of the coordination procedure4.2.2.1 In application of § 4.2.1, an administration shall seek the agreement of any other administration whose broadcasting service is considered to be affected.4.2.2.2 An administration is considered to be affected in respect of its broadcasting service when the limits given in Section I of Annex 4 are exceeded.4.2.2.3 The agreement referred to in § 4.2.2.1 is not required if:a) none of the corresponding limits in Section I of Annex 4 referred to in § 4.2.2.2 are exceeded;

b) the proposed modification relates to changes in the technical characteristics which do not increase the existing level of interference and do not increase the existing level of protection required.4.2.2.4 An administration proposing a new

modified assignment shall communicate to the Bureau the relevant characteristics listed in Annex 3, in electronic form, and shall also indicate, if appropriate, the names of any administrations which have already agreed to the proposed new

modified assignment on the basis of the characteristics communicated to the Bureau.This communication shall also be considered by the Bureau, if so requested, as a request to apply the procedure contained in § 4.2.5.3 in the following cases:no agreements are required under § 4.2.2.3 and no administration's name is included under § 4.2.3.2;

all agreements have been received and no administration's name is removed under § 4.2.2.7

included under § 4.2.3.2.4.2.2.5 If the characteristics submitted under § 4.2.2.4 are found to be incomplete, the Bureau shall immediately seek from this administration any clarification required and the information not provided.4.2.2.6 On receipt of the complete information referred to in § 4.2.2.4

§ 4

.2.2.5, as appropriate, the Bureau shall, within 40 days:

1. a)identify the administrations considered to be affected, in accordance with § 4.2.2.2;
2. b)publish the characteristics received in the Special Section of the BR IFIC, together with the names of the administrations identified, indicating those whose agreement has been communicated under § 4.2.2.4 by the administration seeking the agreement;
3. c)inform the administrations identified in
4. a)above.4.2.2.7 An administration whose agreement has been communicated to the Bureau under § 4.2.2.4 may, within 40 days from the date of the publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b), request the Bureau to remove its name from the list of administrations having given their agreement, as published under § 4.2.2.6 b). A copy of this request shall be sent by the Bureau to the administration seeking the agreement. In the case of the removal of a name of an administration from the list of administrations having given their agreement, as published under § 4.2.2.6 b), the Bureau shall consider that the agreement with that administration has not been obtained.4.2.3 Request for inclusion in the agreement-seeking process4.2.3.1 Any administration which considers that it should have been included in the list of administrations considered to be affected may, within 40 days from the date of publication of the BR IFIC, request the Bureau to include its name in the list of administrations considered to be affected, giving its reasons for doing so based on criteria in Section I of Annex 4.4.2.3.2 On receipt of this request, the Bureau shall examine the matter and, if in accordance with § 4.2.2.2, it finds that the name of the administration should have been included in the list of administrations considered to be affected, it shall:inform immediately the administration seeking the agreement and the administration requesting to be included in the list of administrations considered to be affected; andpublish, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the request, the name of the administration in an addendum to the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b).For the administration whose name has been published in the addendum, the overall period of 75 days specified in § 4.2.4.6, 4.2.4.7, 4.2.4.8, 4.2.4.9 and 4.2.5.1 shall be counted from the date of publication of the addendum to the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to above.If the Bureau finds that the name of the administration should not be included in the list of administrations considered to be affected, it shall inform this administration.4.2.3.3 The administration proposing the new

modified assignment shall seek the agreement of the administrations whose agreement has not been obtained (see also § 4.2.2.7) and which are listed in the publication referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§ 4

.2.3.2, as appropriate, by applying the procedure contained in § 4.2.4 below.4.2.3.4 If all agreements have been received and no administration's name is removed under § 4.2.2.7 and no administration's name is included under § 4.2.3.2, the procedure contained in § 4.2.5.3 applies.4.2.4 Seeking agreement of the administrations which are considered to be affected and whose agreement has yet to be obtained4.2.4.1 The Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§4

.2.3.2, as appropriate, constitutes the formal request for coordination addressed to those administrations whose agreement has yet to be obtained.4.2.4.2 When seeking the agreement of another administration, the administration proposing the new

modified assignment may also communicate any additional information relating to proposed criteria to be used as well as other details concerning the terrain data, particular propagation conditions, etc.4.2.4.3 On receipt of the Special Section of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§ 4

.2.3.2, as appropriate, any administration listed therein shall examine the effect of the proposed new

modified assignment on its broadcasting service, taking into account, as far as possible, the additional information referred to in § 4.2.4.2.4.2.4.4 An administration from which agreement is sought may request the Bureau to assist by providing further information to enable the administration to assess the interference from the proposed new

modified assignment, using the method described in Section I of Annex 4. The Bureau shall send this information by the most expeditious means.4.2.4.5 An administration from which agreement is sought may send its comments to the administration proposing the new

modified assignment, either directly

through the Bureau. In any event, the Bureau shall be informed of these comments.4.2.4.6 An administration which is not in a position to give its agreement to the proposed new

modified assignment shall give its decision, with reasons related to its broadcasting service, within 75 days from the date of publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§ 4

.2.3.2, as appropriate.4.2.4.7 Fifty days after publication of the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§ 4

.2.3.2, as appropriate, the Bureau shall request any administration which has not yet given its decision on the matter to do so. After an overall period of 75 days following the date of publication of the BR IFIC, the Bureau shall immediately inform the administration proposing the new

modified assignment that it has sent out the aforementioned requests and provide it with the names of the administrations which have given their agreement and the name of the administrations which have not replied.4.2.4.8 When an administration has not replied within this 75-day period, it is deemed that this administration has not agreed to the proposed new

modified assignment, unless the provisions of § 4.2.4.9 and § 4.2.4.10 are applied.4.2.4.9 After the 75-day period, the administration proposing the new

modified assignment may request the Bureau to assist by sending a reminder to the administration which has not replied, requesting a decision. This request shall in no way extend the 24-month period mentioned in§4.2.5.1.4.2.4.10 If no decision is communicated to the Bureau within 40 days after the date of dispatch of the reminder under § 4.2.4.9, it shall be deemed that the administration which has not given a decision has agreed to the proposed new

modified assignment.4.2.4.11 If, at the end of the periods mentioned in §4.2.4.8

§4

.2.4.10 above, there is continuing disagreement, the Bureau shall conduct any study that may be requested by either the administration proposing the new

modified assignment

administrations from which agreement is sought; within 40 days, it shall inform them of the result of the study and shall make such recommendations as it may be able to offer for the solution of the problem.4.2.4.12 An administration may, before applying the procedures in § 4.2,

at any stage during application of the procedure described therein, request the assistance of the Bureau without this having any implication on the application of the above-mentioned periods.4.2.4.13 If, in seeking agreement, an administration modifies its initial proposal, it shall again apply the provisions of § 4.2.4.2.5 Completion of the coordination procedure4.2.5.1 When an administration has obtained the agreement of all the administrations whose names were published in the BR IFIC referred to in § 4.2.2.6 b)

§ 4

.2.3.2, as appropriate, it shall inform the Bureau of the final agreed characteristics of the assignment together with the names of the administrations with which agreement has been reached. If the administration proposing the new

modified assignment does not inform the Bureau within 24 months after the 75-day period referred to in § 4.2.4.6 to 4.2.4.9, the proposed modification shall lapse.4.2.5.2 If the above-mentioned final agreed characteristics result in the identification of new affected administrations, the administration proposing the new

modified assignment shall again apply the provisions of § 4.2 with respect to these new administrations.4.2.5.3 From the receipt of the complete information referred to in § 4.2.5.1, the Bureau shall, within 30 days, publish in the Special Section of the BR IFIC the characteristics of the assignment together with the names of the administrations which have agreed to the proposed new

modified assignment and include the new

modified assignment in the List.4.2.5.4 The proposed new

modified assignment shall lapse if it is not notified under Article 5 within 12 months after the publication referred to in § 4.2.5.3.4.2.5.5 The agreement of the administration(s) affected may also be obtained in accordance with this Article for a specific period of time. The assignment shall be removed from the List and/

from the MIFR, as appropriate, by the Bureau at the end of this period of time, after it has informed the administration.4.2.6 Updating of the ListThe Bureau shall maintain and publish periodically an up-to-date master copy of the List, taking account of any changes, additions and deletions made in accordance with the procedure of this Article.ARTICLE 5Notification of frequency assignments5.1 Notification of frequency assignments to broadcasting stations5.1.1 When an administration proposes to bring into use an assignment to a broadcasting station, it shall notify to the Bureau, in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of the Radio Regulations, the characteristics of this assignment, as specified in Annex 3 of the Agreement.5.1.2 Under the examination by the Bureau of the assignment with respect to No. 11.34 of the Radio Regulations, i.e. its conformity with the Plans and the associated provisions, the finding shall be favourable if:a) the assignment is contained in the Plans6 and not bearing any remark with respect to assignments in the analogue Plan, to existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services

to entries in the digital Plan, and the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met;

b) the assignment is contained in the digital Plan and bearing a remark with respect to:assignments in the analogue Plan

to existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services, and all the necessary agreements have been obtained, and the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met; and/

entries in the digital Plan, and the notifying administration states that all conditions associated with the remark are fully met, and the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met;

c) in the case of an assignment stemming from an allotment in the digital Plan, which does not bear any remark with respect to assignments in the analogue Plan, to existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services,

to entries in the digital Plan, the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met;

d) in the case of an assignment stemming from an allotment in the digital Plan, which bears a remark with respect to:assignments in the analogue Plan

to existing assignments to other primary terrestrial services, all the necessary agreements have been obtained and the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met; and/

entries in the digital Plan, the conditions of Section II of Annex 4 are met and the notifying administration states that all conditions associated with the remark are fully met;

e) in the case of the use of an entry in the digital Plan, with different characteristics, within the DVB-T

T-DAB systems, the conditions specified in Section II of Annex 4 aremet.5.1.3 A digital entry in the Plan may also be notified with characteristics different from those appearing in the Plan, for transmissions in the broadcasting service

in other primary terrestrial services operating in conformity with the Radio Regulations, provided that the peak power density in any 4 kHz of the above-mentioned notified assignments shall not exceed the spectral power density in the same 4 kHz of the digital entry in the Plan. Such use shall not claim more protection than that afforded to the above-mentioned digital entry.5.1.4 If the examination referred to in § 5.1.2, and § 5.1.3 where appropriate, leads to a favourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded in the MIFR. In relations between Contracting Members, all broadcasting frequency assignments recorded in the MIFR and in conformity with the Agreement shall be considered to have the same status irrespective of the date of receipt of the notices by the Bureau for such frequency assignments

of the date on which they are brought into service.5.1.5 If the examination referred to in §5.1.2

§5

.1.3, as appropriate, leads to an unfavourable finding, the notice shall be returned to the notifying administration with the reasons therefor.5.1.6 If the administration resubmits the notice and the re-examination by the Bureau under §5.1.2, and §5.1.3 where appropriate, leads to a favourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded in the MIFR.5.1.7 If the re-examination under § 5.1.2 leads to an unfavourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded with a favourable finding under No. 11.31, and with an unfavourable finding under No. 11.34 together with the name(

1. s)of the administration(
2. s)with which there is continuing disagreement, indicating that with respect to this (these) administration(
3. s)the recorded assignment shall be operated under the conditions of not causing unacceptable interference to, and not claiming protection from, any station operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans.5.1.8 The notice for resubmission shall also include a signed commitment by the notifying administration, indicating that use of an assignment submitted for recording in the MIFR under § 5.1.7 shall not cause unacceptable interference to, nor claim protection from, any station of the administration with which there is continuing disagreement operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans and recorded in the MIFR with a favourable finding with respect to Nos. 11.31 and 11.34.5.1.9 Should unacceptable interference be caused by the use of this assignment to any assignment of the administration with which there is continuing disagreement operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans and recorded in the MIFR with a favourable finding with respect to Nos. 11.31 and 11.34, the administration causing unacceptable interference shall, upon receipt of advice thereof, immediately eliminate this interference.5.2 Notification of frequency assignments to other primary terrestrial services5.2.1 When an administration proposes to bring into use an assignment to other primary terrestrial services, it shall notify the assignment to the Bureau in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of the Radio Regulations.5.2.2 Under the examination by the Bureau of conformity with the Agreement, the Bureau shall examine the notice with respect to the successful application of the procedure contained in § 4.2 of the Agreement.5.2.3 If the examination referred to in § 5.2.2 above leads to a favourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded in the MIFR. Otherwise, the notice shall be returned to the notifying administration with the reasons therefor.5.2.4 If the administration resubmits the notice and the re-examination by the Bureau under § 5.2.2 above leads to a favourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded in the MIFR accordingly.5.2.5 If the re-examination under § 5.2.2 leads to an unfavourable finding, the assignment shall be recorded with a favourable finding under No. 11.31, and with an unfavourable finding under No. 11.34 together with the name(
4. s)of the administration(
5. s)with which there is continuing disagreement, indicating that with respect to this (these) administration(
6. s)the recorded assignment shall be operated under the conditions of not causing unacceptable interference to, and not claiming protection from, any station operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans.5.2.6 The notice for resubmission shall also include a signed commitment by the notifying administration, indicating that use of an assignment recorded in the MIFR under § 5.2.5 shall not cause unacceptable interference to, nor claim protection from, any station of the administration with which there is continuing disagreement operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans and recorded in the MIFR with a favourable finding with respect to Nos. 11.31 and 11.34.5.2.7 Should unacceptable interference be caused by the use of this assignment to any assignment of the administration with which there is continuing disagreement operating in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans and recorded in the MIFR with a favourable finding with respect to Nos. 11.31 and 11.34, the administration causing unacceptable interference shall, upon receipt of advice thereof, immediately eliminate this interference.ARTICLE 6Settlement of disputes6.1 If, after application of the procedure described in the above articles, the administrationsconcerned have been unable to reach agreement, they may resort to the procedure described in Article 56 of the Constitution. They may also agree to apply the Optional Protocol on the compulsory settlement of disputes relating to the ITU Constitution, the ITU Convention and to the Administrative Regulations.ARTICLE 7Accession to the Agreement7.1 Any Member State in the Planning Area which has not signed the Agreement may at any time deposit an instrument of accession with the Secretary-General, who shall immediately inform the other Member States. Accession to the Agreement shall be made without reservations and shall apply to the Plans as they stand at the time of accession.7.2 Accession to the Agreement shall become effective on the date on which the instrument of accession is received by the Secretary-General.ARTICLE 8Scope of application of the Agreement8.1 The Agreement shall bind Contracting Members in their relations with one another but shall not bind those members in their relations with non-contracting members.8.2 If a Contracting Member enters reservations with regard to the application of any provision of the Agreement, other Contracting Members shall be free to disregard such provision in their relations with the member which has made such reservations.ARTICLE 9Approval of the Agreement9.1 Member States signatories to the Agreement shall notify their approval of thisAgreement, as promptly as possible, to the Secretary-General, who shall at once inform the other Member States.ARTICLE 10Denunciation of the Agreement10.1 Any Contracting Member may denounce the Agreement at any time by a notification sent to the Secretaiy-General, who shall inform the other Member States.10.2 Denunciation shall become effective one year after the date on which the Secretary-General receives the notification of denunciation.10.3 On the date on which the denunciation becomes effective, the Bureau shall delete from the Plans the assignments and/

the allotments entered in the name of the Member State which has denounced the Agreement.ARTICLE 11Revision of the Agreement11.1 No revision of the Agreement shall be undertaken except by a competent regionalradiocommunication conference convened in accordance with the procedure laid down in the Constitution and Convention, to which all the Member States in the Planning Area shall be invited.ARTICLE 12Entry into force, duration and provisional application of the Agreement12.1 The Agreement shall enter into force on 17 June 2007 at 0001 hours UTC.12.2 The provisions of the Agreement shall be provisionally applicable as of 17 June 2006 at 0001 hours UTC.12.3 As from the date mentioned in § 12.2 above, broadcasting stations in operation with frequency assignments which do not appear in the Plans

which are not in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans (see § 5.1.2 of Article 5) may continue to be operated under the conditions of not causing unacceptable interference to, and not claiming protection from, any assignments in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans.12.4 The Agreement shall remain in force until it is revised in accordance with Article 11 of the Agreement.12.5 The Transition period shall commence on 17 June 2006 at 0001 hours UTC. During the Transition period, assignments in the analogue Plan (as specified in § 3.1.2 of Article 3) shall be protected.12.6 The Transition period shall end on 17 June 2015 at 0001 hours UTC. However, for the countries listed in footnote below7, for the band 174-230 MHz8, the Transition period shall end on 17 June 2020 at 0001 hours UTC. After the end of the applicable Transition period, the corresponding entries in the analogue Plan shall be cancelled by the Bureau, andthe provisions of § 4.1 of Article 4 referring to the modification of the analogue Plan; and- remarks with respect to analogue assignmentsshall cease to apply to the analogue assignments in the corresponding countries.12.7 After the end of the above-mentioned Transition period, the Bureau shall review thestatus of the assignments which were contained in the analogue Plan and recorded in the MIFR andinvite the administrations to cancel the corresponding entries in the MIFR.12.8 Following the action of the Bureau under § 12.7 above, administrations may request theBureau to cancel the corresponding assignments,

continue to operate them, under the conditions that these analogue assignments:a) were contained in the Plan and already brought into use, andb) shall not cause unacceptable interference to, and shall not claim protection from, any assignments in conformity with the Agreement and its associated Plans (see § 5.1.2 of Article 5).______________________6 This provision shall not be applicable to the analogue Plan after the end of the Transition period.7 List of the countries: Algeria (People's Democratic Republic of), Burkina Faso, Cameroon (Republic of), Congo (Republic of the), Cote d'lvoire (Republic of), Egypt (Arab Republic of), Gabonese Republic, Ghana, Guinea (Republic of), Iran (Islamic Republic of), Jordan (Hashemite Kingdom of), Mali (Republic of), Morocco (Kingdom of), Mauritania (Islamic Republic of), Nigeria (Federal Republic of), Syrian Arab Republic, Sudan (Republic of the), Chad (Republic of), Togolese Republic, Tunisia, Yemen (Republic of).For the following administrations which were not present at RRC-06, namely Benin (Republic of), Central African Republic, Eritrea, Ethiopia (Federal Democratic Republic of), Guinea-Bissau (Republic of), Equatorial Guinea (Republic of), Liberia (Republic of), Madagascar (Republic of), Niger (Republic of the), Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sao Tome and Principe (Democratic Republic of), Sierra Leone and Somali Democratic Republic, the date of the end of the transition period in the VHF band (174-230 MHz) is 17 June 2020 at 0001 hours UTC, unless any of the aforementioned administrations communicates to the Bureau during the 90-day period from the end of RRC-06 that it selects 17 June 2015 at 0001 hours UTC.8 170-230 MHz for Morocco.12.9 The Bureau shall update the MIFR accordingly.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the delegātes of the Member States of the International Telecommunication Union from the Planning Area, named below have, on behalf of their respective competent authorities, signed one copy of these Final Acts. In case of disputē, the French text shall prevail. This copy shall remain deposited in the archives of the Union. The Secretary-General shall forward one certified true copy to each Member State of the International Telecommunication Union from the Planning AreaDone at Geneva, 16 June 2006 For the Republic of Albania:Hydajet KOPANIFor the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria:A. El Kader IBRIRMohamed MADOURSlimane DJEMATENEA. El Malek HOUYOUFor the Federal Republic of Germany:Gerold REICHLEFor the Principality of Andorra:Xavier JIMENEZ-BELTRANFor the Republic of Angola:Domingos Carlos OLIVEIRAOctavio Domingos MACHADOFor the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia:Habeeb K. AL-SHANKITIRiyadh K. NAJMSulaiman AL-SAMNANSaud AL-RASHEEDTariq M. AL-AMRIWesam A. SHEIKHFor the Republic of Armenia:Ashot VERDYANFor Austria:Franz PRULLPeter REINDLFor Azerbaijani Republic:Gulām ABDULLAYEVFor the Kingdom of Bahrain:A.S. AL-THAWADIHesham K. AL-BINKHALILFor the Republic of Belarus:Vladimir TESLYUKFor Belgium:Freddy BAERTSēverine DYONPatrick VAN DER GRACHTFor Bosnia and Herzegovina:Jadranka KALMETAFor the Republic of Botswana:Cuthbert M. LEKAUKAUTshoganetso KEPALETSWEKingsley REETSANGBoipuso KOBEDIThapelo MARUPINGBathopi LUKEFor the Republic of Bulgaria:Dimitar STANTCHEVBozhidar KOZHUHAZOVSvilen POPOVGeorgi KOLEVFor Burkina Faso:Souleimane ZABREIssa C. Ignace SIMPOREFor the Republic of Burundi:Joseph NSEGANAFor the Republic of Cameroon:Guillaume Paul MOUTEEl Hadjar ABDOURAMANEHilaire MBEGABoniface TAKOUAvvallou MOUHAMADOUMue Desire NDONGOFor the Republic of Cape VerdeDavid GOMESAna Cristina Monteiro LIMAFor the Republic of Cyprus:Andronikos KAKKOURASFor the Vatican City State:Costantino PACIFIC!Giudici PIERVINCENZOFor the Republic of the Congo:M. AKOUALAJean MAKOUNDOUFor the Republic of Cote d'lvoire:Claude DASSYS BEKEJean-Baptiste YAO KOUAKOUAlexis KOFFI KOUMANSimon KOFFIAffou AKAFFOUFor the Republic of Croatia:Drazen BREGLECKreso ANTONOVICZeljko TABAKOVICGasper GACINAFor Denmark:Jorgen Lang NIELSENPeter Marlau KNUDSENHenning ANDERSENFor the Republic of Djibouti:Mourad Hassan BOGOREHFor the Arab Republic of Egypt:Laila Hussein HAMDALLAHEsmail ELGHUTTANYFor the United Arab Emirates:Tariq A. AL-AWADHI Naser AL-RASHEDIMustafa Hamouda ISHAGFor Spain:Antonio FERNANDEZ-PANIAGUAJose Ramon CAMBLORFor the Republic of Estonia:Arvo RAMMUSFor the Federation of Russia:Andrey BESKOROVAYNYVictor STRELETSFor Finland:Kirsi KARLAMAAKari KANGASFor France:Arnaud MIQUELFrancois RANCYDominique Jean ROLFOFor the Gabonese Republic:Jacques EDANE NKWELEWilliam MOUNGALAFirmin NGOYE Francis IMOUNGAJules LEGNONGOJean-Jacques MASSIMA LANDJIFor the Republic of Gambia:Famara DAMPHABai Baboucar SAN YANGFor Georgia:Mikheil GOTOSHIAFor Ghana:Emmanuel OWUSU-ADANSIFor Greece:Nissim BENMAYORGeorge DROSSOSFor the Republic of Guinea:Abdoul Aziz BARRYIbrahima Kenda SOUAREHabib TALLFor the Republic of Hungary:Erzsebet BANKUTIPeter VARIFor the Islamic Republic of Iran:Mahmoud KHOSRAVIAbdolali ALIASKARITaghi SHAFIEEHossein ABEDIANFor the Republic of Iraq:Wesall A. ALIFor Ireland:John A.C. BREENRory A.J. HINCHYNeil O'BRIENAlexander KRASNOJENFor the State of Israel:Haim MAZARFor Italy:Francesco TROISIMario TAGIULLORiccardo DE LEONARDISDonato MARGARELLAFor the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan:M. AL-WATHIQ SHAQRAHFor the Republic of Kazakhstan:Rizat NURSHABEKOVFor the Republic of Kenya:Stanley K. KIBELeo K. BORUETTDaniel O. OBAMSamwel O. OT1ENOAlfred M. AMBANIFor the State of Kuwait:Nashi AL QAHTANIYousef AL-SAADFor the Kingdom of Lesotho:Sello LEJAKANETlali MANOSAFor the Republic of Latvia:Inars JEKABSONSJuris VALENIEKSJuris RENCISFor the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia:Mile VELJANOVFor Lebanon:Maurice GHAZALFor the Principality of Liechtenstein:Kurt BtJHLERFor the Republic of Lithuania:V. KISONASM. ZILINSKASFor Luxembourg:Roland THURMESFor Malawi:Mike KUNTIYAWillis D. LIPANDELloyd MOMBAFor the Republic of Mali:Sekou COULIBALYNouhoum TRAOREBangaly-Fode TRAORELB. MAIGAA.A.M. CISSEMohamed AG HAMATIAmadou DIAOFor Malta:Saviour F. BORGJoseph SPITERIAdrian GALEAFor the Kingdom of Morocco:Mohammed LOULICHKIMohammed HAMMOUDAMustapha BESSIMohamed Mamoun SBAYAbderrahim KHAFAJINabila EL MERNISSIAdil ARAMJAFor the Islamic Republic of Mauritania:Mohamed Vadel OULD TABOUFor the Republic of Moldova:Andrei NEMTANUTeodor CICLICCIEughenii SESTACOVFor the Principality of Monaco:Carole LANTERIFor the Republic of Mozambique:Hilario Lourino TAMELEMartins S. LANGAFor the Republic of Namibia:Barthos HARA-GAEBFor the Republic of Niger:Abdou SALOUFor the Federal Republic of Nigeria:Abayomi BOLARINWAEdward Idris AMANAAdamu ABDUMuhammed UMARUFor Norway:Geir Jan SUNDALFor the Sultanate of Oman:YousufALBALUSHIFor the Republic of Uganda:Jack TURYAMWIJUKAJonas M. BANTULAKIFor the Republic of Uzbekistan:M. KHALMURATOVAFor the Kingdom of Netherlands:Bart SCHAAP A. VAN DIJKENBen SMITHFor the Republic of Poland:Krystyna ROSLAN-KUHNPawel KACKIDariusz WIECEKArkadiusz KUREKRadoslaw TYNIOWFor Portugal:Maria F. SANTOS SILVA GIRAOMiguel J. DA COSTA M. HENRIQUESFor the State of Qatar:Yousuf A. AL-KUBAISIFor the Syrian Arab Republic:Moustafa AJENEH Mohammad HASANAdnan SALHABFor the Kyrgyz Republic:Baiysh NURMATOVFor the Slovak Republic:Milan LUKNARFor the Czech Republic:Pavel DVORAKFor Romania:Florin BEJANCatalin M. MARINESCUFor the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:Michael GODDARDMalcolm JOHNSONFor the Republic of Rwanda:Abraham MAKUZACharles NAHAYODidier RUBAYIZA KAYITANAFor the Republic of San Marino:Michele GIRIFor the Republic of Senegal:Makhtar FALLMamadou FATYFor the Republic of Serbia:Dragana CURCICSlavenko RASAJSKIPetar STEFANOVICMarija RAICKOVICNatalija VARAGICFor the Republic of Slovenia:Matjaz JANSAMihael KRISELJIgor FUNAFranc KOVACICFor the Republic of the Soudan:Mohamed ABD ELMAGIDFor the Republic of South Africa:Nomacamasu Ingrid PONIFor Sweden:Anders FREDERICHPer KJELLINPercy PETTERSSONFor the Confederation of Switzerland:Peter B. PAULIFor the Kingdom of Swaziland:Austin M. MGABHIFor the Republic of Tajikistan:S. DUDARAUFor the United Republic of Tanzania:J.S. NKOMAJ.S. KILONGOLAN. Habbi GUNYEA.J. KISAKAJohannes A.K. MAGESAT.A. USIAli H. AyubFor the Republic of Chad:Guirdona MOGALBAYEAli Idriss AHMEDFor the Togolese Republic:Massina PALOUKI Gaba S. MAWOUKOLalle KANAKEFor Tunisia:Mohammed BONGUILilia SOUSSIMohsen GHOMMAN MFor Turkey:Tayfun ACARERAli ZORErkan CANFor Ukraine:Vasyl HANDABURAOlena ULASENKOFor the Republic of Yemen:Mohamed Ali AL-AZZANIFor the Republic of Zambia:Kephas MASIYEKezias MWALEFor the Republic of Zimbabwe:Obert MUGANYURAMatthias CHAKANYUKA