Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)417
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Mehmet Demir against Türkiye
 
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 December 2024
at the 1515th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
 
 Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
55569/19
MEHMET DEMİR
24/10/2023
24/10/2023
 
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
 
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation of Article 8 established on account of unforeseeable monitoring by the prison authorities of documents exchanged between the applicant and his lawyer;
 
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
 
-          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
-          of general measures preventing similar violations;
 
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
 
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to execute the judgment and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in this (see document DH-DD(2024)752);
 
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicant has been released from the prison;
 
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Demirtaş and Yüksekdağ Şenoğlu (10207/21) group of cases also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
 
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case;
 
CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have been adopted;
 
DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures in the framework of the Demirtaş and Yüksekdağ Şenoğlu group (10207/21);
 
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.