CASE OF GABRIELYAN AGAINST ARMENIA AND 4 OTHER CASES

2025-06-12T00:00:00
Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)92 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Armenia   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 June 2025 at the 1531st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 8088/05 Gabrielyan 10/04/2012 10/07/2012 3571/09 Asatryan 27/04/2017 27/07/2017 1837/10 Avagyan 22/11/2018 22/02/2019 14078/12 Dadayan 06/09/2018 06/12/2018 18550/13 Martirosyan 06/12/2018 06/12/2018   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established, concerning the right to examine evidence at trial (cross-examination of witnesses and examination of video recordings),   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and -          of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action reports provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2017)910, DH-DD(2024)841, and DH‑DD(2025)517);   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.