CASE OF STANISLAV LUTSENKO AGAINST UKRAINE (No. 2)

Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)173 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Stanislav Lutsenko (No. 2) against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 July 2025 at the 1533rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 483/10 Stanislav Lutsenko (No. 2) 15/09/2022 15/12/2022   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -          of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and -          of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)1144);   Recalling that the violation established in the present case stemmed from the specific circumstances of the unlawful application of the disciplinary sanctions by the prison authorities and that the question of general measures related to the absence of an effective remedy against imposition of sanctions by prison administration is examined within the framework of the Ivan Karpenko case (Petukhov No. 2 group of cases);   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.