Judgments of 26.11.2024

2024-11-26T00:00:00
issued by the Registrar of the Court   ECHR 274 (2024)   26.11.2024   Judgments of 26 November 2024   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing six Chamber judgments1:   three judgments are summarised below;   separate press releases have been issued for the three other judgments in the cases of Souroullas   Kay and Zannettos v. Cyprus (application no. 1618/18), Kotov v. Russia (nos. 49282/19 and   50346/19), and Ferrero Quintana v. Spain (no. 2669/19);   The judgments summarised below are available only in English.   A.P. v. Austria (application no. 1718/21)   The applicant, A.P., is an Austrian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Vienna. She is the   mother of T.P., who was born on 28 August 1997 and died on 3 August 2017.   The case concerns T.P.’s death during compulsory military service. He collapsed during a forced   march in over 30°C heat. The criminal investigation into negligent manslaughter and grossly   negligent manslaughter against the officers in charge of the training was ultimately discontinued by   prosecutors in January 2020.   Relying on Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) and 8 (right   to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights Ms A.P.   complains, in particular, of her son’s death, of a failure to protect him from inhuman treatment, and   that the subsequent investigation was flawed.   No violation of Article 2 (right to life and investigation)   NDI SOPOT S.A v. North Macedonia (no. 6035/17)   The applicant, NDI SOPOT S.A., is a construction and engineering company registered in Poland.   The case concerns the lack of recognition by the courts of North Macedonia of an arbitration award   in the applicant company’s favour by the Tribunal of the International Court of Arbitration of the   International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Paris. The dispute had been with a private company, G.,   based in North Macedonia, over the construction of a section of the A4 motorway in Poland. The   companies had agreed to allow the ICC arbitration tribunal to adjudicate in the event of a dispute.   The applicant relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention and Article 1 of   Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Violation of Article 6   Just satisfaction:   1 Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber   judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a   panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and   deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the   Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.   Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.   Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution   non-pecuniary damage: 3,600 euros (EUR)   costs and expenses: EUR 15,000   I.B.A. v. Switzerland (no. 28995/20)   The applicant, I.B.A. is a Tunisian national who was born in 1980 and lives in Switzerland.   I.B.A. arrived and settled in Switzerland in 1999 after marrying a Swiss national. They divorced in   2005, and I.B.A. married a Tunisian national, who joined him in Switzerland. They had three children,   all born in Switzerland. The case concerns an order for the applicant’s expulsion from the country for   five years following his criminal conviction for social benefit fraud.   The applicant alleges that the order for expulsion was a disproportionate measure which violated his   right to respect for family life under Article 8 of the Convention.   No violation of Article 8   This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,   judgments   and   further   information   about   the   Court   can   be   found   on   https://www.echr.coe.int/home. To receive the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here:   www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on X (Twitter) @ECHR_CEDH.   Press contacts   [email protected]e.int | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08   We are happy to receive journalists’ enquiries via either email or telephone.   Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)   Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)   Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)   Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)   Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member   States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   2