← Malta

L.S. 370.15 Regolamenti dwar l-Att dwar Servizzi ta' Investiment (Reviżjoni Superviżorja)

Obsah (11)Article 4Article 5Article 450Article 23Article 101Article 67Article 91Article 98Article 73Article 92Article 2

ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 1 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) REGULATIONS 24th January, 2014 LEGAL NOTICE 30

2014, as amended by Legal Notices 299

2015, 30

2022, 71

2023 and 252

2024. 1.

(1)The title

these regulations is the Investment Services Act (Supervisory Review) Regulations, 2013.

(2)The purpose

these regulations is to transpose articles 3 (in part), 4

(1), 6, 7, 50, 52, 53
(2), 56, 57, 58
(1), 58
(3), 59, 60, 61, 74
(4), 75
(1), 75
(3), 77
(2), 78
(2), 78
(3), 78
(4), 78
(5), 86
(3), 91
(6), 91
(11), 97, 98, 99, 100 to 105 inclusive, 107, 110, 143, 144, 151, 157, 159, 159a

the CRD. 2.

(1)requires: In these regulations, unless the context otherwise "the Act" means the Investment Services Act; Citation and purpose. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022. Interpretation. Amended by: L.N. 71

2023.; L.N. 252

  1. Cap.
  2. "CRD" means Directive 2013/36/EU

the European Parliament and

the Council

26 June 2013 on access to the activity

credit institutions and the prudential supervision

credit institutions, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/ EC and 2006/49/EC, as amended from time to time, and includes any implementing measures that have been or may be issued thereunder; "credit institution" means a person licensed in terms

the Banking Act, whose head

fice is in Malta or an undertaking whose business is to receive deposits or other repayable funds from the public and to grant credits for its own account, authorised by a European Regulatory Authority in terms

the CRD or authorised by a European regulatory authority in an EEA Member State; "CRR" means Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013

the European Parliament and

the Council

26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation Mi FIDU) No. 648/2012, as amended from time to time, and includes any implementing measures that have been or may be issued thereunder; "DORA Regulation" means Regulation (EU) 2022/2554

the European Parliament and

the Council

14 December 2022 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector, and amending Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009, (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 600/ 2014, (EU) No 909/2014 and (EU) 2016/1011, as may be amended from time to time, and includes any binding legal instruments, guidelines and other measures that have been or may be issued thereunder; "EBA" means the European Banking Authority established by Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010

the European Parliament and

the Council

the 24 November 2010; Cap. 371. 2 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) "EIOPA" means the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority as established by Regulation (EU) No. 1093/ 2 0 10

th e E u r op e a n P a r l ia m e n t an d o f t h e C o un c i l o f 2 4 November, 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority; "ESCB central banks" shall have the same meaning as that assigned to it in point 45

Article 4

(1)

the CRR; "ESFS" means European System

Financial Supervision; "ESRB" means the European Systemic Risk Board established by regulation EU No. 1092/2010; "European investment firm" means a firm as defined in article 4

(1)
(2)

the CRR, authorised by its European regulatory authority within the meaning

Article 5

the MiFID Directive, or authorised by a European regulatory authority in an EEA State; "home member state" means (a) in the case

an investment firm, within the meaning

these regulations, Malta; (b) in the case

a "European investment firm", within the meaning

these regulations, the Member State where such European investment Firm is authorised by its European regulatory authority; S.L. 370.10 "host member state" means a Member State or an EEA State where an investment firm has established a branch or provides services on a cross border basis in terms

the European Passport Rights for Investment Firms Regulations; "investment firm" means a person who holds an investment services licence issued by the competent authority under the Act, and which is subject to the requirements

the CRD; "third country" means a country which is not a Member State or an EEA State.

(2)Words and expressions used in these regulations which are also used in the Act shall have the same meaning assigned to them as in the Act. Designation and powers

the competent authority. Cap. 330. 3.

(1)The Malta Financial Services Authority established by the Malta Financial Services Authority Act shall be the designated competent authority in Malta for the purposes

implementing the relevant provisions

the CRD and the CRR and any reference in these regulations to the competent authority shall be read and construed accordingly.

(2)The competent authority shall exercise all the functions, obligations and powers pursuant to the CRD and the CRR and shall satisfy all the requirements imposed on competent authorities by the CRD and the CRR. Co-operation within the European system

financial supervision. 4. In the exercise

its duties, the competent authority shall take into account the convergence in respect

supervisory tools and supervisory practices in the application

the laws, regulations and administrative requirements adopted pursuant to the CRD and the CRR. For that purpose, the competent authority: INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 (a) as party to the ESFS shall cooperate with trust and full mutual respect, in particular when ensuring the flow

appropriate and reliable information between the other parties to the ESFS in accordance with the principle

sincere cooperation set out in Article 4

(3)

the Treaty on European Union; (b) shall participate in the activities

the EBA and, as appropriate, in the colleges

supervisors; (c) shall make every effort to comply with those guidelines and recommendations issued by the EBA in accordance with Article 16

Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010 and to respond to the warnings and recommendations issued by the ESRB pursuant to Article 16

Regulation (EU) No. 1092/2010; (

  1. d)shall cooperate closely with the ESRB; (
  2. e)shall not be inhibited by other national legislative provisions in the performance

its duties as member

the EBA and the ESRB, or its duties under the CRD and the CRR. 5. The competent authority shall, in the exercise

its general duties, duly consider the potential impact

its decisions on the stability

the financial system in the other Member States concerned and, in particular, in emergency situations, based on the information available at the relevant time. Union dimension

supervision. 6.

(1)The competent authority shall collaborate closely with European regulatory authorities in order to supervise the activities

investment firms and operating in particular through a branch, in one or more Member States other than Malta. The competent authority shall supply all information concerning the management and ownership

such investment firms to the relevant European regulatory authorities in the Member States concerned, that is likely to facilitate their supervision and the examination

the conditions for their licensing, and all information likely to facilitate the monitoring

investment firms, in particular with regard to liquidity, solvency, the limiting

large exposures, other factors that may influence the systemic risk posed by the investment firm, administrative and accounting procedures and internal control mechanisms. Collaboration concerning supervision.

(2)The competent authority shall provide the European regulatory authorities

the host Member State immediately with any information and findings pertaining to liquidity supervision in accordance with Part Six

the CRR and the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations,

the activities performed by an investment firm through its branches, to the extent that such information and findings are relevant to the protection

investors in the host Member State.

(3)The competent authority shall inform the European regulatory authorities

all the investment firms’ host Member States immediately where liquidity stress occurs or can reasonably be expected to occur. That information shall also include details about the planning and implementation

a recovery plan and S.L. 371.15 3 4 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) about any prudential supervisory measures taken in that context.

(4)(a) Where Malta is the home member state

the investment firm, the competent authority shall communicate and explain upon request to the European regulatory authorities

the host Member State

that investment firms’ branch, how information and findings provided by the latter have been taken into account. (b) Where the competent authority disagrees with the measures to be taken by the European regulatory authority

the host Member State in relation to the information and findings referred to in paragraph (a), the competent authority may refer the matter to the EBA and request its assistance in accordance with Article 19

Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010. (c) Where Malta is the host member state

a branch belonging to a European investment firm and the competent authority, following communication by the European regulatory authority

the said European investment firm,

information and findings relating to the said European investment firm, maintains that no appropriate measures have been taken by the said European regulatory authority, the competent authority may, after informing the European regulatory authority concerned and the EBA, take appropriate measures to prevent further breaches in order to protect the interests

investors and others to whom services are provided or to protect the stability

the financial system.

(5)The competent authority may refer to the EBA situations where a request for collaboration to a European regulatory authority, in particular to exchange information, has been rejected or has not been acted upon within a reasonable time.
(6)The competent authority may exchange information with the bodies listed and in the manner specified in Schedule V for the better carrying out

its supervisory functions in accordance with the CRD and the CRR: Provided that the information received or exchanged by the competent authority or by its

ficers, employees or agents as well as inspectors, auditors and experts engaged by the competent authority, from the bodies listed in the said Schedule, shall be treated as confidential and protected by the duty

professional secrecy. On the spot checks and inspection

branches in another Member State. 7.

(1)Where a European investment firm carries out its activities through a branch in Malta, the competent authority may permit the European regulatory authority

the home Member State concerned, after it has notified the competent authority, to carry out, itself or through an intermediary appointed for that purpose, on-the-spot checks

the information referred to in regulation 6 and inspections

such branches. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15

(2)For the purposes

sub-regulation

(1), the European regulatory authority may request the competent authority to carry out the on-the-spot checks referred to in the said sub-regulation on its behalf, in accordance with the procedures set out in regulation 12

the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations. S.L. 371.15

(3)The competent authority may carry out, on a case-by-case basis, on-the-spot checks and inspections

the activities carried out by branches

European investment firms in Malta and require information from a branch about its activities and for supervisory purposes, where it considers it relevant for reasons

stability

the financial system in Malta. Before carrying out such checks and inspections, the competent authority shall consult the European regulatory authority

the home Member State concerned.

(4)On-the-spot checks and inspections

branches when carried out in Malta shall be conducted in accordance with the laws

Malta.

(5)After the checks and inspections referred to in subregulation
(4), the competent authority shall communicate to the European regulatory authority

the home Member State, the information obtained and findings that are relevant for the risk assessment

the investment firm or the stability

the financial system in Malta.

(6)When determining the supervisory examination programme referred to in regulation 13, the competent authority shall duly take into account the information and findings provided by the European regulatory authority

a host Member State pursuant to its on-thespot checks and inspections

the activities carried out by branches

investment firms, and shall also have regard to the stability

the financial system in the host Member State concerned: Provided that the European regulatory authority may also, for the purposes

the inspection

branches, have recourse to one

the other procedures set out in regulation 12

the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations. 8. (Deleted by Legal Notice 299

2015). 9.

(1)The competent authority shall collect the information disclosed publicly by investment firms in relation to points (g), (h) and (i)

Article 450

(1)

the CRR as well as the information provided by investment firms on the gender pay gap and shall use that information to benchmark remuneration trends and practices. The competent authority shall provide this information to the EBA.

(2)The competent authority shall collect information on the number

natural persons per investment firm that are remunerated EUR 1 million or more per financial year, in pay brackets

€1 million, including data on their work responsibilities, the business area involved and the main elements

their salary, including bonuses, long-service awards and pension contributions, and shall forward this information to the EBA. S.L. 371.15 Recovery and resolution plans. Oversight

remuneration. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022. 5 6 [ S.L.370.15 Supervisory benchmarking

internal approaches. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) 10.

(1)Where the competent authority chooses to develop specific portfolios

internal approaches permitted to be used by investment firms, it shall do so in consultation with the EBA and shall en sure that in vestm ent f irm s report the result s o f the calculations for these specific portfolios separately from the results

the calculations for the benchmark portfolios required under Article 78

the CRD.

(2)The competent authority shall, on the basis

the information submitted by investment firms, monitor the range

risk weighted exposure amounts or own funds requirements, as applicable, except for operational risk, for the exposures or transactions in the benchmark portfolio resulting from the internal approaches

those investment firms. The competent authority shall make an assessment at least annually

the quality

those approaches paying particular attention to: (

  1. a)those approaches that exhibit significant differences in own fund requirements for the same exposure; (
  2. b)approaches where there is particularly high or low diversity, and also where there is a significant and systematic under-estimation

own funds requirements.

(3)Where particular investment firms diverge significantly from the majority

their peers or where there is little commonality in approach leading to a wide variance

results, the competent authority shall investigate the reasons therefor and, if it can be clearly identified that an investment firm’s approach leads to an underestimation

own funds requirements which is not attributable to differences in the underlying risks

the exposures or positions, the competent authority shall take corrective action.

(4)The competent authority shall ensure that its decisions on the appropriateness

corrective actions as referred to in subregulation

(3)comply with the principle that such actions must maintain the objectives

an internal approach and therefore do not: (

  1. a)lead to standardisation or preferred methods; (
  2. b)create wrong incentives; or (
  3. c)cause herd behaviour. Supervisory review and evaluation. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022; L.N. 252

2024. 11.

(1)The competent authority shall, taking into account the technical criteria set out in Schedule I, review the arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms implemented by investment firms to comply with the CRR, the Act, regulations or Investment Services Rules issued thereunder and evaluate: (a) risks to which investment firms are or might be exposed; (b) risks revealed by stress testing taking into account the nature, scale and complexity

an investment firm’s activities; and (c) risks revealed by digital operational resilience testing in INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 accordance with Chapter IV

the DORA Regulation.

(2)The scope

the review and evaluation referred to in subregulation

(1)shall cover all requirements

the CRR, the Act, regulations or Investment Services Rules issued thereunder.

(3)On the basis

the review and evaluation referred to in subregulation

(1), the competent authority shall determine whether the arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms implemented by investment firms and the own funds and liquidity held by them ensure a sound management and coverage

their risks.

(4)The competent authority shall establish the frequency and intensity

the review and evaluation referred to in sub-regulation

(1)having regard to the size, systemic importance, nature, scale and complexity

the activities

the investment firm concerned and taking into account the principle

proportionality. The review and evaluation shall be updated at least on an annual basis for investment firms covered by the supervisory examination programme referred to in regulation 13: Provided that when conducting the review and evaluation referred to in sub-regulation

(1), the competent authority shall apply the principle

proportionality in accordance with the criteria disclosed pursuant to Regulation 21

(1)(c). (4A) The competent authority may tailor the methodologies for the application

the review and evaluation referred to in subregulation

(1)to take into account investment firms with a similar risk profile, such as similar business models or geographical location

exposures. Such tailored methodologies may include risk-oriented benchmarks and quantitative indicators, shall allow for due consideration

the specific risks that each investment firm may be exposed to, and shall not affect the institution-specific nature

measures imposed in accordance with paragraph 1

Schedule III: Provided that where the competent authority uses tailored methodologies pursuant to this paragraph, it shall notify the EBA.

(5)Where a review shows that an investment firm may pose systemic risk in accordance with the EBA’s technical criteria for the identification and measurement

systemic risk established in terms

Article 23

Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010, the competent authority shall inform the EBA without delay about the results

the review.

(6)Where a review, in particular the evaluation

governance arrangements, the business model, or the activities

an investment firm, gives the competent authority reasonable grounds to suspect that, in connection with that investment firm, money laundering or terrorist financing is being or has been committed or attempted, or there is increased risk thereof, the competent authority shall immediately notify the EBA and the authority or body that supervises the investment firm in accordance with Directive (EU) 2015/849 and is competent for ensuring compliance with the said Directive. In the event

potential increased risk

money laundering or terrorist financing, the competent authority and the 7 8 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) authority or body that supervises the investment firm in accordance with Directive (EU) 2015/849 and is competent for ensuring compliance with the said Directive shall liaise and notify their common assessment immediately to the EBA. The competent authority shall take the necessary measures, as it deems appropriate, in accordance with the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law. Criteria for supervisory review and evaluation.

  1. In carrying out its supervisory review and evaluation the competent authority shall apply the technical and other criteria set out in Schedule I. Supervisory examination programme.
  2. The competent authority shall adopt an annual supervisory examination programme for the investment firms it supervises. Such programme shall take into account the supervisory review and evaluation process referred to in regulation 11, and shall contain the elements set out in Schedule II. Supervisory stress testing.
  3. The competent authority shall carry out as appropriate but at least annually, supervisory stress tests on investment firms it supervises, to facilitate the review and evaluation process under regulation
  4. Ongoing review

permission to use internal approaches. 15.

(1)The competent authority shall review on a regular basis, and at least every three years, investment firms’ compliance with the requirements regarding approaches that require permission by the competent authority for the calculation

own funds requirements in accordance with Part Three

the CRR. In this regard it shall take cognizance

changes in an investment firm’s business and to the implementation

those approaches to new products. Where material deficiencies are identified in risk capture by an investment firm’s internal approach, the competent authority shall ensure they are rectified or take appropriate steps to mitigate their consequences, including by imposing higher multiplication factors, or imposing capital add-ons, or taking other appropriate and effective measures.

(2)The competent authority shall in particular review and assess whether the investment firm uses well developed and up-todate techniques and practices for those approaches.
(3)If for an internal market risk model numerous overshootings as referred to in Article 366

the CRR indicate that the model is not or is no longer sufficiently accurate, the competent authority shall revoke the permission for using the internal model or impose appropriate measures to ensure that the model is improved promptly.

(4)If an investment firm has received permission from the competent authority to apply an approach for the calculation

own funds requirements in accordance with Part Three

the CRR but no longer meets the requirements for applying that approach, the competent authority shall require the investment firm to either demonstrate to the satisfaction

the competent authority that the effect

non-compliance is immaterial, where applicable in accordance with the requirements

the CRR, or present a plan for the timely restoration

compliance with the requirements and set a deadline for its implementation. The competent authority shall INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 require improvements to that plan if it is unlikely to result in full compliance or if the deadline is inappropriate. If the investment firm is unlikely to be able to restore compliance within an appropriate deadline and, where applicable, has not satisfactorily demonstrated that the effect

non-compliance is immaterial, the permission to use the approach shall be revoked or limited to compliant areas or those where compliance can be achieved within an appropriate deadline.

(5)The competent authority shall take into account the analysis carried out by the EBA in terms

Article 101

(5)

the CRD and the guidelines containing benchmarks on the basis

that analysis issued by the EBA, for the review

the permissions it grants to investment firms to use internal approaches for the calculations

own funds requirements. 16.

(1)The competent authority shall require an investment firm to take the necessary measures at an early stage to address relevant problems in circumstances where: Supervisory measures. (a) the investment firm does not meet the requirements

the Act, regulations or Investment Services Rules issued thereunder, transposing the requirements

the CRD or

the CRR; (b) the competent authority has evidence that the investment firm is likely to breach the Act, regulations or Investment Services Rules issued thereunder, or the provisions

the CRR, within the following twelve months.

(2)For the purposes

sub-regulation

(1), the powers

the competent authority shall include those contained in Schedule III. 17. (Deleted by: L.N. 30

2022). 18.

(1)For the purposes

determining the appropriate level

liquidity requirements on the basis

the review and evaluation carried out in accordance with these regulations, the competent authority shall assess whether any imposition

a specific liquidity requirement is necessary to capture liquidity risks to which an investment firm is or might be exposed, taking into account the following: (a) the particular business model

the investment firm; (

  1. b)the investment firm’s arrangements, processes and mechanisms in relation to liquidity risk as referred to in the Investment services Rules and these regulations; (
  2. c)the outcome

the review and evaluation carried out in accordance with regulation 11; (d) (Deleted by L.N. 30

2022).

(2)In particular, without prejudice to the provisions

the Act, the regulations and the Investment Services Rules transposing the Application

supervisory measures to institutions with similar risk profiles. Specific liquidity requirements. 9 10 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) requirements

Article 67

the CRD, the competent authority will consider the need to apply administrative penalties or other administrative measures, including prudential charges, proportionate to the disparity between the actual liquidity position

an investment firm and any liquidity and stable f unding requirements established by the competent authority or at European Union level.

(3)The competent authority shall monitor developments in relation to liquidity risk profiles, for example, product design and volumes, risk management, funding policies and funding concentrations.
(4)The competent authority shall take effective action where developments referred to in sub-regulation
(2)may lead to systemic instability or instability

the investment firm itself.

(5)The competent authority shall inform the EBA about any actions carried out pursuant to sub-regulation
(3). Notification to EBA by the competent authority. 19. The competent authority shall inform the EBA

: (a) the functioning

its review and evaluation process referred to in regulation 11; (b) the methodology used to reach decisions in relation to the technical criteria for supervisory review contained in Schedule I, the supervisory stress testing in regulation 14, the review

internal approaches in regulation 15, the supervisory measures in regulation 16, the supervisory powers contained in Schedule III and the specific liquidity requirements in regulation 18, when engaging in this process. Review and evaluation and application

supervisory measures. Amended by: L.N. 71

2023. 20.

(1)The competent authority shall apply the review and evaluation process and the supervisory measures referred to in these regulations in accordance with the level

application

the requirements

Part One, Title II

the CRR. Publication. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022. 21.

(1)The competent authority shall publish the following information in accordance with the Commission technical standards adopted:
(2)Repealed by Legal Notice 71

2023. (a) the texts

laws, regulations, administrative rules and general guidance adopted in Malta in the field

prudential regulation; (b) the general criteria and methodologies it uses in the review and evaluation pursuant to regulation 11, including the criteria for applying the principle

proportionality as referred to in regulation 11

(4); (c) the manner

exercise

the options and discretions available in European Union law; (d) without prejudice to the confidentiality provisions

the Act, aggregate statistical data on key aspects

the implementation

the prudential framework in Malta, INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 11 including the number and nature

supervisory measures taken and

administrative penalties imposed in terms

the Act.

(2)The information published in accordance with subregulation
(1)shall be sufficient to enable a meaningful comparison

the approaches adopted by the European regulatory authorities. The disclosures shall be published following a common format and updated regularly. The disclosures shall be accessible at a single electronic location. 22. For the purpose

Part Five

the CRR relating to exposures to transferred credit risks, the competent authority shall publish the information set out in Schedule IV. Publication

information relating to exposures to transferred credit risks. 23. In encouraging certain investment firms to develop internal credit risk assessment capacity and to increase use

internal ratings based approach for calculating own funds requirements, the competent authority shall monitor, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity

the investment firms’ activities, that such investment firms do not solely or mechanistically rely on external credit ratings for assessing the creditworthiness

an entity or financial instrument. Reliance on credit ratings for the purposes

assessing creditworthiness

an entity or financial instrument. 24. The competent authority shall inform the EBA

any authorisations it issues to the members

an investment firm’s management body to hold one additional non-executive directorship in terms

Article 91

the CRD. Notification to the EBA. 25. The competent authority shall collect the information disclosed in accordance with Article 435

(2)(c)

the CRR and shall use it to benchmark diversity practices. The competent authority shall provide that information to the EBA. Benchmarking

diversity practices by the competent authority. 26. The competent authority, when processing personal data for the purposes

the CRD, shall do so in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC and, where relevant, with Regulation (EC) No. 45/2001. Data protection. 27. The provisions

regulation 6, shall not apply until the date on which th e li qui dit y co verag e requi rem ent becom es applicable in accordance with a delegated act adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 460

the CRR in accordance with Article 151

the CRD: Applicability

regulation 6. Provided that until the date referred to in this regulation, the provisions

regulation 6 shall be substituted with the following: "The competent authority shall collaborate closely in order to supervise the activities

investment firms and operating, in particular through a branch, in one or more Member States other than Malta. The competent authority shall supply all information concerning the management and ownership

such investment firms to the relevant European Regulatory authorities in the Member states concerned, that is likely to facilitate 12 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) their supervision and the examination

the conditions for their licensing, and all information likely to facilitate the monitoring

such investment firms, in particular with regard to liquidity, solvency, the limiting

large exposures, administrative and accounting procedures and internal control mechanisms. Applicability

regulation

  1. The provisions

regulation 7 shall not apply until the date on which the liquidity coverage requirement becomes applicable in accordance with a delegated act adopted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 460

the CRR in accordance with Article 151

the CRD: Provided that until the date referred to in this regulation, the provisions

regulation 7 shall be substituted with the following: "

(1)Where a European investment firm carries out its activities through a branch in Malta, the competent authority may permit the European regulatory authority

the home Member State concerned, after it has notified the competent authority, to carry out, itself or through an intermediary, on-the-spot checks

the information referred to in regulation 6

these regulations. S.L. 371.157

(2)The European regulatory authority

the European investment firm referred to in sub-regulation

(1)may also, for the purposes

the inspection

branches have recourse to one

the other procedures set out in regulation 12

the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations.

(3)Transitory provision. Added by: L.N. 30

2022. The provisions

sub-regulations

(1)and
(2)shall not affect the right

the competent authority to carry out in the discharge

its responsibilities under the CRD, on-the-spot checks

branches established in Malta. 29.

(1)Parent financial holding companies and parent mixed financial holding companies already existing on 27 June 2019 shall apply for approval in accordance with Article 10CA

the Investment Services Act by 28 June 2021. If a financial holding company or mixed financial holding company fails to apply for approval by 28 June 2021, appropriate measures shall be taken pursuant to Article 10CA

(6)

the Investment Services Act.

(2)During the transitional period referred to in the previous subregulation, the competent authority shall have all the necessary supervisory powers conferred on it by the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law with regard to financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies subject to approval in accordance with Article 10CA

the Investment Services Act for the purposes

consolidated supervision. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) Substituted by: L.N. 30

2022. [ S.L.370.15 13 SCHEDULE I SUPERVISORY REVIEW AND EVALUATION (Regulation 11)

(1)In addition to credit, market and operational risks, the review and evaluation performed by the competent authority pursuant to regulation 11 shall include at least: (a) the results

the stress test carried out in accordance with Article 177

the CRR by investment firms applying an internal ratings based approach to calculate their credit risk-weighted exposure; (b) the exposure to and management

concentration risk by investment firms including their compliance with the Investment Services Rules transposing the requirements

the CRD and the requirements set out in Part Four

the CRR; (c) the robustness, suitability and manner

application

the policies and procedures implemented by investment firms for the management

the residual risk associated with the use

recognised credit risk mitigation techniques; (d) the extent to which the own funds held by an investment firm in respect

assets which it has securitised are adequate having regard to the economic substance

the transaction, including the degree

risk transfer achieved; (e) the exposure to, measurement and management

liquidity risk by investment firms including the development

alternative scenario analyses, the management

risk mitigants (in particular the level, composition and quality

liquidity buffers) and effective contingency plans; (f) the impact

diversification effects and how such effects are factored into the risk measurement system; (g) the results

stress tests carried out by investment firms using an internal model to calculate market risk own funds requirements under Part Three, Title IV

Chapter 5

the CRR; (h) the geographical location

investment firm’s exposures; (i) the business model

the investment firm;

(2)For the purposes

point (e)

paragraph 1

this Schedule, the competent authority shall regularly carry out a comprehensive assessment

the overall liquidity risk management by investment firms and promote the development

sound internal methodologies. In its review, the competent authority shall have regard to the role played by investment firms in the financial markets. The competent authority shall also duly consider the potential impact

their decisions on the stability

the financial system in all other Member States concerned.

(3)The competent authority shall monitor whether an investment firm has provided implicit support to a securitisation. If an investment firm is found to have provided implicit support on more than one occasion the competent authority shall take 14 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) appropriate measures reflective

the increased expectation that it will provide future support to its securitisation thus failing to achieve a significant transfer

risk.

(4)For the purposes

the determination to be made under regulation 11

(3), the competent authority shall consider whether the valuation adjustments taken for positions or portfolios in the trading book, as set out in Article 105

the CRR, enable the investment firm to sell or hedge out its positions within a short period without incurring material losses under normal market conditions.

(5)
(1)The review and evaluation performed by the competent authority shall include the exposure

investment firms to the interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities.

(2)The supervisory powers shall be exercised at least in the following cases: (a) where an investment firm’s economic value

equity as referred to in Article 84

(1)

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law declines by more than 15%

its Tier 1 capital as a result

a sudden and unexpected change in interest rates as set out in any

the six supervisory shock scenarios applied to interest rates; (b) where an investment firm’s net interest income referred to in Article 84

(1)

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law experiences a large decline as a result

a sudden and unexpected change in interest rates as set out in any

the two supervisory shock scenarios applied to interest rates.

(3)Notwithstanding sub-paragraph
(2)

paragraph

(5), the competent authority shall not be obliged to exercise supervisory powers where it considers, based on the review and evaluation referred to in this paragraph, that the investment firm’s management

interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities is adequate and that the investment firm is not excessively exposed to interest rate risk arising from nontrading book activities.

(4)For the purpose

this paragraph, the term "supervisory powers" means the powers referred to in paragraph 1

Schedule III or the power to specify modelling and parametric assumptions, other than those identified by the EBA pursuant to point (b)

paragraph 5a

Article 98

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law, to be reflected by investment firms in their calculation

the economic value

equity under Article 84

(1)

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law.

(5)The review and evaluation performed by the competent authority shall include the exposure

investment firms to the risk

excessive leverage as reflected by indicators

excessive leverage, including the leverage ratio determined in accordance with Article 429

the CRR. In determining the adequacy

the leverage ratio

investment firms and

the arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms implemented by investment firms to manage the risk

excessive leverage, the competent authority shall take into account the business model

those investment firms.

(6)The review and evaluation conducted by the competent authority shall include governance arrangements

investment firms, their corporate culture and values, and the ability

members

the management body to perform their duties. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 15 In conducting that review and evaluation, the competent authority shall, at least, have access to agendas and supporting documents for meetings

the management body and its committees, and the results

the internal or external evaluation

performance

the management body. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022. SCHEDULE II SUPERVISORY EXAMINATION PROGRAMME (Regulation 13)

(1)The annual supervisory examination programme referred to in regulation 13, shall contain the following: (a) an indication

how the competent authority intends to carry out its tasks and allocate its resources; (b) an identification

which investment firms are intended to be subject to enhanced supervision and the measures taken for such supervision as set out in paragraph 3; (c) a plan for inspections at the premises used by an investment firm, including its branches and subsidiaries established in other Member States in accordance with regulation 7

these regulations and regulations 3, 10, and 19

the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations.

(2)Supervisory examination programmes shall include the following investment firms: (a) investment firms for which the results

the stress tests referred to in points (a) and (g)

paragraph

(1)

Schedule I and regulation 14, or the outcome

the supervisory review and evaluation process under regulation 11, indicate significant risks to their on going financial soundness or indicate breaches

the Act, and any regulations and rules issued thereunder transposing the requirements

the CRD and

the CRR; (b) any other investment firm which the competent authority may deem necessary.

(3)Where appropriate under regulation 11 the following measures shall, in particular, be taken if necessary: (a) an increase in the number or frequency

on-site inspections

the investment firm; (b) a permanent presence

the competent authority at the investment firm; (

  1. c)additional or more frequent reporting by the investment firm; (
  2. d)additional or more frequent review

the operational, strategic or business plans

the investment firm; (e) thematic examinations monitoring specific risks that are likely to materialise.

(4)Adoption

a supervisory examination programme by a home Member State 16 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) European regulatory authority with respect to a European Investment Firm which has established a branch in Malta, shall not prevent the competent authority in its capacity as the host Member State from carrying out, on a case-by-case basis, onthe-spot checks and inspections

the activities carried out by branches

investment firms in Malta in accordance with the Act and these regulations. SCHEDULE III SUPERVISORY POWERS (Regulations 11, 16, paragraphs

(4)and
(5)

Schedule I and regulation 15

(4)) Amended by: L.N. 299

2015; Substituted by: L.N. 30

2022. Amended by:

(1)For the purposes

regulations 11, 16 and paragraphs

(4)and
(5)

Schedule I, regulation 15

(4), and the application

the CRR, the competent authority shall have at least the following powers: (a) to require investment firms to have additional own funds in excess

the requirements set out in the CRR under the conditions set out in paragraphs 3 to 7

this Schedule; (b) to require the reinforcement

the arrangements, processes, mechanisms and strategies implemented in accordance with Articles 73 and 74

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law; (

  1. c)to require investment firms to present a plan to restore compliance with supervisory requirements pursuant to the Act, regulations or Investment Services Rules issued thereunder, and to the CRR and set a deadline for its implementation, including improvements to that plan regarding the scope and the deadline; (
  2. d)to require investment firms to apply a specific provisioning policy or treatment

assets in terms

own funds requirements; (e) to restrict or limit the business, operations or network

institutions or to request the divestment

activities that pose excessive risks to the soundness

an investment firm; (f) to require the reduction

the risk inherent in the activities, products and systems

investment firms, including outsourced activities; (g) to require investment firms to limit variable remuneration as a percentage

net revenues where it is inconsistent with the maintenance

a sound capital base; (

  1. h)to require investment firms to use net profits to strengthen own funds; (
  2. i)to restrict or prohibit distributions or interest payments by an investment firm to shareholders, members or holders

Additional Tier 1 instruments within the meaning

the CRR, where the prohibition does not constitute an event

default

the investment firm; (

  1. j)to impose additional or more frequent reporting requirements, including reporting on own funds, liquidity and leverage; (
  2. k)to impose specific liquidity requirements, including restrictions on maturity mismatches between assets and liabilities; (
  3. l)to require additional disclosures. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 17

(2)
(1)For the purpose

paragraph 1(j)

this Schedule, the competent authority may only impose additional or more frequent reporting requirements on investment firms where the relevant requirement is appropriate and proportionate with regard to the purpose for which the information is required and where the information requested is not duplicative.

(2)For the purposes

regulations 11 to 16, any additional information that may be required from investment firms shall be deemed as duplicative where the same, or substantially the same, information has already been otherwise reported to the competent authority or may be produced by the competent authority.

(3)The competent authority shall not require an investment firm to report additional information where it has previously received it in a different format or level

granularity and that different format or granularity does not prevent the competent authority from producing information

the same quality and reliability as that produced on the basis

the additional information that would be otherwise reported.

(3)
(1)The competent authority shall impose the additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule where, on the basis

the reviews carried out in accordance with regulations 11 and 15, it determines any

the following situations for an individual investment firm: (a) the investment firm is exposed to risks or elements

risk that are not covered or sufficiently covered, as specified in paragraph 4

this Schedule, by the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/ 2402; (b) the investment firm does not meet the requirements set out in Articles 73 and 74

the CRD as transposed in the Investment Services Rules or in Article 393

the CRR and it is unlikely that other supervisory measures would be sufficient to ensure that those requirements can be met within an appropriate time frame; (c) the adjustments referred to in paragraph

(4)

Schedule I are deemed to be insufficient to enable the investment firm to sell or hedge out its positions within a short period without incurring material losses under normal market conditions; (d) the evaluation carried out in accordance with regulation 15

(4)reveals that the non-compliance with the requirements for the application

the permitted approach shall likely lead to inadequate own funds requirements; (e) the investment firm repeatedly fails to establish or maintain an adequate level

additional own funds to cover the guidance communicated in accordance with paragraph 10

this Schedule; (f) other institution-specific situations deemed by the competent authority to raise material supervisory concerns.

(2)The competent authority shall only impose the additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule to cover the risks incurred by individual investment firms due to their activities, including those reflecting the impact

certain economic and market developments on the risk profile

an individual investment firm. 18 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW)

(4)
(1)For the purpose

paragraph 3

(1)(a)

this Schedule, risks or elements

risk shall only be considered as not covered or sufficiently covered by the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402 where the amounts, types and distribution

capital considered adequate by the competent authority, taking into account the supervisory review

the assessment carried out by investment firms in accordance with the first paragraph

Article 73

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law are higher than the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402.

(2)For the purpose

the first sub-paragraph, the competent authority shall assess, taking into account the risk profile

each individual investment firm, the risks to which the investment firm is exposed, including: (a) institution-specific risks or elements

such risks that are explicitly excluded from or not explicitly addressed by the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402; (b) institution-specific risks or elements

such risks likely to be underestimated despite compliance with the applicable requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402.

(3)To the extent that risks or elements

risk are subject to transitional arrangements or grandfathering provisions laid down in the CRD and transposed in Maltese Law or in the CRR, they shall not be considered risks or elements

such risks likely to be underestimated despite compliance with the applicable requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402.

(4)For the purposes

sub-paragraph

(1), the capital considered adequate shall cover all risks or elements

risks identified as material pursuant to the assessment laid down in sub-paragraph

(2)that are not covered or not sufficiently covered by the own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402.

(5)Interest rate risk arising from non-trading book positions may be considered material at least in the cases referred to in paragraph 5

Schedule I, unless the competent authority, in performing the review and evaluation, come to the conclusion that the investment firm’s management

interest rate risk arising from nontrading book activities is adequate and that the investment firm is not excessively exposed to interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities.

(5)
(1)Where additional own funds are required to address risks other than the risk

excessive leverage not sufficiently covered by point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR, the competent authority shall determine the level

additional own funds required under paragraph 3(a)

this Schedule as the difference between the capital considered adequate pursuant to paragraph 4

this Schedule and the relevant own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402. INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 19

(2)Where additional own funds are required to address the risk

excessive leverage not sufficiently covered by point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR, the competent authority shall determine the level

the additional own funds required under paragraph 3(a)

this Schedule as the difference between the capital considered adequate pursuant to paragraph 4

this Schedule and the relevant own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR.

(6)
(1)The investment firm shall meet the additional own funds requirement imposed by the competent authority under paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule to address risks other than the risk

excessive leverage with own funds that satisfy the following conditions: (a) at least three quarters

the additional own funds requirement shall be met with Tier 1 capital; (b) at least three quarters

the Tier 1 capital referred to in point (a) shall be composed

Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

(2)By way

derogation from the first sub-paragraph

(1), the competent authority may require the investment firm to meet its additional own funds requirement with a higher portion

Tier 1 capital or Common Equity Tier 1 capital, where necessary, and having regard to the specific circumstances

the investment firm.

(3)Own funds that are used to meet the additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule imposed by the competent authority to address the risk

excessive leverage not sufficiently covered by point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR shall not be used to meet any

the following: (a) the own funds requirement set out in point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR; (

  1. b)the combined buffer requirement; (
  2. c)the guidance on additional own funds referred to in paragraph 10

this Schedule where that guidance addresses the risks other than the risk

excessive leverage.

(4)Own funds that are used to meet the additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule imposed by the competent authority to address the risk

excessive leverage not sufficiently covered by point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR shall not be used to meet any

the following: (a) the own funds requirement set out in point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR; (b) the leverage ratio buffer requirement referred to in Article 92

(1a)

the CRR; (c) the guidance on additional own funds referred to in paragraph 10

this Schedule, where that guidance addresses risks

excessive leverage.

(7)The competent authority shall duly justify in writing to each investment firm the decision to impose an additional own funds requirement under paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule. That justification shall include, in the case set out in paragraph 3(e)

this Schedule, a specific statement

the reasons for which the imposition

guidance on additional own funds is no longer considered sufficient. 20 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW)

(8)Pursuant to the strategies and processes referred to in Article 73

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law, investment firms shall set their internal capital at an adequate level

own funds that is sufficient to cover all the risks that an investment firm is exposed to and to ensure that the investment firm’s own funds can absorb potential losses resulting from stress scenarios, including those identified under the supervisory stress test referred to in regulation 14.

(9)
(1)The competent authority shall regularly review the level

the internal capital set by each investment firm in accordance with paragraph 8

this Schedule as part

the reviews and evaluations performed in accordance with regulation 11

(1)and 15
(1).
(2)Pursuant to that review, the competent authority shall determine for each investment firm the overall level

own funds it considers appropriate.

(10)
(1)The competent authority shall communicate its guidance on additional own funds to investment firms.
(2)The guidance on additional own funds shall be the own funds exceeding the relevant amount

own funds required pursuant to Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR, Chapter 12

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402, paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule and Article 128

(6)

the CRD as transposed in Maltese Law or pursuant to Article 92

(1a)

the CRR as relevant, which are required to reach the overall level

own funds considered appropriate by the competent authority pursuant to paragraph 9

this Schedule.

(11)The competent authority’s guidance on additional own funds pursuant to paragraph 10

this Schedule shall be institution-specific. The guidance may cover risks addressed by the additional own funds requirement imposed pursuant to paragraph

(1)(a)

this Schedule only to the extent that it covers aspects

those risks that are not already covered under that requirement.

(12)
(1)Own funds that are used to meet the guidance on additional own funds communicated in accordance with paragraph 10

this Schedule to address risks other than the risk

excessive leverage shall not be used to meet any

the following: (

  1. a)the own funds requirements set out in points (a), (
  2. b)and (c)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR; (b) the requirement laid down in paragraphs 3 to 7

this Schedule imposed by the competent authority to address risks other than the risk

excessive leverage and the combined buffer requirement.

(2)Own funds that are used to meet the guidance on additional own funds communicated in accordance with paragraph 10

this Schedule to address the risk

excessive leverage shall not be used to meet the own funds requirement set out in point (d)

Article 92

(1)

the CRR, the requirement laid down in paragraphs 3 to 7

this Schedule imposed by the competent authority to address the risk

excessive leverage and the leverage ratio buffer requirement referred to in Article 92

(1a)

the CRR.

(13)Failure to meet the guidance referred to in paragraph 10

this Schedule INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 21 where an investment firm meets the relevant own funds requirements set out in Parts Three, Four and Seven

the CRR and in Chapter 2

Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402, the relevant additional own funds requirement referred to in paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule and, as relevant, the combined buffer requirement or the leverage ratio buffer requirement referred to in Article 92

(1a)

the CRR shall not trigger the restrictions referred to in Article 141 or 141b

the CRD as transposed in the Investment Services Rules.

(14)The competent authority shall notify the Resolution Committee

the additional own funds requirement imposed on investment firms pursuant to paragraph 1(a)

this Schedule and

any guidance on additional own funds communicated to investment firms in accordance with paragraph 10

this Schedule. SCHEDULE IV DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS (Regulation 22)

(1)The competent authority shall publish the following information pursuant to regulation 22 herein: (a) the general criteria and methodologies adopted to review compliance with Articles 405 to 409

the CRR; (b) without prejudice to the confidentiality provisions in the Act, a summary description

the outcome

the supervisory review and description

the measures imposed in cases

non-compliance with Articles 405 to 409

the CRR identified on an annual basis.

(2)If the competent authority exercises the discretion laid down in Article 7
(3)

the CRR it shall publish the following information: (a) the criteria it applies to determine that there is no current or foreseen material practical or legal impediment to the prompt transfer

own funds or repayment

liabilities; (b) the number

parent investment firms or credit institutions which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 7

(3)

the CRR and the number

those which incorporate subsidiaries in a third country; (

  1. c)on an aggregate basis for Malta: (
  2. i)the total amount

own funds on the consolidated basis

the parent investment firm or credit institution in Malta, which benefits from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 7

(3)

the CRR, which are held in subsidiaries in a third country; (ii) the percentage

total own funds on the consolidated basis

parent investment firms in Malta which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 7

(3)

the CRR, represented by own funds which are held in subsidiaries in a third country; (iii) the percentage

total own funds required under Article 92

the CRR on the consolidated basis

parent investment firms or 22 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) credit institutions in Malta, which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 7

(3)

the CRR, represented by own funds which are held in subsidiaries in a third country.

(3)If the competent authority exercises the discretion laid down in Article 9
(1)

the CRR it shall publish all the following: (a) the criteria it applies to determine that there is no current or foreseen material practical or legal impediment to the prompt transfer

own funds or repayment

liabilities; (b) the number

parent investment firms or credit institutions which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 9

(1)

the CRR and the number

such parent investment firms which incorporate subsidiaries in a third country; (

  1. c)on an aggregate basis for Malta: (
  2. i)the total amount

own funds

parent investment firms which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 9

(1)

the CRR which are held in subsidiaries in a third country; (ii) the percentage

total own funds

parent investment firms or credit institutions which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 9

(1)

the CRR represented by own funds which are held in subsidiaries in a third country; (iii) the percentage

total own funds required under Article 92

the CRR

parent investment firms or credit institutions which benefit from the exercise

the discretion laid down in Article 9

(1)

the CRR represented by own funds which are held in subsidiaries in a third country. Amended by: L.N. 30

2022. SCHEDULE V BODIES WITH WHOM THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY MAY EXCHANGE INFORMATION (Regulation 6) The competent authority may exchange information with:

(1)Other European regulatory authorities and may transmit information to the ESRB, EBA, or ESMA in accordance with the CRD, the CRR and with article 15

Regulation (EU) No. 1092/2010, with Articles 31, 35 and 36

Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010 and with Articles 31 and 36

Regulation (EU) No. 1095/2010;

(2)Authorities entrusted with the public duty

supervising other financial sector entities and the authorities responsible for the supervision

financial markets;

(3)Authorities or bodies charged with responsibility for maintaining the stability

the financial system in Member States through the use

macro prudential rules;

(4)Reorganisation bodies or authorities aiming at protecting the stability

the financial system;

(5)Contractual or institutional protection schemes as referred to in Article INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 23 113
(7)

the CRR;

(6)Bodies involved in the liquidation and bankruptcy

institutions and in other similar procedures;

(7)Persons responsible for carrying out statutory audits

the accounts

institutions, insurance undertakings and financial institutions;

(8)Bodies which administer deposit-guarantee schemes and investor compensation schemes

information necessary for the exercise

their functions;

(9)Authorities responsible for overseeing: (a) the bodies involved in the liquidation and bankruptcy

institutions and in other similar procedures; (b) contractual or institutional protection schemes as referred to in Article 113

(7)

the CRR; (c) persons charged with carrying out statutory audits

the accounts

institutions, insurance undertakings and financial institutions; In the cases referred to sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) above, the exchange

information shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) that the information is exchanged for the purpose

performing the tasks referred to; (ii) where the information originates in another Member State, that it is not disclosed without the express agreement

the authorities which have disclosed it and, where appropriate, solely for the purposes for which those authorities gave their agreement;

(10)(a) Authorities or bodies responsible under law for the detection and investigation

breaches

company law subject to the following conditions: (i) that the information is exchanged for the purpose

detecting and investigating breaches

company law; (ii) where the information originates in another Member State, that it is not disclosed without the express agreement

the authorities which have disclosed it and, where appropriate, solely for the purposes for which those authorities gave their agreement. (b) Where the authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph (a) above perform their task

detection or investigation with the aid, in view

their specific competence,

persons appointed for that purpose and not employed in the public sector, information may be exchanged with such persons under the conditions specified in points (i) and (ii)

subparagraph (a)

this paragraph. The competent authority shall communicate to the EBA the names

the authorities or bodies which may receive information pursuant to this Article;

(11)ESCB central banks and other bodies with a similar function in their capacity as monetary authorities when the information is relevant for the exercise

their respective statutory tasks, including the conduct

monetary policy and related liquidity provisions, oversight

payments, clearing and settlement systems and the safeguarding

stability

the financial system;

(12)Contractual or institutional protection schemes as referred to in Article 113
(7)

the CRR;

(13)Other public authorities responsible for overseeing payment systems where 24 [ S.L.370.15 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) appropriate;
(14)The ESRB, EIOPA and ESMA, where that information is relevant for the exercise

their tasks under Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 or (EU) No. 1095/2010;

(15)In an emergency situation as referred to in regulation 5

the Supervisory Consolidation Regulations, the competent authority shall communicate, without delay, information to the ESCB central banks where that information is relevant for the exercise

their statutory tasks, including the conduct

monetary policy and related liquidity provision, the oversight

payments, clearing and settlement systems, and the safeguarding

the stability

the financial system, and to the ESRB where such information is relevant for the exercise

its statutory tasks;

(16)
(1)Other departments

Member States central government administrations responsible for law on the supervision

institutions, financial institutions and insurance undertakings and to inspectors acting on behalf

those departments provided that (a) such disclosures may be made only where necessary for reasons

prudential supervision, and prevention and resolution

failing institutions. (b) persons having access to such information shall be subject to professional secrecy.

(2)In an emergency situation as referred to in Article 114
(1)

the CRD, to disclose information which is relevant to the departments referred to in the first subparagraph

this article in all Member States concerned;

(17)
(1)Parliamentary enquiry committees, courts

auditors and other entities in charge

enquiries relating to the prudential supervision

institutions in Malta, subject to the following conditions: (a) that the entities have a precise mandate under national law to investigate or scrutinise the actions

authorities responsible for the supervision

institutions or for laws on such supervision; (

  1. b)that the information is strictly necessary for fulfilling the mandate referred to in sub-paragraph (a); (
  2. c)the persons with access to the information are subject to professional secrecy requirements under national law; (
  3. d)where the information originates in another Member State that it is not disclosed without the express agreement

the authorities which have disclosed it and, solely for the purposes for which those authorities gave their agreement.

(2)Information received pursuant to paragraphs
(1)to
(8)inclusive

this Schedule, and information obtained by means

an on-the-spot check or inspection referred to in regulation 7

these regulations, shall not be disclosed to the bodies referred to in paragraphs 16 and 17

(1)

this Schedule save with the express consent

the authorities which disclosed the information or

the authorities

the Member State in which such an on-the-spot check or inspection was carried out.

(18)
(1)Recognised clearing houses or other similar bodies responsible for the provision

clearing or settlement services in order to ensure the proper functioning

those bodies in relation to defaults or potential defaults by market participants

the information referred to in paragraph

(1)

this Schedule and articles 17

(7)and INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT (SUPERVISORY REVIEW) [ S.L.370.15 25 17F

the Act.

(2)The information received under paragraph
(1)

this Schedule shall not be disclosed in the circumstances referred to in sub-paragraph

(1)

this paragraph without the express consent

the competent authorities, which have disclosed it.

(19)Authorities responsible for supervising the obliged entities listed in points
(1)and
(2)

Article 2

(1)

Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention

the use

the financial system for the purposes

money laundering or terrorist financing

the European Parliament and

the Council for compliance with the said Directive.

(20)
(1)Notwithstanding Articles 26
(1)and 17
(7)

the Investment Services Act, the competent authority may, subject to the conditions set out in sub-paragraphs 2, 3 and 4

this paragraph, transmit or share certain information with the following: (a) the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, for the purposes

assessments for the Financial Sector Assessment Program; (b) the Bank for International Settlements, for the purposes

quantitative impact studies; (c) the Financial Stability Board, for the purposes

its surveillance function.

(2)The competent authority may only share confidential information following an explicit request by the relevant body, where at least the following conditions are met: (a) the request is duly justified in light

the specific tasks performed by the requesting body in accordance with its statutory mandate; (b) the request is sufficiently precise as to the nature, scope and format

the required information, and the means

its disclosure or transmission; (c) the requested information is strictly necessary for the performance

the specific tasks

the requesting body and does not go beyond the statutory tasks conferred on the requesting body; (d) the information is transmitted or disclosed exclusively to the persons directly involved in the performance

the specific task; (e) the persons having access to the information are subject to professional secrecy requirements at least equivalent to those referred to in Article 26

(1)

the Investment Services Act.

(3)Where the request is made by any

the entities referred to in sub-paragraph 1, the competent authority may only transmit aggregate or anonymised information and may only share other information at the premises

the competent authority.

(4)To the extent that the disclosure

information involves processing

personal data, any processing

personal data by the requesting body shall comply with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/679

the European Parliament and

the Council.

🔗 Għas-sors uffiċjali

AI explanation based on the official legal text. Indicative, not a substitute for legal advice.