MUSAVAT PARTIYASI v. AZERBAIJAN

2026-05-21T00:00:00
THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 44082/18 and 25761/24 MUSAVAT PARTIYASI against Azerbaijan (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21 May 2026 as a Committee composed of:  Diana Kovatcheva, President,  Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,  Vasilka Sancin, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDUREThe details of the applicant political party and its representative are set out in the appended table. The applicant political party’s complaints under Article 11 of the Convention concerning a prohibition on holding and a restriction on the location of peaceful assemblies were communicated to the Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”). Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention. The Court received the friendly-settlement declarations, signed by the parties, under which the applicant political party agreed to waive any further claims against Azerbaijan in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay it the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases. THE LAWHaving regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision. The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to join the applications; Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Done in English and notified in writing on 11 June 2026.    Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva  Acting Deputy Registrar President   APPENDIX List of applications raising complaints under Articles 11 and 13 of the Convention (prohibition on holding peaceful assemblies or restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events and lack of any effective domestic remedy) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of registration Representative’s name and location Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of Applicant’s declaration Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per application (in euros)[1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros)[2]    44082/18 03/09/2018  MUSAVAT PARTIYASI 1992   Nemat KARIMLI Baku 20/02/2026 07/03/2026 1,200 250    25761/24 17/08/2024 20/02/2026 07/03/2026 1,200 250   [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant political party. [2] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant political party.