Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)36
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Sevinç against Türkiye
 
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 March 2025
at the 1521st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
 
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
57878/10
SEVİNÇ
24/03/2020
24/03/2020
 
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
 
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violations established on account of unjustified conviction of the applicant for having expressed opinions;
 
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
 
-          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
-          of general measures preventing similar violations;
 
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
 
Having examined the action report provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)44);
 
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicant has not requested the reopening of the proceedings in this case;
 
Considering that the question of general measures was resolved, given that the military courts, practice of which was the crux of the violation in this case, were abolished, and that a Convention-compliant practice has been developed by the civilian courts in application of Article 85 of the Military Penal Code;
 
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
 
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and
 
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.