Published on 7 April 2025
 
FOURTH SECTION
Application no. 13277/23
Tamar MTCHEDLISHVILI
against Georgia
lodged on 21 March 2023
communicated on 17 March 2025
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns the alleged non-enforcement of a decision awarding the applicant costs and expenses in relation to the civil-law proceedings initiated by her. The Supreme Court’s final decision, which upheld the award, was adopted on 4 June 2021. The applicant claimed that, to date, the domestic courts have not issued a writ of enforcement necessary to initiate the enforcement proceedings.
The applicant relied on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1.  Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because the decision on the award of costs and expenses has not been enforced (see Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, § 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 196, ECHR 2006-V; and Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34 and 37, ECHR 2002-III)?
 
2.  Did the applicant have at her disposal an effective domestic remedy for her complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, as required by Article 13?