2011. évi CXXXIX. törvény a Bernben, 1980. május 9-én kelt, Nemzetközi Vasúti Fuvarozási Egyezmény (COTIF) módosításáról Vilniusban elfogadott, 1999. június 3-án kelt Jegyzőkönyv E, F és G Függelékein
§ 1may withdraw it at any time by notification to the Depositary.
This withdrawal shall take effect one month after the day on which the Depositary notifies it to the Member States. Article 3 Definitions For the purposes of these Uniform Rules, the term
- a)„railway infrastructure” means all the railway lines and fixed installations, so far as these are necessary for the circulation of railway vehicles and the safety of traffic;
- b)„manager” means the person who makes railway infrastructure available and who has responsibilities in accordance with the laws and prescriptions in force in the State in which the infrastructure is located;
- c)„carrier” means the person who carries persons or goods by rail in international traffic under the CIV Uniform Rules or the CIM Uniform Rules and who is licensed in accordance with the laws and prescriptions relating to licensing and recognition of licenses in force in the State in which the person undertakes this activity;
- d)„auxiliary” means the servants or other persons whose services the carrier or the manager makes use of for the performance of the contract when these servants or other persons are acting within the scope of their functions;
- e)„third party” means any person other than the manager, the carrier and their auxiliaries;
- f)„licence” means the authorisation issued by a State to a railway undertaking, in accordance with the laws and prescriptions in force in that State, by which its capacity as a carrier is recognized;
- g)„safety certificate” means the document attesting, in accordance with the laws and prescriptions in force in the State in which the infrastructure is located, that so far as concerns the carrier, – the internal organisation of the undertaking as well as – the personnel to be employed and the vehicles to be used on the infrastructure, meet the requirements imposed in respect of safety in order to ensure a service without danger on that infrastructure. Article 4 Mandatory law Unless provided otherwise in these Uniform Rules, any stipulation which, directly or indirectly, would derogate from these Uniform Rules, shall be null and void. The nullity of such a stipulation shall not involve the nullity of other provisions of the contract. Nevertheless, the parties to the contract may assume a liability greater and obligations more burdensome than those provided for in these Uniform Rules or fix a maximum amount of compensation for loss of or damage to property. TITLE II CONTRACT OF USE Article 5 Contents and form § 1 Relations between the manager and the carrier or any other person entitled to enter into such a contract under the laws and prescriptions in force in the State in which the infrastructure is located shall be regulated in a contract of use. § 2 The contract shall regulate the necessary details for the determination of the administrative, technical and financial conditions of use. § 3 The contract must be concluded in writing or in an equivalent form. The absence or irregularity of a written form or equivalent form of contract or the absence of one of the matters specified in § 2 shall not affect the existence or the validity of the contract which shall remain subject to these Uniform Rules. Article 5bis Law remaining unaffected § 1 The provisions of Article 5 as well as those of Articles 6, 7 and 22 shall not affect the obligations which the parties to the contract of use of infrastructure have to meet under the laws and prescriptions in force in the State in which the infrastructure is located including, where appropriate, the law of the European Community. § 2 The provisions of Articles 8 and 9 shall not affect the obligations which the parties to the contract of use of infrastructure have to meet in an EC Member State or in a State where Community legislation applies as a result of international agreements with the European Community. § 3 The provisions of §§ 1 and 2 concern in particular: – agreements to be concluded between railway undertakings or authorised applicants and infrastructure managers, – licensing, – safety certification, – insurance, – charging involving performance schemes to minimise delays and disruptions and improve the performance of the railway network, – compensation arrangements in favour of customers and – dispute resolution. Article 6 Special obligations of the carrier and the manager § 1 The carrier must be authorised to undertake the activity of a carrier by rail. The personnel to be employed and the vehicles to be used must satisfy the safety requirements. The manager may require the carrier to prove, by the presentation of a valid licence and safety certificate or certified copies, or in any other manner, that these conditions are fulfilled. § 2 The carrier must notify the manager of any event which might affect the validity of his licence, his safety certificates or other elements of proof. § 3 The manager may require the carrier to prove that he has taken out a sufficient liability insurance or taken equivalent measures to cover any claims, on whatever grounds, referred to in Articles 9 to 21. Each year, the carrier must prove, by an attestation in due form, that the liability insurance or the equivalent provisions still exist; he must notify the manager of any modification relating to them before it takes effect. § 4 The parties to the contract must inform each other of any event which might impede the execution of the contract they have concluded. Article 7 Termination of the contract § 1 The manager may rescind the contract forthwith when
- a)the carrier is no longer authorised to carry on the activity of carrier by rail;
- b)the personnel to be employed and the vehicles to be used no longer meet the safety requirements;
- c)the carrier is in arrear with payment, that is to say 1. for two successive payment periods and for an amount in excess of the equivalent of one month’s use, or 2. for a period covering more than two payment periods and for an amount equal to the value of two months’ use;
- d)the carrier is in clear breach of one of the special obligations specified in Article 6 §§ 2 and 3. § 2 The carrier may rescind the contract of use forthwith when the manager loses his right to manage the infrastructure. § 3 Each party to the contract may rescind the contract of use forthwith in the case of a clear breach of one of the essential obligations by the other party to the contract, when that obligation concerns the safety of persons or goods; the parties to the contract may agree the modalities for the exercise of this right. § 4 The party to the contract who is the cause of its rescission shall be liable to the other party for the loss or damage resulting from it, unless he proves that the loss or damage was not caused by his fault. § 5 The parties to the contract may agree conditions derogating from the provisions of § 1 letters
- c)and
- d)and § 4. TITLE III LIABILITY Article 8 Liability of the manager § 1 The manager shall be liable
- a)for bodily loss or damage (death, injury or any other physical or mental harm),
- b)for loss of or damage to property (destruction of, or damage to, movable or immovable property),
- c)for pecuniary loss resulting from damages payable by the carrier under the CIV Uniform Rules and the CIM Uniform Rules, caused to the carrier or to his auxiliaries during the use of the infrastructure and having its origin in the infrastructure. § 2 The manager shall be relieved of this liability
- a)in case of bodily loss or damage and pecuniary loss resulting from damages payable by the carrier under the CIV Uniform Rules 1. if the incident giving rise to the loss or damage has been caused by circumstances not connected with the management of the infrastructure which the manager, in spite of having taken the care required in the particular circumstances of the case, could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent, 2. to the extent that the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the fault of the person suffering the loss or damage, 3. if the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the behaviour of a third party which the manager, in spite of having taken the care required in the particular circumstances of the case, could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent;
- b)in case of loss of or damage to property and pecuniary loss resulting from damages payable by the carrier under the CIM Uniform Rules, when the loss or damage was caused by the fault of the carrier or by an order given by the carrier which is not attributable to the manager or by circumstances which the manager could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent. § 3 If the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the behaviour of a third party and if, in spite of that, the manager is not entirely relieved of liability in accordance with § 2, letter a), he shall be liable in full up to the limits laid down in these Uniform Rules but without prejudice to any right of recourse against the third party. § 4 The parties to the contract may agree whether and to what extent the manager shall be liable for the loss or damage caused to the carrier by delay or disruption to his operations. Article 9 Liability of the carrier § 1 The carrier shall be liable
- a)for bodily loss or damage (death, injury or any other physical or mental harm),
- b)for loss of or damage to property (destruction of or damage to movable or immovable property), caused to the manager or to his auxiliaries, during the use of the infrastructure, by the means of transport used or by the persons or goods carried. § 2 The carrier shall be relieved of this liability
- a)in case of bodily loss or damage 1. if the incident giving rise to the loss or damage has been caused by circumstances not connected with the operations of the carrier which he, in spite of having taken the care required in the particular circumstances of the case, could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent, 2. to the extent that the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the fault of the person suffering the loss or damage, 3. if the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the behaviour of a third party which the carrier, in spite of having taken the care required in the particular circumstances of the case, could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent;
- b)in case of loss of or damage to property when the loss or damage is caused by a fault of the manager or by an order given by the manager which is not attributable to the carrier or by circumstances which the carrier could not avoid and the consequences of which he was unable to prevent. § 3 If the incident giving rise to the loss or damage is due to the behaviour of a third party and if, in spite of that, the carrier is not entirely relieved of liability in accordance with § 2, letter a), he shall be liable in full up to the limits laid down in these Uniform Rules but without prejudice to any right of recourse against the third party. § 4 The parties to the contract may agree whether and to what extent the carrier shall be liable for the loss or damage caused to the manager by disruption to his operations. Article 10 Concomitant causes § 1 If causes attributable to the manager and causes attributable to the carrier contributed to the loss or damage, each party to the contract shall be liable only to the extent that the causes attributable to him under Article 8 and 9 contributed to the loss or damage. If it is impossible to assess to what extent the respective causes contributed to the loss or damage, each party shall bear the loss or damage he has sustained. § 2 § 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis if causes attributable to the manager and causes attributable to several carriers using the same railway infrastructure contributed to the loss or damage. § 3 § 1, first sentence, shall apply mutatis mutandis in case of loss or damage referred to in Article 9 if causes attributable to several carriers using the same infrastructure contributed to the loss or damage. If it is impossible to assess to what extent the respective causes contributed to the loss or damage, the carriers shall be liable to the manager in equal shares. Article 11 Damages in case of death § 1 In case of death, the damages shall comprise:
- a)any necessary costs following the death, in particular those of transport of the body and the funeral expenses;
- b)if death does not occur at once, the damages provided for in Article 12. § 2 If, through the death, persons whom the deceased had or would have had in the future a legal duty to maintain, are deprived of their support, they shall also be compensated for that loss. Rights of action for damages by persons whom the deceased was maintaining without being legally bound to do so, shall be governed by national law. Article 12 Damages in case of personal injury In case of personal injury or any other physical or mental harm, the damages shall comprise:
- a)any necessary costs, in particular those of treatment and of transport;
- b)compensation for financial loss, due to total or partial incapacity to work, or to increased needs. Article 13 Compensation for other bodily harm National law shall determine whether and to what extent the manager or the carrier must pay damages for bodily harm other than that provided for in Articles 11 and 12. Article 14 Form and amount of damages in case of death and personal injury § 1 The damages provided for in Article 11 § 2 and in Article 12 letter
- b)must be awarded in the form of a lump sum. However, if national law permits the award of an annuity, the damages shall be awarded in that form if so requested by the injured person or by persons entitled referred to in Article 11 § 2. § 2 The amount of damages to be awarded pursuant to § 1 shall be determined in accordance with national law. However, for the purposes of these Uniform Rules, the upper limit per person shall be set at 175,000 units of account as a lump sum or as an annuity corresponding to that sum, where national law provides for an upper limit of less than that amount. Article 15 Loss of right to invoke the limits of liability The limits of liability provided for in these Uniform Rules as well as the provisions of national law, which limit the compensation to a certain amount, shall not apply if it is proved that the loss or damage results from an act or omission, which the author of the loss or damage has committed either with the intent to cause such loss or damage, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss or damage would probably result. Article 16 Conversion and interest § 1 Where the calculation of compensation requires the conversion of sums expressed in foreign currency, conversion shall be at the exchange rate applicable on the day and at the place of payment of the compensation. § 2 The person entitled may claim interest on compensation, calculated at five per cent per annum, from the day of initiation of a conciliation procedure, of seizure of the Arbitration Tribunal provided for in Title V of the Convention or from the day on which legal proceedings were instituted. Article 17 Liability in case of nuclear incidents The manager and the carrier shall be relieved of liability pursuant to these Uniform Rules for loss or damage caused by a nuclear incident when the operator of a nuclear installation or another person who is substituted for him is liable for the loss or damage pursuant to the laws and prescriptions of a State governing liability in the field of nuclear energy. Article 18 Liability for auxiliaries The manager and the carrier shall be liable for their auxiliaries. Article 19 Other actions § 1 In all cases where these Uniform Rules shall apply, any action in respect of liability, on whatever grounds, may be brought against the manager or against the carrier only subject to the conditions and limitations laid down in these Uniform Rules. § 2 The same shall apply to any action brought against the auxiliaries for whom the manager or the carrier is liable pursuant to Article 18. Article 20 Agreements to settle The parties to the contract may agree conditions in which they assert or renounce their rights to compensation from the other party to the contract. TITLE IV ACTIONS BY AUXILIARIES Article 21 Actions against the manager or against the carrier § 1 Any action in respect of liability brought by the auxiliaries of the carrier against the manager on account of loss or damage caused by him, on whatever grounds, may be brought only subject to the conditions and limitations laid down in these Uniform Rules. § 2 Any action in respect of liability brought by the auxiliaries of the manager against the carrier on account of loss or damage caused by him, on whatever grounds, may be brought only subject to the conditions and limitations laid down in these Uniform Rules. TITLE V ASSERTION OF RIGHTS Article 22 Conciliation procedures The parties to the contract may agree conciliation procedures or appeal to the Arbitration Tribunal provided for in Title V of the Convention. Article 23 Recourse The validity of the payment made by the carrier on the basis of the CIV Uniform Rules or the CIM Uniform Rules may not be disputed when compensation has been determined by a court or tribunal and when the manager, duly served with notice of the proceedings, has been afforded the opportunity to intervene in the proceedings. Article 24 Forum § 1 Actions based on these Uniform Rules may be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member States designated by agreement between the parties to the contract. § 2 Unless the parties to the contract otherwise agree, the competent courts or tribunals shall be those of the Member State where the manager has his place of business. Article 25 Limitation of actions § 1 The period of limitation for actions based on these Uniform Rules shall be three years. § 2 The period of limitation shall run from the day when the loss or damage occurred. § 3 In case of death of persons, the period of limitation shall be three years from the day after the day the death occurred, but not exceeding five years from the day after the day of the accident. § 4 A recourse action by a person held liable may be brought even after the expiration of the limitation period provided for in § 1, if it is brought within the period allowed by the law of the State where the proceedings are brought. However, the period allowed shall be not less than ninety days from the day when the person bringing the recourse action has settled the claim or has been served with notice of the proceedings against himself. § 5 The period of limitation shall be suspended when the parties agree a conciliation procedure or when they seize the Arbitration Tribunal provided for in Title V of the Convention. § 6 Otherwise, suspension and interruption of the limitation period shall be governed by national law. Uniform Rules concerning the Validation of Technical Standards and the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions applicable to Railway Material intended to be used in International Traffic (APTU – Appendix F to the Convention) Article 1 Scope These Uniform Rules lay down, for railway material intended to be used in international traffic, the procedure for the validation of technical standards and the adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions (UTP). Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of these Uniform Rules, their Annex(
- es)and the UTP, in addition to the terms defined in Article 2 of ATMF, the term
- a)„carriage” (or „coach”) means a railway vehicle, not provided with a means of traction, which is intended to carry passengers; the term includes a luggage wagon which is intended to be carried in a passenger train;
- b)„project in an advanced stage of development” means any project whose planning/construction stage has reached a point where a change in the technical specifications would be unacceptable to the Contracting State concerned. Such an impediment may be legal, contractual, economic, financial, social or environmental in nature and must be duly substantiated;
- c)„substitution in the framework of maintenance” means any replacement of components by parts of identical function and performance in the framework of preventive or corrective maintenance;
- d)„technical prescription” means a rule, other than a technical standard, included in the UTP, relating to the construction, operation, maintenance or safety aspects, or relating to a procedure concerning railway material;
- e)„technical standard” means a voluntary standard adopted by a recognised international standardisation body, according to the procedures applicable to it;
- f)„traction unit” means a railway vehicle provided with a means of traction;
- g)„wagon” means a railway vehicle, not provided with a means of traction, which is intended to carry goods. Article 3 Aim § 1 The validation of technical standards relating to railway material and the adoption of UTP applicable to railway material shall have as its aim to
- a)facilitate the free circulation of vehicles and the free use of other railway material in international traffic,
- b)contribute to ensuring the safety, efficiency and the availability for international traffic,
- c)take account of the protection of the environment and public health. § 2 When technical standards are validated or UTP are adopted, only those prepared at the international level shall be taken into account. § 3 To the extent possible
- a)it is appropriate to ensure interoperability of technical systems and components necessary for international traffic;
- b)technical standards and UTP shall be performance related; if appropriate, they shall include variants. Article 4 Preparation of technical standards and UTP § 1 The preparation of technical standards concerning railway material and the standardisation of industrial products and procedures shall be the responsibility of recognised national and international standardisation bodies. § 2 The preparation of UTP shall be the responsibility of the Committee of Technical Experts assisted by appropriate working groups and the Secretary General on the basis of applications made in accordance with Article 6. Article 5 Validation of technical standards § 1 The Committee of Technical Experts shall decide whether to validate a technical standard or specific parts of it in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 16, 20 and 33 § 6 of the Convention. The decisions shall enter into force in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. § 2 An application for validation of a technical standard may be made by:
- a)any Contracting State;
- b)any regional organisation as defined in Article 2
- x)of ATMF;
- c)any national or international standardisation body having the task of standardisation in the railway field; Article 3 § 2 shall be taken into account;
- d)any representative international association for whose members the existence of technical standards relating to railway material is indispensable for reasons of safety and economy in the exercise of their activity. § 3 The references to validated technical standards shall be published by the Secretary General on the website of the Organisation. Once the reference is published, the application of this technical standard gives presumption of compliance with the corresponding UTP. § 4 The application of validated technical standards is voluntary; however, a standard or a part of it may be made obligatory through provisions in a UTP. Article 6 Adoption of UTP § 1 The Committee of Technical Experts shall decide whether to adopt a UTP or a provision amending it in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 16, 20 and 33 § 6 of the Convention. The decisions shall enter into force in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. § 2 An application for adoption of a UTP or a provision amending it according to § 1 may be made by:
- a)any Contracting State;
- b)any regional organisation as defined in Article 2
- x)of ATMF;
- c)any representative international association for whose members the existence of UTP relating to railway material is indispensable for reasons of safety and economy in the exercise of their activity. Article 7 Form of applications Applications referred to in Articles 5 and 6 shall be sent to the Secretary General and addressed to the Committee of Technical Experts in one of the working languages according to Article 1 § 6 of the Convention. The Committee of Technical Experts may reject any application, if it considers the application not to be complete, coherent, properly reasoned or justified. The application shall include an assessment of social, economic and environmental consequences. Article 7a Assessment of consequences § 1 The Committee of Technical Experts shall take its decision after consideration of the reasoning and justification provided by the applicant. § 2 The assessment shall indicate the likely impact for all Contracting States, operators and other relevant actors concerned. If the proposal has an impact on UTP other than the one for which the proposal is directly intended, these interfaces shall also be taken into account. § 3 All concerned entities shall participate in the assessment by providing free of charge the requisite data unless covered by intellectual property rights. Article 8 UTP § 1 The adopted UTP shall be published on the website of the Organisation. § 2 In principle, each subsystem shall be subject to one UTP. Where relevant, a subsystem may be covered by several UTP and one UTP may cover several subsystems. § 2a The UTP shall apply to new subsystems. They shall also apply to an existing subsystem when it is renewed or upgraded and in accordance with the migration strategy referred to in § 4 f). § 3 After the notification process according to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention and at least one month before entry into force, the Secretary General shall publish on the website of the Organisation
- a)the adopted and notified UTP;
- b)the date of its entry into force;
- c)the list of Contracting States to which this UTP applies;
- d)the updated list of UTP and their date of entry into force. § 4 To the extent necessary to achieve the aim set out in Article 3, the UTP referring to subsystems shall at least:
- a)indicate its intended scope (part of network or vehicles; subsystem or part of subsystem);
- b)lay down essential requirements for each subsystem concerned and its interfaces vis-à-vis other subsystems;
- c)establish the functional and technical specifications to be met by the subsystem and its interfaces vis-à-vis other subsystems. If need be, these specifications may vary according to the use of the subsystem, for example according to the categories of line, hub and/or vehicles;
- d)determine the elements of construction or interoperability constituents and interfaces which must be covered by technical standards, which are necessary to achieve interoperability within the rail system;
- e)state, in each case under consideration, which procedures are to be used in order to assess the conformity with the provisions of the UTP. These procedures shall be based on the assessment modules defined in a general UTP referred to in § 8;
- f)indicate the strategy for implementing the UTP. In particular, it is necessary to specify the stages to be completed in order to make a gradual transition from the existing situation to the final situation in which compliance with the UTP shall be the norm; for each stage, appropriate transitional provisions shall be included and
- g)indicate, for the staff concerned, the professional qualifications and health and safety conditions at work required for the operation and maintenance of the subsystem concerned, as well as for the implementation of the UTP. § 5 Each UTP shall be drawn up on the basis of an examination of an existing subsystem and indicate one or more target subsystems that may be obtained gradually within a reasonable time scale. Accordingly, the gradual adoption of the UTP and compliance therewith will help gradually to achieve the interoperability of the rail system. § 6 The UTP shall retain, in an appropriate manner, the compatibility of the existing rail system of each Contracting State. With this objective, provision may be made in each UTP for „specific cases” covering one or more Contracting States, with regard to both network and vehicles; special attention must be given to the loading gauge, the track gauge or space between the tracks and to vehicles originating from or destined for third countries. For each specific case, the UTP shall stipulate the implementing rules of the elements indicated in § 4
- c)to g). § 7 If certain technical aspects corresponding to the essential requirements cannot be explicitly covered in the UTP, they shall be clearly identified in it as „open points”. § 8 The Committee of Technical Experts may adopt UTP which do not refer to subsystems, such as general provisions, essential requirements or assessment modules. § 9 The UTP shall have a two column format. Text which appears in full width without columns is identical to corresponding texts of the European Community Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI). Text which is split into two columns is different for the UTP and for the corresponding TSI or other corresponding European Community regulations. The left-hand column shows the UTP text (OTIF regulations), while the right-hand column shows the European Community TSI text. On the far right the TSI reference is indicated. Article 8a Deficiencies in UTP § 1 If it comes to the attention of the Committee of Technical Experts that an adopted UTP contains errors or deficiencies including where an adopted UTP does not fully meet the essential requirements, the Committee shall take the appropriate measures including:
- a)the decision whether the relevant UTP may need to be amended in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 and
- b)recommendations for justified provisional solutions. § 2 The Contracting States, regional organisations and assessing bodies have the obligation to inform the Secretary General without delay if they discover errors or deficiencies in a UTP. Article 9 Declarations § 1 Any Contracting State may, within a period of four months from the day of notification of the decision of the Committee of Technical Experts by the Secretary General, make a reasoned declaration notifying him that it will not apply or will apply only partially, the validated technical standard or the adopted UTP, so far as it concerns the railway infrastructure situated on its territory and the traffic on that infrastructure. § 2 The Contracting States which have made
§ 1
shall not be taken into account in determining the number of States which must formulate an objection in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention, in order that a decision of the Committee of Technical Experts should not enter into force. § 3 A State which has made
§ 1may withdraw it at any time by notification to the Secretary General.
This withdrawal shall take effect on the first day of the second month following the notification. Article 10 Abrogation of Technical Unity The entry into force of the UTP, adopted by the Committee of Technical Experts in accordance with Article 6 § 1, in all the States parties to the 1938 version of the International Convention on the Technical Unity of Railways, signed at Berne on 21 October 1882, shall abrogate that convention. Article 11 Precedence of the UTP § 1 With the entry into force of the UTP, adopted by the Committee of Technical Experts in accordance with Article 6 § 1, the technical standards and the UTP shall take precedence, in relations between Contracting States, over the provisions of the 1938 version of the International Convention on the Technical Unity of Railways, signed at Berne on 21 October 1882. § 2 With the entry into force of the UTP, adopted by the Committee of Technical Experts in accordance with Article 6 § 1, these Uniform Rules as well as the technical standards and the UTP, shall take precedence, in the Contracting States, over the technical provisions
- a)of the Regulation governing the reciprocal use of carriages and brake vans in international traffic (RIC),
- b)of the Regulation governing the reciprocal use of wagons in international traffic (RIV). Article 12 National technical requirements § 1 Contracting States shall ensure that the Secretary General is informed of their national technical requirements which apply to railway vehicles and other railway material. The Secretary General shall publish these requirements in the data bank referred to in Article 13 of the ATMF Uniform Rules. The information shall be received by the Secretary General within 3 months from the day when the revised Uniform Rules enter into force. Such a requirement may stay in force only until it or an analogous requirement is brought into force through the adoption of prescriptions according to the Articles above. The Contracting State may at any time withdraw the temporary provision and notify this to the Secretary General. § 2 When a UTP has been adopted or amended, the Contracting State shall ensure that the Secretary General is informed – with justification – of those national technical requirements mentioned in § 1 which it will still require to be complied with in order to ensure the technical compatibility between the vehicles and its network concerned; this includes national rules applicable to „open points” in the technical prescriptions and applicable to the specific cases duly identified in the technical prescription. The information shall include indication of the „open point(s)” and/or „specific case(s)” in the UTP to which each national technical requirement relates. The national technical requirements shall only remain valid if the notification is received by the Secretary General within 6 months from the day when the technical prescription in question or the change to it has entered into force. § 3 The information shall include the full text of the national technical provision in an official language of the Contracting State as well as the title and a summary in one of the official OTIF languages. Article 13 Equivalence table § 1 In order to minimise the assessments and thereby the costs for applying for a technical admission, national technical requirements in accordance with Article 12 shall be classified pursuant to the list of parameters and the principles set out in the Annex to these Uniform Rules. The classification shall be carried out under the responsibility of the Committee of Technical Experts. The Contracting States and the regional organisations shall cooperate with the Committee of Technical Experts and the Secretary General in this task. § 2 The Committee of Technical Experts may review the Annex taking account of the experience with the cross-acceptance of vehicles in the Contracting States. § 3 The Committee of Technical Experts shall ensure that a reference document is drawn up cross-referencing all the notified national technical requirements. The reference document shall also indicate the relevant provisions in the UTP and the corresponding TSI (Article 8 § 9). The reference document shall be published on the website of the Organisation and shall be kept up to date. § 4 Taking due account of the opinion of the Contracting States concerned and of the regional organisations involved, the Committee of Technical Experts may decide to declare the equivalence in railway safety terms:
- a)between national technical requirements of different Contracting States;
- b)between provisions in the UTP and the corresponding TSI; and
- c)between national technical requirements of one or more Contracting States and provisions in the UTP and/or provisions in the TSI. The declared equivalence shall be indicated in an equivalence table in the reference document mentioned in § 3 above. Annex Parameters to be checked in Conjunction with the Technical Admission of Non-UTP Conform Vehicles and Classification of the National Technical Requirements 1. List of Parameters 1.1 General documentation 1.1.1.1. General documentation (including description of new, renewed or upgraded vehicle and its intended use, design, repair, operation and maintenance information, technical file, etc.) 1.2 Structure and mechanical parts 1.1.1.2. Mechanical integrity and interface between vehicles (including draw and buffer gear, gangways), strength of vehicle structure and fittings (e.g. seats), loading capability, passive safety (including interior and exterior crashworthiness) 1.3 Track interaction and gauging 1.1.1.3. Mechanical interfaces to the infrastructure (including static and dynamic behaviour, clearances and fits, gauge, running gear, etc.) 1.4. Braking equipment 1.1.1.4. Braking-related items (including wheel-slide protection, braking control, and braking performance in service, emergency and parking modes) 1.5 Passenger-related items 1.1.1.5. Passenger facilities and passenger environment (including passenger windows and doors, requirements for persons with reduced mobility, etc.) 1.6 Environmental conditions and aerodynamic effects 1.1.1.6. Impact of the environment on the vehicle and impact of the vehicle on the environment (including aerodynamic conditions and both the interface between the vehicle and the trackside part of the railway system and the interface with the external environment) 1.7 External warning, marking, functions and software integrity requirements 1.1.1.7. External warnings, markings, functions and integrity of software, e.g. safety-related functions with an impact on train behaviour including train bus 1.8 Onboard power supply and control systems 1.1.1.8. Onboard propulsion, power and control systems, plus the interface of the vehicle with the power supply infrastructure and all aspects of electromagnetic compatibility 1.9 Staff facilities, interfaces and environment 1.1.1.9. On-board facilities, interfaces, working conditions and environment for staff (including drivers’ cabs, driver machine interface) 1.10 Fire safety and evacuation 1.11 Servicing 1.1.1.10. Onboard facilities and interfaces for servicing 1.12 Onboard control, command and signalling 1.1.1.11. All the on-board equipment necessary to ensure safety and to command and control movements of trains authorised to travel on the network and its effects on the trackside part of the railway system 1.13 Specific operational requirements 1.1.1.12. Specific operational requirements for vehicles (including degraded mode, vehicle recovery etc.) 1.14 Freight related items 1.1.1.13. Freight-specific requirements and environment (including facilities specifically required for dangerous goods) Explanations and examples in italics above are for information only and are not definitions of the parameters. 2. Classification of the National Technical Requirements The national technical requirements relating to the parameters identified in section 1 shall be attributed to one of the following three groups. Rules and restrictions of a strictly local nature are not involved; their verification involves checks to be put in place by mutual agreement between the railway undertakings and the infrastructure managers. Group A Group A covers: – international standards, – national rules deemed to be equivalent, in railway safety terms, to national rules of other Member States, – national rules deemed to be equivalent, in railway safety terms, to the provisions in the UTP and/or provisions in the TSI. Group B Group B covers all rules that do not fall within the scope of Group A or Group C, or that it has not yet been possible to classify in one of these groups. Group C Group C covers rules that are strictly necessary and are associated with technical infrastructure characteristics, in order to ensure safe and interoperable use in the network concerned (e.g. the loading gauge). Uniform Rules concerning the Technical Admission of Railway Material used in International Traffic (ATMF – Appendix G to the Convention) Article 1 Scope These Uniform Rules lay down, for railway vehicles and other railway material, the procedure for the admission to circulation or use in international traffic. Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of these Uniform Rules and their (future) Annex(es), the APTU Uniform Rules and their Annex(
- es)and the APTU Uniform Technical Prescriptions (UTP) the following definitions shall apply:
- a)„accident” means an unwanted or unintended sudden event or a specific chain of such events which have harmful consequences; accidents are divided into the following categories: collisions, derailments, level-crossing accidents, accidents to persons caused by rolling stock in motion, fires and others;
- b)„admission of a type of construction” means the right granted by which the competent authority authorises a type of construction of a railway vehicle, as a basis for the admission to operation for vehicles which correspond to that type of construction;
- c)„admission to operation” means the right granted by which the competent authority authorises each railway vehicle or other railway material to operate in international traffic;
- d)„Committee of Technical Experts” means the Committee provided for in Article 13 § 1,
- f)of the Convention;
- da)„contracting entity” means any entity, whether public or private, which orders the design and/or construction or the renewal or upgrading of a subsystem. This entity may be a railway undertaking, an infrastructure manager or a keeper, or the concession holder responsible for carrying out a project;
- e)„Contracting State” means a Member State of the Organisation which has not made a declaration in respect of these Uniform Rules in accordance with Article 42 § 1, first sentence of the Convention;
- f)„declaration” means the evidence of an assessment or an element of assessments carried out to confirm that a vehicle, a type of construction or an element of construction complies with the provisions of the APTU Uniform Rules and its UTP (including applicable specific cases and national requirements in force according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules);
- g)„element of construction” or „constituent” means any elementary component, group of components, complete or subassembly of equipment incorporated or intended to be incorporated into a railway vehicle, other railway material or infrastructure; the concept of an „element of construction” covers both tangible objects and intangible objects such as software;
- h)„entity in charge of maintenance” (ECM) means the entity that is in charge of the maintenance of a vehicle, and is registered as such in the vehicle register according to Article 13; this definition also applies to other railway material;
- i)„essential requirements” means all the conditions set out in the APTU Uniform Rules which must be met by the rail system, the subsystems and the interoperability constituents, including interfaces;
- j)„incident” means any occurrence, other than accident or serious accident, associated with the operation of trains and affecting the safety of operation;
- k)„infrastructure manager” means an undertaking or an authority which manages railway infrastructure;
- l)„international traffic” means the circulation of railway vehicles on railway lines over the territory of at least two Contracting States;
- m)„investigation” means a process conducted for the purpose of accident and incident prevention which includes the gathering and analysis of information, the drawing of conclusions, including the determination of causes (actions, omissions, events or conditions, or a combination thereof, which led to the accident or incident) and, when appropriate, the making of safety recommendations;
- n)„keeper” means the person or entity that, being the owner of a vehicle or having the right to use it, exploits the vehicle as a means of transport and is registered as such in the vehicle register referred to in Article 13;
- o)„Maintenance File” means the document(
- s)that specify the inspections and maintenance tasks to be carried out on a (type
- of)vehicle or other railway material, which is set up according to the rules and specifications in the UTP including specific cases and notified national technical requirements in force, if any, according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules;
- p)„Maintenance Record File” means the documentation relating to an admitted vehicle or other railway material, which contains the record of its operating history and the inspections and maintenance operations that have been carried out on it;
- q)„network” means the lines, stations, terminals, and all kinds of fixed equipment needed to ensure safe and continuous operation of the rail system;
- r)„open points” means technical aspects relating to essential requirements which have not explicitly been covered in a UTP;
- s)„other railway material” means any movable railway material intended to be used in international traffic that is not a railway vehicle;
- t)„rail transport undertaking” means a private or public undertaking – which is authorised to carry persons or goods by rail and which ensures traction or – which only ensures traction;
- u)„railway infrastructure” (or just „infrastructure”) means all the railway lines and fixed installations so far as these are necessary for the compatibility with and safe circulation of railway vehicles and other railway material admitted according to these Uniform Rules;
- v)„railway material” means railway vehicles, other railway material and railway infrastructures;
- w)„railway vehicle” means a vehicle suitable to circulate on its own wheels on railway lines with or without traction;
- x)„regional organisation” means an organisation as defined in Article 38 of the Convention within the exclusive competence that Contracting States have ceded to it;
- y)„renewal” means any major substitution work on a subsystem or part subsystem which does not change the overall performance of the subsystem;
- ya)„RID” means Appendix C to the Convention;
- z)„serious accident” means any train collision or derailment of trains, resulting in the death of at least one person or serious injuries to five or more persons or extensive damage to rolling stock, the railway infrastructure or the environment, and any other similar accident with an obvious impact on railway safety regulation or the management of safety; „extensive damage” means damage that can immediately be assessed by the investigating body to cost at least 1.8 million SDR in total;
- aa)„specific case” means any part of the rail system of the Contracting States which needs special provisions in the UTP, either temporary or definitive, because of geographical, topographical or urban environment constraints or those affecting compatibility with the existing system. This may include in particular railway lines and networks isolated from the rest of the network, the loading gauge, the track gauge or space between the tracks as well as vehicles and other railway material strictly intended for local, regional or historical use, and vehicles and other railway material originating from or destined for third countries;
- bb)„subsystems” means the result of the division of the rail system, as shown in the UTP; these subsystems, for which essential requirements must be laid down, may be structural or functional;
- cc)„technical admission” means the procedure carried out by the competent authority to authorise a railway vehicle or other railway material to operate in international traffic or to authorise the type of construction;
- dd)„technical certificate” means the official evidence of a successful technical admission in the form of a valid Design Type Certificate or a valid Certificate to Operation;
- ee)„Technical File” means the documentation relating to the vehicle or other railway material containing all its (the type’
- s)technical characteristics, including a user manual and the characteristics necessary to identify the object(
- s)concerned; eea) „TSI” means Technical Specification for Interoperability adopted in accordance with Directives 96/48/EC, 2001/16/EC and 2008/57/EC by which each subsystem or part of a subsystem is covered in order to meet the essential requirements and ensure the interoperability of the rail system;
- ff)„type of construction” means the basic design characteristics of the railway vehicle or other railway material as covered by a single type examination certificate described in assessment module SB of the UTP;
- gg)„upgrading” means any major modification work on a subsystem or part subsystem which improves the overall performance of the subsystem. Article 3 Admission to international traffic § 1 Each railway vehicle must, for circulation in international traffic, be admitted in accordance with these Uniform Rules. § 2 The technical admission shall have the aim of ascertaining whether the railway vehicles satisfy
- a)the construction prescriptions contained in the UTP,
- b)the construction and equipment prescriptions contained in RID,
- c)the special conditions of an admission under Article 7a. § 3 §§ 1 and 2 as well as the following articles shall apply mutatis mutandis to the technical admission of other railway material and of elements of construction either of vehicles or of other railway material. Article 3a Interaction with other international agreements § 1 Railway vehicles and other railway material which have been placed in service according to applicable European Community (EC) and corresponding national legislation shall be deemed as admitted to operation by all Contracting States according to these Uniform Rules
- a)in the case of full equivalence between the provisions in the applicable TSIs and the corresponding UTP and
- b)provided the set of applicable TSIs, against which the railway vehicle or other railway material was authorised, cover all aspects of the relevant subsystems that are part of the vehicle and
- c)provided these TSIs do not contain open points related to the technical compatibility with infrastructure and
- d)provided the vehicle or other railway material is not subject to a derogation. If these conditions are not fulfilled, the vehicle or other railway material shall be subject to Article 6 § 4. § 2 Railway vehicles and other railway material which have been admitted to operation according to these Uniform Rules shall be deemed as placed in service in the Member States of the European Community and in the States which apply Community legislation as a result of international agreements with the European Community in the case of
- a)full equivalence between the provisions in the applicable UTP and the corresponding TSIs and
- b)provided the set of applicable UTP against which the railway vehicle or other railway material was authorised covers all aspects of the relevant subsystems that are part of the vehicle and
- c)provided these UTP do not contain open points related to the technical compatibility with infrastructure and
- d)provided the vehicle or other railway material is not subject to a derogation. If these conditions are not fulfilled, the vehicle or other railway material shall be subject to authorisation according to the law applicable in the Member States of the European Community and in the States which apply Community legislation as a result of international agreements with the European Community. § 3 The admission to operation, the operation and the maintenance of railway vehicles and other railway material being used only in Member States of the European Community are regulated by the applicable Community and national legislation. This provision is also applicable to Contracting States which apply relevant European Community legislation as a result of international agreements with the European Community. § 4 §§ 1 to 2 apply mutatis mutandis to admissions/authorisations of vehicle types § 5 An entity in charge of maintenance (ECM) for a freight wagon, certified according to Article 15 § 2, shall be deemed as certified according to applicable European Community and corresponding national legislation and vice versa in the case of full equivalence between the certification system adopted under Article 14a
(5)of the EC Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC and rules adopted by the Committee of Technical Experts according to Article 15 § 2. Article 4 Procedure § 1 Technical admission of a vehicle shall be carried out
- a)either in a single stage by the granting of admission to operation to a given individual vehicle,
- b)or in two successive stages, by the granting – of admission of a type of construction to a given type of construction, – subsequently an admission to operation to individual vehicles corresponding to this type of construction by a simplified procedure verifying that they are of this type. § 2 The assessments of the conformity of a vehicle or an element of construction with the provisions of the UTP on which the admission is based may be divided into assessment elements each evidenced by a declaration. The assessment elements and the format of the declaration shall be defined by the Committee of Technical Experts. § 3 The procedures for the technical admission of railway infrastructure are subject to the provisions in force in the Contracting State in question. Article 5 Competent authority § 1 The technical admission shall be the task of the national or international authority competent in the matter in accordance with the laws and prescriptions in force in each Contracting State. § 2 The authorities referred to in § 1 may or, according to the provisions in force in their State, shall transfer to bodies with residence in their State recognised as suitable, competence to carry out assessments as a whole or partly, including the issuing of the corresponding declarations. The transfer of competence to
- a)a rail transport undertaking,
- b)an infrastructure manager,
- c)a keeper,
- d)an entity in charge of maintenance (ECM),
- e)a designer or manufacturer of railway material participating directly or indirectly in the manufacture of railway material, including subsidiaries of the foregoing entities shall be prohibited. § 3 In order to be recognised as suitable the bodies mentioned in § 2 must fulfil the following conditions:
- a)The body must be independent in its organisation, legal structure and decision making from any railway undertaking, infrastructure manager, applicant and procurement entity; its Director and the staff responsible for carrying out the assessments or issuing certificates and declarations may not become involved, either directly or as authorised representatives, in the design, manufacture, construction or maintenance of the constituents, vehicles or railway material or in the use thereof. This does not exclude the possibility of an exchange of technical information between the manufacturer or constructor and that body.
- b)The body and the staff responsible for the assessments shall carry out the assessments with the greatest possible professional integrity and the greatest possible technical competence and shall be free of any pressure and incentive, in particular of a financial nature, which could affect their judgement or the results of their inspection, in particular from persons or groups of persons affected by the results of the assessments.
- c)In particular, the body and the staff responsible for the assessments shall be functionally independent of the bodies in charge of investigations in the event of accidents.
- d)The body shall employ staff and possess the means required to perform adequately the technical and administrative tasks linked to the assessments; it shall also have access to the equipment needed for exceptional assessments.
- e)The staff responsible for the assessments shall possess – proper technical and vocational training, – satisfactory knowledge of the requirements relating to the assessments that they carry out and sufficient practice in those assessments and – the ability to draw up the certificates, records and reports which constitute the formal record of the assessments conducted.
- f)The independence of the staff responsible for the assessments shall be guaranteed. No official must be remunerated on the basis of the number of assessments performed or of the results of those assessments.
- g)The body shall procure civil liability insurance unless that liability is covered by the State under national law or unless the assessments are carried out directly by that Contracting State.
- h)The staff of the body shall be bound by professional secrecy with regard to everything they learn in the performance of their duties (with the exception of the competent administrative authorities in the State where they perform those activities) in pursuance of these Uniform Rules or any legal requirement and/or regulations of the Contracting State, including, where appropriate, the law of the European Community. § 4 The requirements of § 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the authorities carrying out technical admission. § 5 A Contracting State shall ensure, by notification or where appropriate by the means provided for in the law of the European Community or in the law of the States which apply Community legislation as a result of international agreements with the European Community, that the Secretary General is informed of the bodies responsible for carrying out the assessments, verifications and approvals, indicating each body’s area of responsibility. The Secretary General shall publish a list of bodies, their identification numbers and areas of responsibility, and shall keep the list updated. § 6 A Contracting State shall ensure the consistent supervision of the bodies indicated in § 2 and shall withdraw the competence from a body which no longer meets the criteria referred to in § 3, in which case it shall immediately inform the Secretary General thereof. § 7 Should a Contracting State consider that an assessing or approving authority of another Contracting State, or a body having competence transferred from it, does not meet the criteria of § 3, the matter shall be transferred to the Committee of Technical Experts which, within four months, shall inform the Contracting State in question of any changes that are necessary for the body to retain the status conferred upon it. In relation to this, the Committee of Technical Experts may decide to instruct the Contracting State to suspend or withdraw approvals made on the basis of work done by the body or by the authority in question. Article 6 Validity of technical certificates § 1 Technical certificates issued by the competent authority of a Contracting State in accordance with these Uniform Rules, shall be valid in all the other Contracting States. However the circulation and use on the territories of those other States shall be subject to the conditions specified in this Article. § 2 An admission to operation allows the rail transport undertakings to operate a vehicle only on infrastructures compatible with the vehicle according to its specifications and other conditions of the admission; it is the responsibility of the rail transport undertaking to ensure this. § 3 Without prejudice to Article 3a an admission to operation issued for a vehicle which is in conformity with all applicable UTP shall permit the vehicle free circulation on the territories of other Contracting States provided that
- a)all essential requirements are covered in these UTP and
- b)the vehicle is not subject to – a specific case or – open points that are related to technical compatibility with the infrastructure or – a derogation. The conditions for the free circulation may also be specified in the relevant UTP. § 4
- a)Where in a Contracting State an admission to operation has been issued for a vehicle which is – subject to a specific case, an open point which is related to the technical compatibility with the infrastructure or a derogation, or – not in conformity with the UTP on rolling stock and all other relevant provisions, or
- b)where not all essential requirements are covered in the UTP, the competent authorities of the other States may ask the applicant for additional technical information such as risk analysis and/or vehicle tests before granting a complementary admission to operation. For the part of the vehicle which is compliant with a UTP or part of it, the competent authorities have to accept verifications that have been made by other competent authorities according to the UTP. For the other part of the vehicle the competent authorities shall take full account of the equivalence table referred to in Article 13 of the APTU Uniform Rules. The fulfilment of
- a)identical provisions and provisions declared equivalent,
- b)provisions not related to a specific case and
- c)provisions not related to the technical compatibility with infrastructure, shall not be assessed again. § 5 §§ 2 to 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an admission of a type of construction. Article 6a Recognition of procedural documentation § 1 Assessments, declarations and other documentation made according to these Uniform Rules shall be recognised at face value by the authorities and competent bodies, the rail transport undertakings, the keepers and the infrastructure managers in all the Contracting States. § 2 If a requirement or a provision has been declared as equivalent in accordance with Article 13 of the APTU Uniform Rules related assessments and tests which have already been carried out and documented shall not be repeated. Article 6b Recognition of technical and operational tests The Committee of Technical Experts may adopt rules for inclusion in an Annex to these Uniform Rules and requirements for inclusion in one or more UTP concerning the provisions for and the mutual recognition of technical inspections, maintenance record files for the admitted vehicles and operational tests such as train braking tests. Article 7 Prescriptions applicable to vehicles § 1 In order to be admitted and remain admitted to circulation in international traffic, a railway vehicle must satisfy
- a)the UTP and
- b)where applicable, the provisions contained in RID. § 2 In the absence of UTP applicable to the subsystem, the technical admission shall be based on the applicable national technical requirements in force according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules in the Contracting State in which an application for technical admission is made. § 3 If the UTP do not cover all essential requirements or in the case of specific cases or open points, the technical admission shall be based on
- a)the provisions contained in the UTP,
- b)where applicable, the provisions contained in RID and
- c)applicable national technical requirements in force according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules. Article 7a Derogations The Committee of Technical Experts shall adopt guidelines or mandatory provisions for derogations from the provisions of Article 7 and for the assessment methods that may or shall be used. Article 8 Prescriptions applicable to railway infrastructure § 1 To ensure that a railway vehicle admitted to international traffic in accordance with these Uniform Rules will run safely on and be compatible with the railway infrastructure to be used this railway infrastructure must satisfy
- a)the provisions contained in the UTP and
- b)where applicable, the provisions contained in RID. § 2 Admission of infrastructure and supervision of its maintenance remain subject to the provisions in force in the Contracting State in which the infrastructure is located. § 3 Article 7 and 7a shall apply mutatis mutandis to infrastructure. Article 9 Operation prescriptions § 1 The rail transport undertakings which operate railway vehicles admitted to circulation in international traffic shall be required to comply with the prescriptions relating to the operation of a vehicle in international traffic, specified in the UTP. § 2 The undertakings and administrations which manage infrastructure in the Contracting States, including operational safety and control systems, intended and suitable for operation in international traffic, shall be required to comply with the technical prescriptions specified in the UTP and satisfy them permanently in respect of the construction and the management of that infrastructure. Article 10 Application and granting of technical certificates and declarations and related conditions § 1 The grant of a technical certificate shall be related to the type of construction of a railway vehicle or to the railway vehicle itself. § 2 An application for a technical certificate may be made by:
- a)the manufacturer,
- b)a rail transport undertaking,
- c)the keeper of the vehicle,
- d)the owner of the vehicle,
- e)the infrastructure manager. § 3 The application for a technical certificate, including appropriate declarations, may be made to any competent authority or body within its competence referred to in Article 5, of one of the Contracting States. § 4 If Article 6 § 4 applies to the vehicle, the applicant shall indicate the Contracting States (if applicable the lines) for which the technical certificates are required to permit free circulation; in this case the competent authorities and assessing bodies involved should cooperate in order to make the process easier for the applicant. § 5 All costs arising from the admission process shall be covered by the applicant, unless provided otherwise according to the laws and prescriptions in force in the State where the approval is granted. Carrying out technical admissions for profit shall not be permitted. 5a All decisions, assessments, tests etc. shall be carried out in a non-discriminatory way. § 6 The applicant shall elaborate and attach to his application a Technical File and a Maintenance File containing the information required in the UTP. The assessing body shall check, correct and add appropriate information to these files in order that the files reflect the properties of the vehicle. § 7 Every assessment carried out shall be documented by the assessor in an Assessment Report which shall substantiate the assessments carried out hereby, stating which provisions the object has been assessed against and whether the object passed or failed this assessment. § 8 A person who applies for a Certificate of Operation by the simplified procedure of technical admission [Article 4 § 1, b)], shall attach to his application the Design Type Certificate, established in accordance with Article 11 § 2, and demonstrate in an appropriate manner that the vehicles for which he is applying for a Certificate of Operation correspond to that type of construction. § 9 A technical certificate shall be granted in principle for an unlimited period; it can be general or limited in scope. § 10 If relevant provisions in the prescriptions according to Article 7 on the basis of which a type of construction has been admitted have been changed, and if no relevant transitional provisions can be applied, the Contracting State in which the corresponding Design Type Certificate has been issued, and after consultation of the other States where the Certificate is valid according to Article 6, shall decide whether the Certificate may remain valid or need to be renewed. The criteria which shall be checked in the case of a renewed type admission may only concern the changed provisions. The renewal of the type admission does not affect admissions to operation already granted on the basis of previously admitted types. § 11 In the event of renewal or upgrading, the contracting entity or the manufacturer shall send the Contracting State concerned a file describing the project. The Contracting State shall examine this file and, taking account of the implementation strategy indicated in the applicable UTP, shall decide whether the extent of the work means that a new admission to operation within the meaning of these Uniform Rules is needed. Such a new admission to operation shall be required whenever the overall safety level of the subsystem concerned may be adversely affected by the work envisaged. If a new admission is needed, the Contracting State shall decide to what extent the provisions in the related UTP need to be applied to the project. The Contracting State shall take its decision not later than four months after submission of the complete file by the applicant. When a new admission is required and if the UTP are not fully applied, the Contracting States shall notify to the Secretary General
- a)the reason why a UTP is not fully applied,
- b)the technical characteristics applicable in place of the UTP and
- c)the bodies responsible for providing the information required under
- a)and b). The Secretary General shall publish the notified information on the website of the Organisation. § 12 § 11 applies mutatis mutandis to a Design Type Certificate and to any declaration concerning the construction or the elements of construction in question. Article 10a Rules for withdrawals or suspensions of technical certificates § 1 If a competent authority of a Contracting State other than the one which has granted the (first) admission to operation discovers non-compliance it shall, with all details, inform the (first) admitting authority; if the non-compliance relates to a Design Type Certificate, the authority which issued it shall also be informed. § 2 A Certificate of Operation may be withdrawn
- a)when the railway vehicle no longer satisfies – the prescriptions contained in the UTP and in applicable national provisions in force according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules, or – the special conditions of its admission under Article 7a or – the construction and equipment prescriptions contained in RID or
- b)if the keeper does not comply with the requirement of the competent authority to remedy the defects within the prescribed time or
- c)when stipulations and conditions resulting from a limited admission under Article 10 § 10 are not fulfilled or complied with. § 3 Only the authority which has granted the Design Type Certificate or the Certificate of Operation may withdraw it. § 4 The Certificate of Operation shall be suspended
- a)when technical checks, inspections, maintenance and servicing of the railway vehicle prescribed in its Maintenance File, in the UTP, in the special conditions of an admission pursuant to Article 7a or in the construction and equipment prescriptions contained in RID are not carried out (or if deadlines are not observed);
- b)if in case of severe damage to a railway vehicle, the order of the competent authority to present the vehicle is not complied with;
- c)in case of non-compliance with these Uniform Rules and prescriptions contained in the UTP;
- d)if applicable national provisions in force according to Article 12 of the APTU Uniform Rules or their declared equivalent provisions according to Article 13 of the APTU Uniform Rules are not complied with. The validity of the Certificate shall be suspended for the Contracting State(
- s)concerned. § 5 The Certificate of Operation shall become void when the railway vehicle is withdrawn from service. This withdrawal from service shall be notified to the competent authority which has granted the admission to operation. § 6 §§ 1 to 4 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Design Type Certificate. Article 10b Rules for assessments and procedures § 1 The Committee of Technical Experts is competent to adopt further mandatory provisions for the assessments and procedural rules for technical admission. § 2 In addition to, but not in contradiction with the provisions set by the Committee of Technical Experts according to § 1, Contracting States or regional organisations may adopt (or maintain) provisions for non-discriminatory detailed mandatory procedures for the assessments and requirements concerning declarations. These provisions shall be notified to the Secretary General, who shall inform the Committee of Technical Experts, and they shall be published by the Organisation. Article 11 Technical Certificates and Declarations § 1 The admission of a type of construction and the admission to operation shall be evidenced by separate documents called: „Design Type Certificate” and „Certificate of Operation”. § 2 The Design Type Certificate shall:
- a)specify the designer and intended manufacturer of the type of construction of the railway vehicle;
- b)have the Technical File and the Maintenance File attached;
- c)if appropriate, specify the special operating limitations and conditions for the type of construction of a railway vehicle and for railway vehicles which correspond to this type of construction;
- d)have the Assessment Report(
- s)attached;
- e)if appropriate, specify all related declarations (of conformity and verification) issued;
- f)specify the issuing competent authority, date of issue and contain the signature of the authority;
- g)if appropriate, specify its period of validity. § 3 The Certificate of Operation shall include
- a)all the information indicated in § 2, and
- b)the identification code(
- s)of the vehicle(
- s)covered by the certificate;
- c)information on the keeper of the railway vehicle(
- s)covered by the certificate on the day of its issue;
- d)if appropriate, its period of validity. § 4 The Certificate of Operation may cover a group of individual vehicles of the same type, in which case the information required according to § 3 shall be specified identifiably for each of the vehicles of the group and the Technical File shall contain a list with identifiable documentation concerning the tests made on each vehicle. § 5 The Technical File and the Maintenance File shall contain the information according to the provisions in the UTP. § 6 The certificates shall be printed in one of the working languages according to Article 1 § 6 of the Convention. § 7 The certificates and declarations shall be issued to the applicant. § 8 The Certificate of Operation is related to the object. Once the vehicle is in operation the holder of the Certificate of Operation (including the Technical File and the Maintenance File), if not the current keeper, shall without delay hand it over to the current keeper together with the Maintenance Record File and make available all (additional) detailed instructions for maintenance and operations that are still in his possession. § 9 § 8 applies mutatis mutandis to vehicles and railway material admitted according to Article 19, whereby the documentation in question is the approval documentation and any other documentation containing any information similar to what is included in the requirements for the Technical File, Maintenance File and Maintenance Record File, whether in full or in part. Article 12 Uniform formats § 1 The Organisation shall prescribe uniform formats of the certificates indicated in Article 11, of the declarations decided according to Article 4 § 2 and of the Assessment Report according to Article 10 § 7. § 2 The formats shall be prepared and adopted by the Committee of Technical Experts. § 3 The Committee of Technical Experts may decide to allow certificates and declarations made according to another specified format than that prescribed in these Uniform Rules, but containing the information required according to Article 11, to be recognised as equivalent substitutes. Article 13 Registers § 1 A register in the form of an electronic data bank containing information concerning the railway vehicles in respect of which a Certificate of Operation has been issued and the types of constructions in respect of which a Design Type Certificate has been issued shall be established and kept up to date under the responsibility of the Organisation. The register shall include railway vehicles admitted according to Article 19; it may contain railway vehicles admitted for national traffic only. § 2 The data bank shall also contain a register with information concerning the competent authorities and bodies to whom competence is transferred according to Article 5 and the accredited/recognised auditors according to Article 15 § 2. § 3 The Committee of Technical Experts may decide to include other data to be used in railway operations in the data bank, such as information concerning declarations, inspections and maintenance of the admitted vehicles (including next inspection due), information on accidents and incidents and registers concerning coding of vehicles, locations, rail transport undertakings, keepers, infrastructure managers, workshops, manufacturers, entities in charge of maintenance (ECM) etc. § 4 The Committee of Technical Experts shall establish the functional and technical architecture of the data bank, as well as the necessary data, when and how the data shall be provided, what the access rights will be and other administrative and organisational provisions, including which database structure should be applied. In all cases, change of keeper, change of ECM, withdrawals from service, official immobilisations, suspensions and withdrawals of certificates, declarations or other evidence and modifications to a vehicle which derogate from the admitted type of construction shall be notified to the Secretary General without delay. § 5 When applying this Article, the Committee of Technical Experts shall consider registers set up by Contracting States and regional organisations in such a way so as to reduce undue burden on the involved parties such as regional organisations, Contracting States, competent authorities and industry. In order also to minimise the cost for the Organisation and obtain coherent register systems, all parties involved shall coordinate with the Organisation their plans and the development of registers which are within the scope of these Uniform Rules. § 6 The data registered in the data bank shall be considered as prima facie evidence of the technical admission of a railway vehicle. § 7 The Committee of Technical Experts may decide that the costs of setting up and running the data bank shall be covered, in whole or in part, by the users; supplying and amending data shall be free of charge, whereas consulting data may be subject to a fee. Article 14 Inscriptions and signs § 1 Railway vehicles admitted to operation must bear
- a)a sign, which establishes clearly that they have been admitted to operation in international traffic according to these Uniform Rules, and
- b)the other inscriptions and signs prescribed in the UTP, including a unique identification code (the vehicle number). The competent authority which grants the admission to operation is responsible for ensuring that the alphanumeric identification code is assigned to each vehicle. This code, which shall include the country code of the (first) admitting State, must be marked on each vehicle and be entered in the National Vehicle Register (NVR) of that State as required according to Article 13. § 2 The Committee of Technical Experts shall lay down the sign provided for in § 1
- a)and the transitional periods during which the railway vehicles admitted to circulation in international traffic may bear inscriptions and signs derogating from those prescribed in § 1. Article 15 Maintenance § 1 Railway vehicles and other railway material must be in a good state of maintenance in such a way that they comply with the provisions specified in the UTP and satisfy them permanently and that their condition would not in any way compromise operational safety and would not harm the infrastructure, environment and public health by their circulation or their use in international traffic. To that end, railway vehicles and other railway material must be made available for and undergo the service, inspections and maintenance as prescribed in the Maintenance File attached to the Certificate of Operation, the UTP, the special conditions of an admission pursuant to Article 7a and in the provisions contained in RID. § 2 Each railway vehicle, before it is admitted to operation or used on the network, shall have an entity in charge of maintenance (ECM) assigned to it and this entity shall be registered in the data bank referred to in Article 13. A railway undertaking, an infrastructure manager or a keeper may be an ECM. The ECM shall ensure that the vehicles for which it is in charge of maintenance are in a safe state of running by means of a system of maintenance. The ECM shall carry out the maintenance itself or make use of contracted maintenance workshops. The ECM for a freight wagon must hold a valid certificate issued by an external auditor accredited/recognised in one of the Contracting States. The Committee of Technical Experts shall adopt further detailed rules for certification and auditing of ECM, for accredited/recognised auditors, their accreditation/ recognition, the audits and audit certificates. The rules shall indicate whether they are equivalent to the criteria related to the ECM certification system adopted in the European Community or in the States which apply Community legislation as a result of international agreements with the European Community. These rules, which shall also include rules for the withdrawal and suspension of certificates and accreditations, shall be defined in an Annex to these Uniform Rules and shall form an integral part thereof. § 3 An operating railway undertaking is responsible for the safe operation of its trains and shall ensure that vehicles carried are properly maintained. Therefore, the ECM must ensure that reliable information about maintenance processes and data are available for the operating railway undertaking, and the operating railway undertaking must in due time provide the ECM with information and data concerning its operation of the vehicles and other railway material for which the ECM is in charge. In both cases the information and data in question shall be specified in the Annex indicated in § 2. § 4 The ECM of an admitted vehicle shall keep and update a Maintenance Record File for that vehicle. The file shall be available for inspection by the competent national authority. § 5 The Committee of Technical Experts may adopt guidelines or regulations on the certification and auditing of maintenance workshops and the mutual recognition of the certificates and audits. Regulations according to this paragraph shall be defined in an Annex to these Uniform Rules and shall form an integral part thereof and be published on the website of the Organisation. Article 16 Accidents, incidents and severe damage § 1 In case of accident, incident or severe damage to railway vehicles, all parties involved (the infrastructure managers, the keepers, the ECM, the railway undertakings concerned and possible others), shall be required
- a)to take, without delay, all necessary measures to ensure the safety of railway traffic, respect for the environment and public health and
- b)to establish the causes of the accident, the incident or the severe damage. 1a § The measures according to § 1 must be coordinated. Such coordination is the obligation of the infrastructure manager unless otherwise prescribed by provisions in force in the State in question. In addition to the duty of investigation placed upon the parties involved, the Contracting State may require an independent investigation to be carried out. § 2 A vehicle shall be considered severely damaged when it cannot be repaired by a simple operation which would allow it to be joined in a train and to circulate on its own wheels without danger for operations. If the repair can be carried out in less than 72 hours or the cost is less than 0.18 million SDR in total, the damage shall not be considered as severe. § 3 The accidents, incidents and severe damage shall be notified, without delay, to the authority or body which admitted the vehicle to circulation. That authority or body may require the damaged vehicle to be presented, possibly already repaired, for examination of the validity of the admission to operation which has been granted. If appropriate, the procedure concerning the grant of admission to operation must be repeated. § 4 The Contracting States shall keep records, publish investigation reports including their findings and recommendations, inform the approval certificate issuing authority and the Organisation of the causes of accidents, incidents and severe damage in international traffic that occurred on their territory. The Committee of Technical Experts may examine the causes of serious accidents and incidents or severe damage in international traffic with a view possibly to developing the construction and operation prescriptions for railway vehicles and other railway material contained in the UTP and may if appropriate decide to instruct the Contracting States within a short time limit to suspend relevant Certificates to Operation, Design Type Certificates or declarations issued. § 5 The Committee of Technical Experts may prepare and adopt further mandatory rules concerning the investigation of serious accidents, incidents and severe damage, requirements concerning independent State investigation bodies and the form and content of reports. It may also change the values/numbers in § 2 and in Article 2 ff). Article 17 Immobilisation and rejection of vehicles § 1 A competent authority, another rail transport undertaking or an infrastructure manager may not reject or immobilise railway vehicles to prevent them from running on compatible railway infrastructures if these Uniform Rules, the prescriptions contained in the UTP, the special conditions, if any, for the admission set out by the admitting authority as well as the construction and operation prescriptions contained in RID, are complied with. § 2 The right of a competent authority to inspect and immobilise a vehicle is not affected if non-compliance with § 1 is suspected, but the examination to establish certainty should be carried out as quickly as possible and in any case within 24 hours. § 3 However, if a Contracting State does not suspend or withdraw a certificate within the limit indicated according to Article 5 § 7 or Article 16 § 4, other Contracting States are entitled to reject or immobilise the vehicle(
- s)in question. Article 18 Non-compliance with the prescriptions § 1 Subject to § 2 and Article 10 a § 4 c), the legal consequences resulting from failure to comply with these Uniform Rules and the UTP, shall be regulated by the provisions in force in the Contracting State of which the competent authority has granted the first admission to operation, including the rules relating to conflict of laws. § 2 The consequences in civil and penal law resulting from failure to comply with these Uniform Rules and the UTP shall be regulated, so far as concerns the infrastructure, by the provisions in force in the Contracting State in which the infrastructure manager has his place of business, including the rules relating to conflict of laws. Article 19 Transitional provisions § 1 Article 3 § 1 applies to upgraded, renewed and existing vehicles. For vehicles which have been approved for international traffic under RIV, RIC or other pertinent international agreements and which are marked accordingly, transitional provisions are prescribed in this Article. § 2 At the time of entry into force of these Uniform Rules, existing vehicles marked with RIV or RIC as proof of current compliance with the technical provisions of the RIV 2000 agreement (revised edition of 1 January 2004) or the RIC agreement respectively, shall be deemed to be admitted to operation on the networks of the Contracting States in accordance with their compatibility with the railway infrastructures (in respect of the markings on the wagon) for which it is admitted by one of the Contracting States. § 2a Existing vehicles not marked RIV or RIC but admitted and marked according to bilateral or multilateral agreements between Contracting States notified to the Organisation shall also be deemed to be admitted to operation on the networks covered by the agreement. § 3 The transitional admission according to §§ 2 and 2a is valid until the vehicle requires a new admission according to Article 10 § 11. § 4 The inscription RIV, RIC, or another marking on the vehicle accepted by the Committee of Technical Experts, together with the data stored in the database indicated in Article 13, shall be considered as sufficient proof of the approval. Unauthorised changing of this marking shall be considered as fraud and prosecuted according to national law. § 5 Regardless of this transitional provision, the vehicle and its documentation shall comply with the provisions in force of the UTP concerning marking and maintenance; compliance with the provisions of RID in force shall also be ensured, where applicable. The Committee of Technical Experts may also decide that safety-based provisions introduced in the UTP shall be complied with within a certain deadline regardless of any transitional provisions. § 6 Existing vehicles which are not covered by the scope of §§ 2 and 2a can be admitted to operation upon the request of an applicant to a competent authority. The latter may request additional technical information from the applicant, risk analysis and/or vehicle tests before granting a complementary admission to operation. However the competent authorities shall take full account of the equivalence table referred to in Article 13 of the APTU Uniform Rules. § 7 The Committee of Technical Experts may adopt other transitional provisions. Article 20 Disputes Disputes relating to the technical admission of railway vehicles and other railway material intended to be used in international traffic, may be dealt with by the Committee of Technical Experts if there is no resolution by direct negotiation between the parties involved. Such disputes may also be submitted, in accordance with the procedure specified in Title V of the Convention, to the Arbitration Tribunal.” „Egységes Szabályok a nemzetközi vasúti forgalomban használt infrastruktúrára vonatkozó szerződésre (CUI – az Egyezmény E Függeléke) I. CÍM ÁLTALÁNOS RENDELKEZÉSEK 1. cikk Hatály 1. § A jelen Egységes Szabályok minden, a CIV Egységes Szabályoknak és a CIM Egységes Szabályoknak megfelelő, a nemzetközi fuvarozás céljára szolgáló vasúti infrastruktúra használatáról szóló szerződésre vonatkoznak. A Szabályok a szerződő felek székhelyétől és nemzetiségétől függetlenül alkalmazandók. A jelen Egységes Szabályokat akkor is alkalmazni kell, ha a vasúti infrastruktúrát államok vagy állami intézmények vagy szervezetek működtetik vagy használják. 2. § Tiszteletben tartva a 21. cikket, a jelen Egységes Szabályok más jogviszonyokra nem alkalmazandóak, például különösen:
- a)a fuvarozó vagy az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető felelősségére az alkalmazottaival vagy más személyekkel szemben, akiknek a szolgáltatásait a feladatai végrehajtása során igénybe veszi;
- b)egyrészről a fuvarozó vagy az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető, másrészről harmadik személyek egymással szembeni felelősségére. 2. cikk A testi károsodással kapcsolatos felelősségre vonatkozó nyilatkozat 1. § Bármely Tagállam bármikor kijelentheti, hogy a saját területén bekövetkező balesetek áldozataira vonatkozóan nem alkalmazza a testi károsodással (halál, sérülés vagy más testi vagy lelki ártalom) kapcsolatos felelősségre vonatkozó összes rendelkezést, amennyiben az áldozatok saját állampolgárai, vagy állandó lakóhelyük az adott államban van. 2. § Az 1. § szerinti nyilatkozatot tevő Tagállam bármikor visszavonhatja nyilatkozatát a Letéteményes értesítésével. Ez a visszavonás egy hónappal azt a napot követően lép hatályba, hogy a Letéteményes a Tagállamokat erről értesítette. 3. cikk Meghatározások A jelen Egységes Szabályok alkalmazásában
- a)„vasúti infrastruktúra”: valamennyi vasúti pálya és a vasút egyéb helyhez kötött létesítménye és berendezése, amely szükséges a vasúti járművek közlekedéséhez és a biztonságos forgalomhoz;
- b)„infrastruktúra-üzemeltető”: az a személy, aki a vasúti infrastruktúrát rendelkezésre bocsátja, és aki felelősséget vállal annak a Tagállamnak a hatályos jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, ahol az infrastruktúra található;
- c)„fuvarozó”: a CIV Egységes Szabályoknak vagy a CIM Egységes Szabályoknak megfelelő nemzetközi vasúti személy- vagy árufuvarozással foglalkozó személy, aki engedéllyel rendelkezik annak a Tagállamnak az engedélyekre és az engedélyek elismerésére vonatkozó hatályos jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, ahol a személy tevékenységét végzi;
- d)„kisegítő munkaerő”: a feladatkörükben eljáró alkalmazottak vagy más személyek, akiknek a szolgáltatásait a fuvarozó vagy az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető igénybe veszi a szerződés teljesítéséhez;
- e)„harmadik személy”: az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőn, a fuvarozón és a kisegítő munkaerőn kívüli személy;
- f)„engedély”: a fuvarozási tevékenység folytatására vonatkozó engedély a vasúti vállalkozás részére annak a Tagállamnak a hatályos jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, amely fuvarozói tevékenységét elismeri;
- g)„biztonsági tanúsítvány”: olyan okirat, amely – annak a Tagállamnak a jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, ahol az infrastruktúra található – tanúsítja, hogy a fuvarozót illetően: – a vállalat belső szervezete, valamint – az alkalmazásban álló személyzet és az infrastruktúra használata közben alkalmazott járművek megfelelnek a biztonságra vonatkozó, az adott infrastruktúrán a veszélytelen szolgáltatás biztosítását célzó követelményeknek. 4. cikk Kötelező jog Ha a jelen Egységes Szabályok nem rendelkeznek másképp, semmis minden olyan rendelkezés, amely közvetlenül vagy közvetve eltér a jelen Egységes Szabályoktól. Az ilyen rendelkezés semmissége nem vonja maga után a szerződés más rendelkezéseinek semmisségét. Mindazonáltal a Szerződő Felek vállalhatnak nagyobb felelősséget és súlyosabb kötelezettségeket, mint amilyeneket a jelen Egységes Szabályok előírnak, vagy megállapíthatják az anyagi károkra vonatkozó kártérítés legnagyobb összegét. II. CÍM HASZNÁLATI SZERZŐDÉS 5. cikk Tartalom és forma 1. § Használati szerződés szabályozza a kapcsolatokat az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető és a fuvarozó, vagy bármely olyan személy között, aki szerződéskötésre jogosult annak a Tagállamnak a jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, ahol az infrastruktúra található. 2. § A szerződés szabályozza a használat közigazgatási, műszaki és pénzügyi feltételeinek meghatározásához szükséges részletes adatokat. 3. § A szerződést írásban vagy azzal egyenértékű formában kell megkötni. Az írásos vagy azzal egyenértékű forma hiánya vagy rendellenessége, továbbá a 2. §-ban megadott valamely adat hiánya nem érinti a szerződés érvényességét, amely ilyen esetben is a jelen Egységes Szabályok hatálya alá tartozik. 5bis. cikk Továbbra is érvényes jog 1. § Az 5. cikk, valamint a 6., 7. és 22. cikk rendelkezései nem érintik azokat a kötelezettségeket, amelyek az infrastruktúra használati szerződések szerződő feleit terhelik annak a Tagállamnak a jogszabályai és előírásai szerint, ahol az infrastruktúra található, beleértve adott esetben az Európai Közösség jogszabályait. 2. § A 8. és 9. cikk rendelkezései nem érintik azokat a kötelezettségeket, amelyeket az infrastruktúra használati szerződés szerződő feleinek egy EK Tagállamban vagy egy olyan államban kell teljesíteniük, ahol a közösségi jogszabályokat alkalmazzák az Európai Közösséggel kötött nemzetközi szerződések eredményeként. 3. § Az 1. és 2. § rendelkezései vonatkoznak különösen: – a vasúti vállalkozások vagy meghatalmazott pályázók és az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetők között megkötendő megállapodásokra, – az engedélyezésre, – a biztonsági tanúsításra, – a biztosításra, – a késések és zavarok minimalizálását, valamint a vasúti hálózat teljesítményének javítását szolgáló rendszerekkel kapcsolatos díjak felszámítására, – az ügyfelek érdekét szolgáló kompenzációs intézkedésekre és – a viták feloldására. 6. cikk A fuvarozó és az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető különleges kötelezettségei 1. § A fuvarozónak a vasúti fuvarozási tevékenység folytatására engedéllyel kell rendelkeznie. Az alkalmazott személyzetnek és a használt járműveknek meg kell felelniük a biztonsági előírásoknak. Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető megkövetelheti a fuvarozótól – érvényes engedély és biztonsági tanúsítvány eredetiben vagy hiteles másolatban való bemutatásával vagy más módon – annak bizonyítását, hogy a fenti előírásokat betartja. 2. § A fuvarozó köteles tájékoztatni az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőt minden olyan eseményről, amely engedélyének, tanúsítványának vagy más bizonyítékának érvényességét érinti. 3. § Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető megkövetelheti a fuvarozótól annak bizonyítását, hogy rendelkezik felelősségbiztosítással, vagy, azzal egyenértékű intézkedést tett, annak érdekében, hogy a 9–21. cikkek szerinti, bármilyen jogcímen alapuló igénynek eleget tud tenni. A fuvarozó évente köteles hiteles formában bizonyítani, hogy felelősségbiztosítása vagy az azzal egyenértékű intézkedés még mindig fennáll; köteles továbbá írásban tájékoztatni az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőt minden azokkal kapcsolatos változásról, annak hatálybalépése előtt. 4. § A szerződő felek tájékoztatják egymást minden olyan eseményről, amely megakadályozhatja a közöttük létrejött szerződés teljesítését. 7. cikk A szerződés megszüntetése 1. § Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető azonnali hatállyal felmondhatja a használati szerződést, ha
- a)a fuvarozónak már nincs vasúti fuvarozói engedélye;
- b)az alkalmazott személyzet és a használt járművek nem felelnek meg többé a biztonsági előírásoknak;
- c)a fuvarozó fizetési hátralékban van: 1. két egymást követő fizetési időszakra és egyhavi használat ellenértékét meghaladó összegre vonatkozóan, vagy 2. két fizetési időszakot meghaladó időszakra és kéthavi használat ellenértékének megfelelő összegre vonatkozóan;
- d)a fuvarozó nyilvánvalóan megsértette a 6. cikk 2. és 3. §-ában rögzített különleges kötelezettségei valamelyikét. 2. § A fuvarozó azonnali hatállyal felmondhatja a használati szerződést, ha az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető elveszíti az adott infrastruktúrára vonatkozó üzemeltetési jogát. 3. § Bármely szerződő fél azonnali hatállyal felmondhatja a használati szerződést, ha a másik szerződő fél nyilvánvalóan nem tett eleget alapvető kötelezettségének, ha az adott kötelezettség a személyek vagy az áruk biztonságát érinti. A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak e jog gyakorlásának módjáról. 4. § Az a szerződő fél, aki a felmondásra okot adott, felel a másik félnek ebből eredő káráért, kivéve, ha bizonyítani tudja, hogy a kár nem az ő hibájából származott. 5. § A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak az 1. §
- c)és
- d)pontjában és a 4. §-ban foglalt rendelkezésektől eltérő feltételekről. III. CÍM FELELŐSSÉG 8. cikk Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető felelőssége 1. § Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető felelős
- a)a testi károsodásért (halál, személyi sérülés vagy egyéb testi vagy lelki ártalom),
- b)a dologi kárért (ingó vagy ingatlan vagyon megsemmisülése vagy károsodása),
- c)a CIV Egységes Szabályok és a CIM Egységes Szabályok alapján, a fuvarozó által fizetendő kártérítés miatt keletkezett vagyoni veszteségért, amely a fuvarozót vagy az általa igénybe vett kisegítő munkaerőt éri az infrastruktúra használata közben és az infrastruktúrából eredően. 2. § Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető mentesül a fenti felelősség alól
- a)testi károsodás és a CIV Egységes Szabályok értelmében a fuvarozó kártérítési kötelezettségből eredő vagyoni vesztesége esetén, 1. ha a kárt okozó esemény az infrastruktúra üzemeltetéséhez nem kapcsolódó körülmények miatt következett be, amelyeket az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető az adott eset körülményei által megkívánt gondosság ellenére sem kerülhetett el, és nem háríthatta el azok következményeit, 2. olyan mértékben, amilyen mértékben a kárt okozó esemény a károsult hibájának a következménye, 3. ha a kárt okozó esemény egy harmadik személy magatartásának a következménye, amelyet az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető az eset körülményei által megkövetelt gondosság ellenére sem kerülhetett el, és annak következményeit nem háríthatta el;
- b)a CIM Egységes Szabályok értelmében a fuvarozó által fizetendő kártérítésből eredő dologi kár és vagyoni veszteség esetében, ha a kár a fuvarozó hibájából vagy az általa kiadott utasításból keletkezett, amely nem tulajdonítható az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek, vagy olyan körülményekből adódott, amelyeket az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető nem kerülhetett el, és amelyek következményeit nem háríthatta el. 3. § Ha a kárt okozó esemény egy harmadik személy magatartásának következménye, és az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető ennek ellenére a 2. §
- a)pontjának értelmében, nem mentesül teljes mértékben a felelősség alól a jelen Egységes Szabályok által megállapított határig felelős anélkül, hogy a harmadik személy elleni visszkereseti joga sérülne. 4. § A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak abban, hogy az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető felel-e, és milyen mértékben a fuvarozónak a késedelemből vagy üzemzavarból eredő káráért. 9. cikk A fuvarozó felelőssége 1. § A fuvarozó felelős
- a)a testi károsodásért (halál, személyi sérülés vagy egyéb testi vagy lelki ártalom),
- b)az anyagi kárért (ingó vagy ingatlan vagyon megsemmisülése vagy károsodása), amelyet a használt szállítóeszközök, a szállított személyek vagy áruk okoztak az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek vagy az általa igénybe vett kisegítő munkaerőt éri az infrastruktúra használata közben. 2. § A fuvarozó mentesül a fenti felelősség alól
- a)testi károsodás esetén 1. ha a kárt okozó esemény a fuvarozó működésén kívül eső körülmények miatt következett be; amelyeket a fuvarozó az adott eset körülményei által megkívánt gondosság ellenére sem kerülhetett el, és nem háríthatta el azok következményeit, 2. olyan mértékben, amilyen mértékben a kárt okozó esemény a károsult hibájának a következménye, 3. ha a kárt okozó esemény egy harmadik személy magatartására vezethető vissza, amelyet a fuvarozó az eset körülményei által megkövetelt gondosság ellenére sem kerülhetett el, és annak következményeit nem háríthatta el;
- b)ha a kár az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető hibájából, vagy az általa kiadott utasításból ered, amely nem tulajdonítható a fuvarozónak, vagy olyan körülményekből adódott, amelyeket a fuvarozó nem kerülhetett el, és amelyek következményeit nem háríthatta el. 3. § Ha a kárt okozó esemény egy harmadik személy magatartásának következménye, és a fuvarozó ennek ellenére a 2. §
- a)pontjának értelmében, nem mentesül teljes mértékben a felelősség alól a jelen Egységes Szabályok által megállapított határig felelős anélkül, hogy a harmadik személy elleni visszkereseti joga sérülne. 4. § A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak abban, hogy a fuvarozó felel-e, és milyen mértékben az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek a késedelemből vagy üzemzavarból eredő káráért. 10. cikk Közösen okozott kár 1. § Ha a kárhoz az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek felróható okok és a fuvarozónak felróható okok egyaránt hozzájárultak, minden szerződő fél csak olyan mértékben felelős, amilyen mértékben a 8. és 9. cikk értelmében a neki felróható okok a kárhoz hozzájárultak. Amennyiben nem lehet megállapítani milyen mértékben járultak hozzá az egyes feleknek felróható okok a kárhoz, mindegyik fél viseli azt a kárt, amely őt érte. 2. § Az 1. § megfelelően alkalmazandó, ha a kárhoz az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek és az adott vasúti infrastruktúrát használó több fuvarozónak felróható okok is hozzájárultak. 3. § A 9. cikkben említett kár esetén az 1. § első mondata értelemszerűen alkalmazandó, ha a kárhoz több, ugyanazt az infrastruktúrát használó fuvarozónak felróható okok járultak hozzá. Ha nem lehet megállapítani, hogy az egyes fuvarozóknak felróható okok milyen mértékben járultak hozzá a kárhoz, az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetővel szemben a fuvarozók egyenlő arányban felelősek. 11. cikk Kártérítés halál esetén 1. § Halál esetén a kártérítés kiterjed:
- a)az elhalálozást követően keletkezett szükséges költségekre, különösen a holttest szállításának és a temetésnek a költségeire;
- b)ha a halál nem azonnal következett be, a 12. cikkben megállapított károkra. 2. § Ha az elhalálozás folytán olyan személyek, akiknek eltartására az elhunyt a törvény szerint kötelezett volt, vagy a jövőben kötelezett lett volna, ellátásukat elveszítették, ezért a veszteségért is kártérítés illeti őket. Olyan személyek kárára vonatkozó kereseti jogra, akiknek az elhunyt törvényes kötelezettség nélkül eltartást nyújtott, a nemzeti jog az irányadó. 12. cikk Kártérítés sérülés esetén Sérülés vagy egyéb testi vagy lelki sérelem esetében a kártérítés magába foglalja:
- a)a szükséges költségeket, különösen a gyógyítási és a szállítási költségeket;
- b)annak a vagyoni hátránynak a kompenzálását, amely a sérültet teljes vagy részleges munkaképtelensége vagy megnövekedett szükségletei folytán éri. 13. cikk Egyéb testi károsodások megtérítése A nemzeti jog irányadó arra nézve, hogy az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető vagy a fuvarozó köteles-e és milyen mértékben a 11. és 12. cikk szerinti károkon kívül más testi károkért is kártérítést nyújtani. 14. cikk A kártérítés formája és összege halál és sérülés esetében 1. § A 11. cikk 2. §-ában és a 12. cikk
- b)pontjában megállapított kártérítést átalány formájában kell teljesíteni. Ha azonban a nemzeti jog szerint járadék megállapítása lehetséges, a kártérítést ilyen formában kell teljesíteni, ha a sérült személy vagy a 11. cikk 2. §-a szerinti jogosultak kívánják. 2. § Az 1. § szerint teljesítendő kártérítés összegét a nemzeti jognak megfelelően kell megállapítani. A jelen Egységes Szabályok alkalmazásában azonban a személyenkénti felső határ 175 000 elszámolási egység átalányként, vagy ennek az összegnek megfelelő járadék, ha a nemzeti jog ennél alacsonyabb felső határt állapít meg. 15. cikk A felelősség korlátozására való hivatkozás jogának elvesztése A jelen Egységes Szabályokban, valamint a nemzeti jogban előírt felelősségi korlátozások, amelyek egy adott összegre korlátozzák a kártérítést, nem alkalmazhatók, ha bizonyított, hogy a kár olyan cselekményből vagy mulasztásból származik, amelyet a károkozó követett el akár ilyen kár előidézésének a szándékával, akár gondatlanságból, de annak tudatában, hogy ilyen kár valószínűleg bekövetkezik. 16. cikk Átszámítás és kamatozás 1. § Ha a kártérítés során külföldi pénznemben kifejezett összegeket kell átszámítani, az átszámítást a kártérítés kifizetésének napján és helyén érvényes árfolyamon kell végezni. 2. § A jogosult a kártérítés után évi ötszázalékos kamatot követelhet a békéltetési eljárás kezdeményezésének, vagy az Egyezmény V. Címében előírt Választott bírósághoz való folyamodásnak, vagy a jogi eljárás megindításának a napjától számítva. 17. cikk Felelősség nukleáris baleset esetében Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető és a fuvarozó mentesülnek a jelen Egységes Szabályok alapján az őket terhelő felelősség alól, ha a kárt nukleáris baleset okozta, és a kárért valamely Tagállamban a nukleáris energia terén fennálló felelősségre vonatkozó jogszabályok és előírások szerint a nukleáris berendezés üzemben tartója vagy az annak helyébe lépő más személy felelős. 18. cikk Felelősség a kisegítő munkaerőért Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető és a fuvarozó felelős az általuk igénybe vett kisegítő munkaerőért. 19. cikk Egyéb igények 1. § A jelen Egységes Szabályok hatálya alá tartozó minden esetben, az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetővel vagy a fuvarozóval szemben a felelősségük alapján bármilyen jogcímen keresetet csak a jelen Egységes Szabályok feltételei és korlátozásai megtartásával lehet indítani. 2. § Ugyanez vonatkozik azokra a keresetekre is, amelyeket olyan kisegítő munkaerővel szemben indítanak, akiért az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető vagy a fuvarozó a 18. cikk értelmében felelős. 20. cikk Kártérítési megállapodások A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak olyan feltételekben, amelyek alapján érvényesítik kártérítési jogaikat a másik féllel szemben, vagy lemondanak azokról. IV. CÍM A KISEGÍTŐ MUNKAERŐ ÁLTAL INDÍTOTT KERESETEK 21. cikk Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető vagy a fuvarozó elleni keresetek 1. § A fuvarozó által igénybe vett kisegítő munkaerő a felelősség tekintetében az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető ellen, az általa okozott károkra vonatkozóan bármilyen jogcímen keresetet csak a jelen Egységes Szabályokban megállapított feltételek és korlátozások megtartásával indíthat. 2. § Az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető által igénybe vett kisegítő munkaerő a felelősség tekintetében a fuvarozó ellen, az általa okozott károkra vonatkozóan, bármilyen jogcímen keresetet csak a jelen Egységes Szabályokban megállapított feltételek és korlátozások megtartásával indíthat. V. CÍM A JOGOK GYAKORLÁSA 22. cikk Békéltetési eljárás A szerződő felek megállapodhatnak békéltetési eljárásban vagy az Egyezmény V. Címében meghatározott választott bírósághoz fordulnak. 23. cikk Visszkereset A fuvarozó által a CIV Egységes Szabályok vagy a CIM Egységes Szabályok alapján fizetett kártérítés érvényességét nem lehet vitatni, ha a kártérítést bíróság állapította meg, és az infrastruktúra-üzemeltetőnek szabályos értesítés útján lehetővé tették, hogy az eljárásba beavatkozzék. 24. cikk Hatáskör 1. § A jelen Egységes Szabályok alapján kereset a szerződő felek közötti megállapodással kijelölt Tagállamok bíróságai előtt indítható. 2. § Ha a felek nem állapodnak meg ezzel ellentétesen, annak a Tagállamnak a bírósága rendelkezik joghatósággal, amelynek területén az infrastruktúra-üzemeltető székhelye van. 25. cikk Elévülés 1. § A jelen Egységes Szabályokon alapuló igények három év alatt évülnek el. 2. § Az elévülési idő azon a napon kezdődik, amelyen a kár keletkezett. 3. § Halál esetén az elévülési idő a halál napját követő naptól számított három év, de nem haladhatja meg a baleset napját követő naptól számított öt évet. 4. § Olyan személy, akinek a felelősségét megállapították, az 1. §-ban előírt elévülési idő lejárta után is indíthat visszkeresetet, ha azt annak a Tagállamnak a törvényei szerinti határidőn belül indítja, ahol az eljárás folyik. Ez a határidő azonban nem lehet kevesebb, mint kilencven nap attól a naptól számítva, amelyen a visszkeresetet indító személy elismerte az igényt, vagy az ellene indított eljárásról értesítették. 5. § Az elévülési idő szünetel, ha a felek békéltetői eljárásról állapodnak meg, vagy ha az Egyezmény V. Címében említett választott bírósághoz fordulnak. 6. § Az elévülési idő szünetelésére és félbeszakadására egyebekben a nemzeti jog az irányadó. Egységes szabályok a nemzetközi forgalomban használni tervezett vasúti berendezésekre vonatkozó műszaki szabványok érvényesítésére és egységes műszaki előírások elfogadására (APTU – az Egyezmény F függeléke) 1. cikk Hatály Jelen Egységes Szabályok a nemzetközi forgalomban használni tervezett vasúti berendezésekre vonatkozó műszaki szabványok érvényesítésének és egységes műszaki előírások (EME) elfogadásának az eljárásait állapítják meg. 2. cikk Meghatározások Jelen Egységes Szabályok és mellékleteik és az egységes műszaki előírások (EME) értelmében, az ATMF (Egységes Szabályok a nemzetközi forgalomban használt vasúti berendezések műszaki engedélyezésére) 2. cikkében meghatározott fogalmakon kívül, az alábbi fogalmak a következőket jelentik:
- a)„személykocsi”: vonóerő kifejtésére nem alkalmas, utasszállításra szolgáló vasúti jármű; a fogalom jelenti a személyszállító vonat részeként beállított poggyászkocsit is;
- b)„előrehaladott stádiumban lévő projekt”: bármely projekt, amelynek tervezési/kivitelezési szakasza elérte azt a pontot, ahol a műszaki paraméterek megváltoztatása elfogadhatatlan lenne az érintett Tagállam részére; az akadály – jellegét tekintve – lehet jogi, szerződéssel összefüggő, gazdasági, pénzügyi, társadalmi vagy környezettel kapcsolatos, amelyet megfelelően indokolni kell;
- c)„csere karbantartás keretében”: alkotó elemek cseréje azonos funkciójú és teljesítményű alkatrésszel, megelőző vagy javítási célú karbantartás során;
- d)„műszaki előírás”: az egységes műszaki előírásokban szereplő, műszaki szabványnak nem minősülő, gyártásra, üzemeltetésre, karbantartásra, biztonsági szempontokra vagy más, vasúti berendezéssel kapcsolatos eljárásra vonatkozó szabály;
- e)„műszaki szabvány”: elismert nemzetközi szabványügyi testület által, saját eljárásai alapján elfogadott, nem kötelező szabvány;
- f)„vontató jármű”: vonóerő kifejtésére alkalmas vasúti jármű;
- g)„teherkocsi”: vonóerő kifejtésére nem alkalmas, áruszállításra szolgáló vasúti jármű. 3. cikk Cél 1. § A vasúti berendezésre vonatkozó műszaki szabványok érvényesítése és az egységes műszaki előírások elfogadása azzal a céllal történik, hogy
- a)elősegítse a járművek szabad közlekedését és más vasúti berendezések szabad felhasználását a nemzetközi forgalomban;
- b)hozzájáruljon a nemzetközi forgalom biztonságossá, megbízhatóvá, és elérhetővé tételéhez;
- c)a környezetvédelem és közegészségügy kérdéseit figyelembe vegye. 2. § A vasúti járművekre vonatkozó műszaki szabványok érvényesítésénél és az egységes műszaki előírások elfogadásánál kizárólag a nemzetközi szinten kidolgozott szabványok és eljárások vehetők figyelembe. 3. § Amennyire csak lehetséges
- a)biztosítani kell műszaki rendszerek és a nemzetközi forgalomhoz szükséges alkatrészek kölcsönös alkalmazhatóságát;
- b)a műszaki szabványoknak és az egységes műszaki előírásoknak – indokolt esetben változatokkal is – megvalósíthatóságot kell szolgálnia. 4. cikk A műszaki szabványok és az egységes műszaki előírások kidolgozása 1. § A vasúti berendezésre vonatkozó műszaki szabványok kidolgozása, valamint az ipari termékek és eljárások szabványosítása az elismert országos és nemzetközi szabványügyi szervek feladata. 2. § Az EME elkészítése a Műszaki Szakértői Bizottság feladata, amelyet megfelelő munkacsoportok és a Főtitkár segítenek a 6. cikknek megfelelően benyújtott kérelmek alapján. 5. cikk A műszaki szabványok érvényesítése 1. § A Műszaki Szakértői Bizottság dönt a műszaki szabványnak vagy meghatározott részeinek az Egyezmény 16., 20. cikkében és a 33. cikk 6. §-ában rögzített eljárás szerinti érvényesítése tárgyában. Döntéseik az Egyezmény 35. cikk 3. és 4. §-a szerint lépnek hatályba. 2. § Egy műszaki szabvány engedélyezésére vonatkozó kérelmet benyújthatja:
- a)bármely Tagállam;
- b)az ATMF 2x) cikkében meghatározott bármely regionális szervezet;
- c)bármely országos vagy nemzetközi szabványügyi testület, amely a vasút szabványosításának feladatával meg van bízva, a 3. cikk 2. §-ának figyelembe vételével;
- d)bármely nemzetközi képviseleti szövetség, amelynek tagjai számára – tevékenységük folytatása során – a vasúti anyagra vonatkozó műszaki szabványok elengedhetetlenül fontosak, biztonsági és gazdaságossági okokból. 3. § Az érvényesített műszaki szabványokra vonatkozó hivatkozásokat a Főtitkár teszi közzé a Szervezet honlapján. Amint a hivatkozás megjelenik, e műszaki szabvány alkalmazása feltételezi a megfelelő EME betartását. 4. § Az érvényesített műszaki szabványok alkalmazása önkéntes; azonban a szabvány vagy annak valamely része – EME-rendelkezéssel – kötelezővé tehető. 6. cikk Egységes műszaki előírások elfogadása 1. § A Műszaki Szakértői Bizottság dönt az egységes műszaki előírás vagy az azt módosító/kiegészítő rendelkezés elfogadásáról az Egyezmény 16., 20. cikkében és a 33. cikk 6. §-ában rögzített eljárás szerint. Döntései az Egyezmény 35. cikk 3. és 4. §-a szerint lépnek hatályba. 2. § Egységes műszaki előírás vagy az azt módosító/kiegészítő rendelkezés elfogadása iránti kérelmet nyújthat be:
- a)bármely Tagállam;
- b)az ATMF 2x) cikkében meghatározott bármely regionális szervezet;
- c)bármely nemzetközi képviseleti szövetség, amelynek tagjai számára – tevékenységük folytatása során – a vasúti anyagra vonatkozó egységes műszaki előírások elengedhetetlenül fontosak, biztonsági és gazdasági okokból. 7. cikk Kérelmek benyújtása Az 5. és a 6. cikkben ismertetett kérelmeket – a Műszaki Szakértői Bizottságnak címezve – a Főtitkárnak kell benyújtani valamelyik munkanyelven az Egyezmény 1. cikk 6. §-ának megfelelően. A Műszaki Szakértői Bizottság elutasíthatja a kérelmet, ha úgy ítéli meg, hogy az nem teljes körű, nem egységes, nem megfelelően indokolt vagy alátámasztott. A kérelemnek tartalmaznia kell a társadalmi, gazdasági és környezeti következményekről készült hatásvizsgálatot. 7. cikk
- a)pont Következmények hatásvizsgálata 1. § A Műszaki Szakértői Bizottság a kérelmező indokolásának figyelembe vételével hozza meg döntését. 2. § A hatásvizsgálat jelzi az összes Tagállamra, az üzemeltetőkre és más érintett releváns szereplőkre gyakorolt lehetséges hatást. Ha a javaslatnak a javaslatban közvetlenül kifejezett szándéktól eltérő hatása van az EME-re, ezeket az interfészeket is figyelembe kell venni. 3. § Minden érdekelt szervezetnek részt kell vennie a hatásvizsgálatban a szükséges adatok ingyenes átadásával, kivéve, ha azokat szerzői jog védi. 8. cikk EME 1. § Az elfogadott EME-t a Szervezet honlapján kell nyilvánosságra hozni. 2. § Elvben minden alrendszerre egy EME vonatkozik. Ahol ez releváns, egy alrendszerre vonatkozhat több EME, illetve egy EME vonatkozhat több alrendszerre is. 2a. § Az EME-t alkalmazni kell az új alrendszerekre. Von